Switching from Payroll Taxes to Corporate Income Taxes: Firms’ Employment and Wages after the 2012 Colombian Tax Reform

Economía Informa Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.31389/eco.51
Raquel Bernal, Marcela Meléndez, Marcela Eslava, Á. Pinzón
{"title":"Switching from Payroll Taxes to Corporate Income Taxes: Firms’ Employment and Wages after the 2012 Colombian Tax Reform","authors":"Raquel Bernal, Marcela Meléndez, Marcela Eslava, Á. Pinzón","doi":"10.31389/eco.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The 2012 Colombian tax reform reduced payroll taxes and employer contributions to health insurance by 13.5 percent, while also increasing corporate income taxes and leaving untouched the benefits to workers financed through these taxes. Shifting taxation from formal employment to other business activities is a policy recipe under heated discussion in Latin America. The reform offers an ideal laboratory for studying empirically the potential distortions against formal employment associated with payroll taxes in contrast to other taxes on firms. We analyze the impact of the reform on employment and wages using monthly firm-level data on all formal employment in nonpublic firms in the country and a difference-in-differences approach that takes advantage of the fact that a few sectors were exempt from the 2012 tax reform. We find a positive average effect of 4.3 percent on employment and 2.7 percent on average firm wages, for the average firm. The employment effect is found only for micro and small firms, whereas the bulk of the employment is concentrated in medium and large firms, which show no significant effect. According to these estimates, about 145,000 new jobs were created between January and May of 2015 by virtue of the reform. These results are generally supportive of efforts to reduce payroll taxes, though our findings on employment are less robust than those on wages, and large firms do not seem to have benefitted. The apparent lack of effect for medium and large employers is also a source of concern. We speculate that it may be due to these firms’ being more sensitive to the increase in corporate taxation that financed the reduction in payroll taxes, but lack of access to the relevant data prevents us from offering solid evidence regarding this hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":100390,"journal":{"name":"Economía Informa","volume":"7 1","pages":"41 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economía Informa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/eco.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The 2012 Colombian tax reform reduced payroll taxes and employer contributions to health insurance by 13.5 percent, while also increasing corporate income taxes and leaving untouched the benefits to workers financed through these taxes. Shifting taxation from formal employment to other business activities is a policy recipe under heated discussion in Latin America. The reform offers an ideal laboratory for studying empirically the potential distortions against formal employment associated with payroll taxes in contrast to other taxes on firms. We analyze the impact of the reform on employment and wages using monthly firm-level data on all formal employment in nonpublic firms in the country and a difference-in-differences approach that takes advantage of the fact that a few sectors were exempt from the 2012 tax reform. We find a positive average effect of 4.3 percent on employment and 2.7 percent on average firm wages, for the average firm. The employment effect is found only for micro and small firms, whereas the bulk of the employment is concentrated in medium and large firms, which show no significant effect. According to these estimates, about 145,000 new jobs were created between January and May of 2015 by virtue of the reform. These results are generally supportive of efforts to reduce payroll taxes, though our findings on employment are less robust than those on wages, and large firms do not seem to have benefitted. The apparent lack of effect for medium and large employers is also a source of concern. We speculate that it may be due to these firms’ being more sensitive to the increase in corporate taxation that financed the reduction in payroll taxes, but lack of access to the relevant data prevents us from offering solid evidence regarding this hypothesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从工资税转向企业所得税:2012年哥伦比亚税制改革后的企业就业和工资
摘要:2012年哥伦比亚税收改革将工资税和雇主健康保险的缴款减少了13.5%,同时增加了企业所得税,并没有触及通过这些税收提供资金的工人的福利。将税收从正式就业转移到其他商业活动是拉丁美洲正在热烈讨论的政策配方。这项改革提供了一个理想的实验室,可以从经验上研究与工资税相关的对正式就业的潜在扭曲,并与企业的其他税收进行对比。我们分析了改革对就业和工资的影响,使用了全国非公有制企业所有正式就业的月度企业层面数据,并采用了差分法,利用了2012年税收改革中少数行业豁免的事实。我们发现,平均而言,对就业的积极影响为4.3%,对平均企业工资的积极影响为2.7%。就业效应只存在于微型和小型企业,而大部分就业集中在大中型企业,没有明显的影响。根据这些估计,2015年1月至5月期间,改革创造了约14.5万个新工作岗位。这些结果总体上支持降低工资税的努力,尽管我们在就业方面的发现不如在工资方面的发现那么有力,而且大公司似乎并没有从中受益。对大中型雇主明显缺乏影响也是一个令人担忧的问题。我们推测,这可能是由于这些公司对企业税的增加更为敏感,而企业税的增加为工资税的减少提供了资金,但缺乏相关数据使我们无法提供有关这一假设的确凿证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#StayAtHome: Social Distancing Policies and Mobility in Latin America and the Caribbean The Socioeconomics of COVID and Lockdowns Outside Advanced Economies: The Case of Bogota Long-Run Economic Losses from COVID-Related Preprimary Program Closures in Latin America and the Caribbean The Impact of the Covid Pandemic Public Policies in Chile on Consumption Short and Long-Run Distributional Impacts of COVID-19 in Latin America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1