{"title":"Left Ventricular Diastolic Dyssynchrony in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: Does It Predict Future Left Ventricular Remodeling?","authors":"Ju-Hee Lee","doi":"10.4250/jcu.2016.24.3.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is well-known complication after myocardial infarction (MI) and numerous studies have emphasized the clinical importance of ventricular remodeling. In these literatures, progressive LV dilatation and decreased LV ejection fraction were major determinants in future development of heart failure and long term survival. That is why early recognition of patients at risk for LV remodeling after MI has vital importance and identification of the predictive markers for developing ventricular remodeling is clinically meaningful. While the clinical importance of LV mechanical dyssynchrony is mainly described in heart failure patients, its significance in patients with MI was less well established. Actually, ventricular dyssynchrony is not uncommon in post-MI patients even with narrow QRS complexes. Zhang et al. and Fahmy Elnoamany et al. noted LV systolic dyssynchrony early after MI in 69.8% and 77.5% of the patients and it was mainly determined by the initial infarct size. After that, various parameters from tissue Doppler imaging and speckletracking technique have been used for detecting regional contraction and relaxation abnormalities and LV systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony early after MI. Several studies demonstrated that LV systolic dyssynchrony in post-MI patients is closely related with future LV remodeling and poor prognosis. Mollema et al. showed that patients with more extensive LV dyssynchrony at baseline have larger LV end systolic volume after 6 months of follow up and increased risk of LV remodeling. Similar results were showed by Zhang et al. that LV systolic dyssynchrony increased with worsening LV pISSN 1975-4612/ eISSN 2005-9655 Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Echocardiography www.kse-jcu.org http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.3.193","PeriodicalId":88913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","volume":"40 1","pages":"193 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.3.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
心肌梗死后患者左室舒张不同步:它能预测未来左室重构吗?
左心室重构是心肌梗死(MI)后常见的并发症,许多研究都强调了心室重构的临床重要性。在这些文献中,渐进性左室扩张和左室射血分数下降是心衰未来发展和长期生存的主要决定因素。这就是为什么早期识别心肌梗死后存在左室重构风险的患者至关重要,确定发生心室重构的预测标志物具有临床意义。虽然左室机械非同步化的临床重要性主要在心力衰竭患者中被描述,但其在心肌梗死患者中的意义却没有得到很好的证实。实际上,心室非同步化在心肌梗死后患者中并不罕见,即使QRS复合物狭窄。Zhang等和Fahmy Elnoamany等发现69.8%和77.5%的患者在心肌梗死后早期出现左室收缩不同步,主要由初始梗死面积决定。此后,组织多普勒成像和斑点跟踪技术的各种参数被用于检测心肌梗死后早期局部收缩舒张异常和左室收缩舒张不同步。多项研究表明,心肌梗死后患者左室收缩不同步与未来左室重构和预后不良密切相关。Mollema等研究表明,基线时左室非同步化程度更广泛的患者在随访6个月后左室末期收缩容积更大,左室重构风险增加。Zhang等人也有类似的结果,左室收缩不同步运动随着左室恶化而加重。pISSN 1975-4612/ eISSN 2005-9655版权所有©2016 Korean Society of Echocardiography www.kse-jcu.org http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.3.193
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。