Early genetic outcomes of American black bear reintroductions in the Central Appalachians, USA

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY Ursus Pub Date : 2019-05-29 DOI:10.2192/URSU-D-18-00011.1
Sean M. Murphy, J. Hast, B. Augustine, D. Weisrock, J. D. Clark, David M. Kocka, C. W. Ryan, Jaime L. Sajecki, J. Cox
{"title":"Early genetic outcomes of American black bear reintroductions in the Central Appalachians, USA","authors":"Sean M. Murphy, J. Hast, B. Augustine, D. Weisrock, J. D. Clark, David M. Kocka, C. W. Ryan, Jaime L. Sajecki, J. Cox","doi":"10.2192/URSU-D-18-00011.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Habitat loss and overexploitation extirpated American black bears (Ursus americanus) from most of the Central Appalachians, USA, by the early 20th Century. To attempt to restore bears to the southwestern portion of this region, 2 reintroductions that used small founder groups (n = 27 and 55 bears), but different release methods (hard vs. soft), were conducted during the 1990s. We collected hair samples from black bears during 2004–2016 in the reintroduced Big South Fork (BSF) and Kentucky–Virginia populations (KVP), their respective Great Smoky Mountains (GSM) and Shenandoah National Park (SNP) source populations, and a neighboring population in southern West Virginia (SWV) to investigate the early genetic outcomes of bear reintroduction. Despite having undergone genetic bottlenecks, genetic diversity remained similar between reintroduced populations and their sources approximately 15 years after the founder events (ranges: AR = 4.86–5.61; HO = 0.67–0.75; HE = 0.65–0.71). Effective population sizes of the reintroduced KVP and BSF (NE = 31 and 36, respectively) were substantially smaller than their respective SNP and GSM sources (NE = 119 and 156, respectively), supporting founder effects. Genetic structure analysis indicated that the hard-released (i.e., no acclimation period) KVP founder group likely declined considerably, whereas the soft-released BSF founder group remained mostly intact, suggesting superior effectiveness of soft releases. Asymmetrical gene flow via immigration from the SWV has resulted in the KVP recovering from the initial founder group reduction. Sustained isolation, small NE, and small population size of the BSF may warrant continued genetic monitoring to determine if gene flow from neighboring populations is established or NE declines. For future bear reintroductions, we suggest managers consider sourcing founders from populations with high genetic diversity and soft-releasing bears to locales that are, if possible, within the dispersal capability of extant populations to mitigate the potential consequences of founder effects and isolation.","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":"36 1","pages":"119 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSU-D-18-00011.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract: Habitat loss and overexploitation extirpated American black bears (Ursus americanus) from most of the Central Appalachians, USA, by the early 20th Century. To attempt to restore bears to the southwestern portion of this region, 2 reintroductions that used small founder groups (n = 27 and 55 bears), but different release methods (hard vs. soft), were conducted during the 1990s. We collected hair samples from black bears during 2004–2016 in the reintroduced Big South Fork (BSF) and Kentucky–Virginia populations (KVP), their respective Great Smoky Mountains (GSM) and Shenandoah National Park (SNP) source populations, and a neighboring population in southern West Virginia (SWV) to investigate the early genetic outcomes of bear reintroduction. Despite having undergone genetic bottlenecks, genetic diversity remained similar between reintroduced populations and their sources approximately 15 years after the founder events (ranges: AR = 4.86–5.61; HO = 0.67–0.75; HE = 0.65–0.71). Effective population sizes of the reintroduced KVP and BSF (NE = 31 and 36, respectively) were substantially smaller than their respective SNP and GSM sources (NE = 119 and 156, respectively), supporting founder effects. Genetic structure analysis indicated that the hard-released (i.e., no acclimation period) KVP founder group likely declined considerably, whereas the soft-released BSF founder group remained mostly intact, suggesting superior effectiveness of soft releases. Asymmetrical gene flow via immigration from the SWV has resulted in the KVP recovering from the initial founder group reduction. Sustained isolation, small NE, and small population size of the BSF may warrant continued genetic monitoring to determine if gene flow from neighboring populations is established or NE declines. For future bear reintroductions, we suggest managers consider sourcing founders from populations with high genetic diversity and soft-releasing bears to locales that are, if possible, within the dispersal capability of extant populations to mitigate the potential consequences of founder effects and isolation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国中部阿巴拉契亚重新引进美洲黑熊的早期遗传结果
摘要:20世纪初,美国中部阿巴拉契亚大部分地区的美洲黑熊(Ursus americanus)因栖息地丧失和过度开发而灭绝。为了尝试在该地区的西南部分恢复熊,在20世纪90年代进行了2次重新引入,使用了小的创始人群体(n = 27和55只熊),但不同的释放方法(硬或软)。我们收集了2004-2016年重新引入的大南福克(BSF)和肯塔基-弗吉尼亚州种群(KVP)、各自的大烟山(GSM)和谢南多厄国家公园(SNP)源种群以及西弗吉尼亚州南部邻近种群(SWV)的黑熊毛发样本,以调查熊重新引入的早期遗传结果。尽管经历了遗传瓶颈,但在创建事件发生约15年后,重新引入的种群与其来源之间的遗传多样性保持相似(范围:AR = 4.86-5.61;Ho = 0.67-0.75;He = 0.65-0.71)。重新引入的KVP和BSF的有效种群大小(NE = 31和36)明显小于SNP和GSM源(NE = 119和156),支持方正效应。遗传结构分析表明,硬释放(即无驯化期)的KVP方正组可能大幅下降,而软释放的BSF方正组基本保持完整,表明软释放的效果更佳。来自SWV移民的不对称基因流导致KVP从最初的创始群体减少中恢复。持续的隔离、小的NE和小的BSF种群规模可能需要继续进行遗传监测,以确定来自邻近种群的基因流是否建立或NE减少。对于未来的熊类重新引入,我们建议管理者考虑从具有高遗传多样性的种群中寻找创始人,并在可能的情况下将熊软性释放到现有种群的传播能力范围内,以减轻创始人效应和隔离的潜在后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ursus
Ursus 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.
期刊最新文献
Brown bear food habits in natural and human-modified landscapes in West-European Russia Escaping heat and anthropogenic pressures? Asiatic black bear denning behavior in its westernmost global range Interactions between brown bear cubs of different mothers in Kashmir, India Social network analysis uncovers hidden social complexity in giant pandas Survey on gastro-intestinal parasites of captive sun bears in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1