{"title":"Determining conventional and unconventional oil and gas well brines in natural samples III: mass ratio analyses using both anions and cations","authors":"Tetiana Cantlay, D. Bain, J. Stolz","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2019.1666562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Identifying the types of contamination and their sources in surface and groundwater is fundamental for effective protection of private and public source waters. Here we employed mass ratio analyses of a variety of anion and cation pairs to characterize flowback, produced water, and mine drainage. These endmembers were used to evaluate the source contributions of natural surface and ground water samples. A total of 1,177 ground water and surface water samples were analyzed including high-quality source waters and waters suspected of being impacted by drilling and mining activity. We found the following chemical ratios resolved different sources of contamination: Mg/Na vs SO4/Cl; SO4/Cl vs Mg/Li; Br/SO4 vs Ba/Cl; and Br vs Mg/Li. While no single parameter or mass ratio pairing by itself was definitive it was possible to converge on a likely source of contamination using multiple lines of analytical evidence. Further, this process clarified sources in impacted samples where one or more parameters commonly considered diagnostic of specific sources (e.g., Br, Ba), were below detection limits (e.g., too dilute) or not tested for. Ultimately, movement of sample values within the mass ratio space allows tracking of changes in water quality and contamination source dynamics as the water chemistry evolves.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"44 1","pages":"24 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1666562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Abstract Identifying the types of contamination and their sources in surface and groundwater is fundamental for effective protection of private and public source waters. Here we employed mass ratio analyses of a variety of anion and cation pairs to characterize flowback, produced water, and mine drainage. These endmembers were used to evaluate the source contributions of natural surface and ground water samples. A total of 1,177 ground water and surface water samples were analyzed including high-quality source waters and waters suspected of being impacted by drilling and mining activity. We found the following chemical ratios resolved different sources of contamination: Mg/Na vs SO4/Cl; SO4/Cl vs Mg/Li; Br/SO4 vs Ba/Cl; and Br vs Mg/Li. While no single parameter or mass ratio pairing by itself was definitive it was possible to converge on a likely source of contamination using multiple lines of analytical evidence. Further, this process clarified sources in impacted samples where one or more parameters commonly considered diagnostic of specific sources (e.g., Br, Ba), were below detection limits (e.g., too dilute) or not tested for. Ultimately, movement of sample values within the mass ratio space allows tracking of changes in water quality and contamination source dynamics as the water chemistry evolves.
识别地表水和地下水中的污染类型及其来源是有效保护公私水源的基础。在这里,我们采用各种阴离子和阳离子对的质量比分析来表征返排、采出水和矿井排水。这些端元被用来评价天然地表水和地下水样品的来源贡献。总共分析了1177个地下水和地表水样本,包括优质水源水和疑似受钻井和采矿活动影响的水。我们发现以下化学比例可以解决不同的污染源:Mg/Na vs SO4/Cl;SO4/Cl vs Mg/Li;Br/SO4 vs Ba/Cl;Br / Mg/Li。虽然单一参数或质量比配对本身是不确定的,但有可能使用多条分析证据集中在可能的污染源上。此外,该过程澄清了受影响样品中的来源,其中一个或多个参数通常被认为是诊断特定来源(例如,Br, Ba),低于检测限(例如,太稀)或未检测。最终,随着水化学的演变,样品值在质量比空间内的移动可以跟踪水质和污染源动态的变化。