Kajian Prinsip Demokrasi Dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia

Yagus Triana. H.S, Etika Khairina, Mochammad Iqbal Fadhlurrohman
{"title":"Kajian Prinsip Demokrasi Dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia","authors":"Yagus Triana. H.S, Etika Khairina, Mochammad Iqbal Fadhlurrohman","doi":"10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study seeks to determine democracy in Indonesia's general elections. The 1955 election was intended to be the most democratic in history, despite Indonesia's fragile security situation. This study employs a qualitative methodology by synthesizing secondary data sources, such as social media, mass media, election papers, and democracy evaluation documents. To verify the previously studied data, the data source will be validated using a data analysis program, the Nvivo 12 Plus power analysis tool, and the theory employed in this work. The results of this study are based on an analysis of the data gathered to support the claim that democratic elections have been held in Indonesia; however, the implementation process cannot be deemed a success because there are still a great number of problems associated with the implementation of elections. In addition, election actors are responsible for complications, such as money politics, which lead to multiple decisions. However, according to the data collected, the level of democracy from year to year is relatively high.","PeriodicalId":33193,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Transformative","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Transformative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. This study seeks to determine democracy in Indonesia's general elections. The 1955 election was intended to be the most democratic in history, despite Indonesia's fragile security situation. This study employs a qualitative methodology by synthesizing secondary data sources, such as social media, mass media, election papers, and democracy evaluation documents. To verify the previously studied data, the data source will be validated using a data analysis program, the Nvivo 12 Plus power analysis tool, and the theory employed in this work. The results of this study are based on an analysis of the data gathered to support the claim that democratic elections have been held in Indonesia; however, the implementation process cannot be deemed a success because there are still a great number of problems associated with the implementation of elections. In addition, election actors are responsible for complications, such as money politics, which lead to multiple decisions. However, according to the data collected, the level of democracy from year to year is relatively high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analisis Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) dalam Kebijakan Undang-undang Pelindungan Data Pribadi (UU PDP) Politik Perencanaan Pembangunan: Telaah Atas Pengarusutamaan Tata Ruang The Distinctive Asymmetrical Decentralization in the Archipelagic Region: The Case of West Nusa Tenggara Province of Indonesia Implementasi Konsep Agile Governance dalam Penanganan Krisis Ekonomi Pasca Pandemi COVID-19 di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dinamika Politik Catch-all atas Eksistensi Perempuan di Partai Demokrat dan Partai Keadilan Sejahtera Wilayah Banten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1