Kuram Odaklı Analizlerde Soru Listesi Geliştirme: Dört Çerçeve Modeli ve İlişkili Kuramlar

Yılmaz Tonbul
{"title":"Kuram Odaklı Analizlerde Soru Listesi Geliştirme: Dört Çerçeve Modeli ve İlişkili Kuramlar","authors":"Yılmaz Tonbul","doi":"10.52096/usbd.7.30.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to develop a checklist of questions that can be used in the analysis of institutional functioning or problems by relating each framework in the four-framework model developed by Bolman and Deal with different theories. Graduate education institutions were selected as the unit of analysis and the questions were developed taking into account the functioning and problems in the institutions. The method of document analysis was used in the research based on qualitative research. Graduate theses in Google Scholar and YÖK thesis database, articles, papers and books published in refereed journals and indexed in international and national indexes were used as data sources. In selecting the theories, the overlap between the content of the Four Frame Model and the assumptions of the theories was taken into account. The selected theories are limited to the accessed theories and the consensus among the researchers regarding the content of the Four Fram Model and the overlap of the assumptions of these theories. In the process of data collection and analysis, an algorithm was created by the researchers and description, sampling and association were used in the analysis. According to the results of the research, a checklist of questions was developed, taking into account that the structural frame dimension of the model can be used with Bureaucracy Theory and Organisational Ecology Theory; the human resource frame dimension with Motivation Theory and Mental Models Theory; the political framework with Organisational Cohesion Theory and Actor Network Theory; and the symbolic frame with Symbolic Interaction Theory. In a further study, the checklist can be extended with different theories, the functionality of the question checklist can be tested with experimental studies, and software for theory-oriented decision support systems can be developed. Keywords: Four-Frame Model Theory based analysis, postgraduate education,","PeriodicalId":30893,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences Educational Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.7.30.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop a checklist of questions that can be used in the analysis of institutional functioning or problems by relating each framework in the four-framework model developed by Bolman and Deal with different theories. Graduate education institutions were selected as the unit of analysis and the questions were developed taking into account the functioning and problems in the institutions. The method of document analysis was used in the research based on qualitative research. Graduate theses in Google Scholar and YÖK thesis database, articles, papers and books published in refereed journals and indexed in international and national indexes were used as data sources. In selecting the theories, the overlap between the content of the Four Frame Model and the assumptions of the theories was taken into account. The selected theories are limited to the accessed theories and the consensus among the researchers regarding the content of the Four Fram Model and the overlap of the assumptions of these theories. In the process of data collection and analysis, an algorithm was created by the researchers and description, sampling and association were used in the analysis. According to the results of the research, a checklist of questions was developed, taking into account that the structural frame dimension of the model can be used with Bureaucracy Theory and Organisational Ecology Theory; the human resource frame dimension with Motivation Theory and Mental Models Theory; the political framework with Organisational Cohesion Theory and Actor Network Theory; and the symbolic frame with Symbolic Interaction Theory. In a further study, the checklist can be extended with different theories, the functionality of the question checklist can be tested with experimental studies, and software for theory-oriented decision support systems can be developed. Keywords: Four-Frame Model Theory based analysis, postgraduate education,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的目的是通过将Bolman和Deal与不同理论开发的四框架模型中的每个框架联系起来,开发一份可用于分析制度功能或问题的问题清单。研究生教育机构被选为分析单位,这些问题是考虑到这些机构的运作和问题而制定的。在定性研究的基础上,采用文献分析的方法。数据来源为Google Scholar和YÖK论文数据库中的研究生论文,以及在国际和国家索引中收录的期刊上发表的文章、论文和书籍。在选择理论时,考虑了四框架模型的内容与理论假设之间的重叠。所选择的理论仅限于已获得的理论和研究者对四框架模型内容的共识以及这些理论假设的重叠。在数据收集和分析的过程中,研究人员创建了一种算法,并在分析中使用了描述、抽样和关联。根据研究结果,考虑到模型的结构框架维度可以与官僚制理论和组织生态学理论一起使用,开发了问题清单;动机理论和心理模型理论的人力资源框架维度;组织衔接理论和行动者网络理论的政治框架;符号互动理论的符号框架。在进一步的研究中,可以用不同的理论来扩展清单,可以用实验研究来检验问题清单的功能,可以开发面向理论的决策支持系统软件。关键词:四框架模型理论分析;研究生教育;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
English Language Skills Required in Marriott Convention Centre in Algeria DEMOCRACY, DEMOGRAPHY & DIASPORA: ELECTORAL LEGITIMACY, KEY TO CROATIA’S FUTURE influence of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance in the regional office of the directorate general of customs and excise of east Kalimantan Implementation of quality family village program to enhance family welfare in Moya Village, Central Ternate Subdistrict Tek Ebeveynli Bireyler Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1