How does the absence of a consensus about the neural basis of consciousness and volition affect theorizing about conscious volition?

Amber R. Hopkins, L. Mudrik, U. Maoz
{"title":"How does the absence of a consensus about the neural basis of consciousness and volition affect theorizing about conscious volition?","authors":"Amber R. Hopkins, L. Mudrik, U. Maoz","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197572153.003.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces the neuroscientific study of consciousness, volition, and conscious volition, discussing the lack of consensus and other obstacles neuroscientists face in identifying their neural bases. It describes how theoretical frameworks and philosophical work come into play toward this end. The chapter also discusses the importance of collaboration between neuroscientists and philosophers, zooming out and reflecting on differences between progress in philosophy and progress in neuroscience.","PeriodicalId":11169,"journal":{"name":"Determinism and Free Will","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Determinism and Free Will","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197572153.003.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter introduces the neuroscientific study of consciousness, volition, and conscious volition, discussing the lack of consensus and other obstacles neuroscientists face in identifying their neural bases. It describes how theoretical frameworks and philosophical work come into play toward this end. The chapter also discusses the importance of collaboration between neuroscientists and philosophers, zooming out and reflecting on differences between progress in philosophy and progress in neuroscience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于意识和意志的神经基础缺乏共识如何影响有意识意志的理论化?
本章介绍了意识、意志和有意识意志的神经科学研究,讨论了神经科学家在识别其神经基础时缺乏共识和其他障碍。它描述了理论框架和哲学工作如何在这一目标中发挥作用。本章还讨论了神经科学家和哲学家之间合作的重要性,缩小并反映了哲学进步和神经科学进步之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How can we determine whether or not an agent is conscious of a bit of information relevant to an action? How are the neural processes for deciding when to move similar to and different from those for deciding what or how to move? How does the absence of a consensus about the neural basis of consciousness and volition affect theorizing about conscious volition? How can we determine the precise timing of brain events related to action? Do conscious decisions cause physical actions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1