Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Community Mediators in Malaysia

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES Kajian Malaysia Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.21315/km2022.40.2.3
S. Ahmad, R. Kahar, M. Hasbullah
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Community Mediators in Malaysia","authors":"S. Ahmad, R. Kahar, M. Hasbullah","doi":"10.21315/km2022.40.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family and neighbourhood issues are distinctly sensitive and emotional. They might also not be suitable to be settled using the existing courtroom device in the form of adjudication. It has been acknowledged that procedures in court have failed to address the emotional state of the disputants. The alternative way to resolve the dispute is by using mediation. A study was conducted among 217 community mediators selected to determine their knowledge, attitude and practice of community mediation. A self-administered questionnaire was used to gather the research data. The results revealed that the majority of the respondents (97.7%, n = 212) know that mediation is used to resolve community disputes. All respondents agreed that mediation helps in alleviating disputes in the community. The majority of the respondents (92.2%, n = 200) agreed that mediation is an important source of information and help for the community. The majority of the respondents (99.5%, n = 216) agreed that cooperation between mediators and members of the community is very important in reducing domestic disputes and gaps in the community. The study also found that a little over half of the respondents have a low attitude (51.2%, n = 111) on community mediation. Furthermore, listening to both disputants was the most (87.1%, n = 189) practiced technique used by the respondents in dispute resolution. The study concluded that the respondents have good knowledge of community mediation, a low regard for community mediation, and practise various techniques in resolving the disputes. Most of the respondents have fewer than 10 years of experience as a community mediator. Thus, it is understandable why they do not yet have a high attitude towards community mediation.","PeriodicalId":43145,"journal":{"name":"Kajian Malaysia","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kajian Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/km2022.40.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Family and neighbourhood issues are distinctly sensitive and emotional. They might also not be suitable to be settled using the existing courtroom device in the form of adjudication. It has been acknowledged that procedures in court have failed to address the emotional state of the disputants. The alternative way to resolve the dispute is by using mediation. A study was conducted among 217 community mediators selected to determine their knowledge, attitude and practice of community mediation. A self-administered questionnaire was used to gather the research data. The results revealed that the majority of the respondents (97.7%, n = 212) know that mediation is used to resolve community disputes. All respondents agreed that mediation helps in alleviating disputes in the community. The majority of the respondents (92.2%, n = 200) agreed that mediation is an important source of information and help for the community. The majority of the respondents (99.5%, n = 216) agreed that cooperation between mediators and members of the community is very important in reducing domestic disputes and gaps in the community. The study also found that a little over half of the respondents have a low attitude (51.2%, n = 111) on community mediation. Furthermore, listening to both disputants was the most (87.1%, n = 189) practiced technique used by the respondents in dispute resolution. The study concluded that the respondents have good knowledge of community mediation, a low regard for community mediation, and practise various techniques in resolving the disputes. Most of the respondents have fewer than 10 years of experience as a community mediator. Thus, it is understandable why they do not yet have a high attitude towards community mediation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚社区调解员的知识、态度与实践
家庭和邻里问题是非常敏感和情绪化的。它们也可能不适合以裁决的形式使用现有的法庭装置来解决。人们承认,法庭上的程序未能处理争端双方的情绪状态。另一种解决争议的方法是通过调解。本研究以217名社区调解员为调查对象,了解他们对社区调解的知识、态度和实践。采用自填问卷收集研究数据。结果显示,大多数受访者(97.7%,n = 212)知道调解是用来解决社区纠纷的。所有受访者都同意调解有助纾缓社会纠纷。大多数受访者(92.2%,n = 200)认为调解是社区信息和帮助的重要来源。大多数受访者(99.5%,n = 216)同意调解员与社区成员之间的合作对减少家庭纠纷和社区分歧非常重要。研究还发现,略多于一半的受访者(51.2%,n = 111)对社区调解的态度较低。此外,倾听争议双方的意见是受访者在解决争议时最常用的技巧(87.1%,n = 189)。调查的结论是,受访者对社区调解的认识较好,对社区调解的重视程度较低,并在解决纠纷时使用各种技巧。大多数受访者作为社区调解员的经验不足10年。因此,可以理解为什么他们对社区调解的态度还不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kajian Malaysia
Kajian Malaysia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intergenerational Ambivalence and Negotiations: Malaysian Chinese Family Dynamics in the Film The Journey Dynamic of Diversity of Rate Establishment in the Practice of Agricultural Zakat Collection in Malaysia Parliamentary Institutional Reforms in Malaysia: The Case of the Pakatan Harapan Era, 2018–2020 Get the Jab: Government Multisemiotic Legitimation of COVID-19 Vaccines in Malaysia River and Aquatic Insect: Awareness Level of Visitors at Recreational Rivers in the Northern Region of Peninsular Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1