In Memory of George Floyd

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studying Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17425964.2022.2058317
J. Kitchen, A. Berry
{"title":"In Memory of George Floyd","authors":"J. Kitchen, A. Berry","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2022.2058317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The death of George Floyd shocked the world in the summer of 2020. The video recording of a Minneapolis police officer pressing his knee against Mr. Floyd’s neck for over nine minutes, while other officers watched and did nothing, stands as incontrovertible evidence that racialized people (especially Blacks) are often victimized by the implicit biases and overt actions of White police officers. More recently, the officers involved were convicted for their action that led to George Floyd’s death. While shocking, the incident was hardly surprising to racialized people or those of us committed to social justice. This was one of many instances in a wider pattern of violence and discrimination directed at Blacks by police officers; Floyd’s name joins a list of names including Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Breonna Taylor and Duante Wright. This was just one of many events during the era of President Trump (2016–2020) that represented a sharp turn away from the apparent progress signalled by the election of his predecessor Barack Obama (2008–2016). The shift from racial progress to racial regression over two presidencies is representative of similar cycles in the history of the United States and the world. ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice,’ proclaimed President Barrack Obama in a eulogy for one of the victims of a mass shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina (Kakutani, 2015). These words, first expressed in a sermon by Theodore Parker in the 1850ʹs and made famous by Martin Luther King Jr. in the 1960ʹs, were intended to offer hope in difficult times. Kendi (2021), however, expressed concern that this ‘popular construct of racial progress’ is problematic today. He argued that its application today ‘does more than conceal and obfuscate: it actually undermines the effort to achieve and maintain equality’ (p. 425). The singular racial history of the United States, according to Kendi (2021), is characterized by duality between ‘historical steps toward equity and justice and historical steps toward inequity and injustice’ (p. 425). Elsewhere, Kendi, 2019) wrote that the ongoing historical tension between antiracist progress and racist progress can only be broken by moving beyond the duel between segregationist and assimilationist mindsets through antiracism. Antiracism entails recognition that ‘racist policies are the cause of racial inequities’ (p. 20) and that individual acts of racism, such as the killing of George Floyd, are not outliers but ‘an immediate and visible manifestation of an underlying racial policy’ (p. 20). Such policies and practices also permeate education, where racialized students continue to face discrimination ad diminished opportunities for advancement. This ‘In Memory of George Floyd’ special issue of Studying Teacher Education is a response to the structural racism that informs society and its institutions. How can teacher educators address their own inherent biases and unconscious perpetuation of racist policies? How can they address diversity, equity and inclusion in their classes? How can they break free to become antiracists? STUDYING TEACHER EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 18, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2058317","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"80 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2058317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The death of George Floyd shocked the world in the summer of 2020. The video recording of a Minneapolis police officer pressing his knee against Mr. Floyd’s neck for over nine minutes, while other officers watched and did nothing, stands as incontrovertible evidence that racialized people (especially Blacks) are often victimized by the implicit biases and overt actions of White police officers. More recently, the officers involved were convicted for their action that led to George Floyd’s death. While shocking, the incident was hardly surprising to racialized people or those of us committed to social justice. This was one of many instances in a wider pattern of violence and discrimination directed at Blacks by police officers; Floyd’s name joins a list of names including Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Breonna Taylor and Duante Wright. This was just one of many events during the era of President Trump (2016–2020) that represented a sharp turn away from the apparent progress signalled by the election of his predecessor Barack Obama (2008–2016). The shift from racial progress to racial regression over two presidencies is representative of similar cycles in the history of the United States and the world. ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice,’ proclaimed President Barrack Obama in a eulogy for one of the victims of a mass shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina (Kakutani, 2015). These words, first expressed in a sermon by Theodore Parker in the 1850ʹs and made famous by Martin Luther King Jr. in the 1960ʹs, were intended to offer hope in difficult times. Kendi (2021), however, expressed concern that this ‘popular construct of racial progress’ is problematic today. He argued that its application today ‘does more than conceal and obfuscate: it actually undermines the effort to achieve and maintain equality’ (p. 425). The singular racial history of the United States, according to Kendi (2021), is characterized by duality between ‘historical steps toward equity and justice and historical steps toward inequity and injustice’ (p. 425). Elsewhere, Kendi, 2019) wrote that the ongoing historical tension between antiracist progress and racist progress can only be broken by moving beyond the duel between segregationist and assimilationist mindsets through antiracism. Antiracism entails recognition that ‘racist policies are the cause of racial inequities’ (p. 20) and that individual acts of racism, such as the killing of George Floyd, are not outliers but ‘an immediate and visible manifestation of an underlying racial policy’ (p. 20). Such policies and practices also permeate education, where racialized students continue to face discrimination ad diminished opportunities for advancement. This ‘In Memory of George Floyd’ special issue of Studying Teacher Education is a response to the structural racism that informs society and its institutions. How can teacher educators address their own inherent biases and unconscious perpetuation of racist policies? How can they address diversity, equity and inclusion in their classes? How can they break free to become antiracists? STUDYING TEACHER EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 18, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2058317
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纪念乔治·弗洛伊德
2020年夏天,乔治·弗洛伊德的去世震惊了世界。视频记录了一名明尼阿波利斯警察用膝盖压着弗洛伊德的脖子长达九分钟,而其他警察在一旁袖手旁观,这是无可争议的证据,表明种族化的人(尤其是黑人)经常受到白人警察的隐性偏见和公开行为的伤害。最近,涉案警官因其导致乔治·弗洛伊德死亡的行为而被定罪。虽然令人震惊,但对于种族化的人或我们这些致力于社会正义的人来说,这一事件并不令人惊讶。这是警察针对黑人的更广泛的暴力和歧视模式中的许多例子之一;弗洛伊德的名字加入了包括埃里克·加纳、迈克尔·布朗、布雷安娜·泰勒和杜兰特·赖特在内的名单。这只是特朗普总统任期(2016-2020年)期间发生的众多事件之一,这些事件代表着与前任巴拉克•奥巴马(Barack Obama)当选(2008-2016年)所标志的明显进展的急剧转变。在两任总统任期内,从种族进步到种族倒退的转变,代表了美国和世界历史上类似的周期。“道德宇宙的弧线很长,但它向正义倾斜,”奥巴马总统在为南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿伊曼纽尔非洲卫理公会圣公会教堂大规模枪击事件的一名受害者致悼词时宣称(Kakutani, 2015)。这句话最初是由西奥多·帕克在19世纪50年代的一次布道中说出来的,并在20世纪60年代被马丁·路德·金发扬光大,意在给困难时期的人们带来希望。然而,Kendi(2021)表示担心这种“流行的种族进步结构”在今天是有问题的。他认为,今天的应用“不仅仅是掩盖和混淆:它实际上破坏了实现和维持平等的努力”(第425页)。根据Kendi(2021)的说法,美国独特的种族历史具有“走向平等和正义的历史步骤与走向不平等和不公正的历史步骤”的两重性(第425页)。在其他地方,Kendi(2019)写道,只有通过反种族主义超越隔离主义和同化主义思维之间的对决,才能打破反种族主义进步和种族主义进步之间持续的历史紧张关系。反种族主义需要承认“种族主义政策是种族不平等的原因”(第20页),种族主义的个别行为,如杀害乔治·弗洛伊德,不是例外情况,而是“潜在种族政策的直接和可见的表现”(第20页)。这种政策和做法也渗透到教育中,在教育中,种族化的学生继续面临歧视,晋升机会减少。《教师教育研究》的这期“纪念乔治·弗洛伊德”特刊是对影响社会及其机构的结构性种族主义的回应。教师教育者如何解决自身固有的偏见和种族主义政策的无意识延续?他们如何解决班级的多样性、公平性和包容性问题?他们怎么能挣脱束缚成为反种族主义者呢?《教师教育研究2022》第18卷第1期。1,1 - 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2058317
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Methods, Data Collection, and Trustworthiness in Self-Study Research: A Content Analysis of the First 19 Volumes of Studying Teacher Education Self-Study As Reflective Practice and Active Engagement Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) As a Critical Friend: The Affordances and Limitations Self-Study Navigating Boundaries of Race, Culture, Language and Context Experiencing Tensions When Integrating Language Diversity into Mathematics Teacher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1