A mixed methods study of faculty experiences in a course design institute

C. Cardamone, Heather Dwyer
{"title":"A mixed methods study of faculty experiences in a course design institute","authors":"C. Cardamone, Heather Dwyer","doi":"10.3998/tia.2108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote teaching created a unique opportunity to study the experiences of faculty participating in a course design institute. Hundreds enrolled the online institute, where technologies (e.g., Zoom, Canvas, Google Docs, etc.) facilitated interactions among participants and preserved their ideas and perspectives throughout the program. Using a grounded theory analysis approach attentive to the participants’ words, the authors uncovered participants’ experiences and their perspectives on the structures that shaped those experiences. The data ultimately revealed five themes (pedagogical knowledge; student perspective; community and connection; technology; emotion) that relate to changes in participant attitudes, perceptions, and/or pedagogical approaches. Drawing on these themes, we identify implications for future professional development programing design that align with other results from the literature, including the importance of modeling the student experience, deliberately addressing community and connection, building in time for synthesis and commitment, and prompting faculty to identify and reflect on their emotions. Though some of the identified themes may have been more visible because data were captured in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, these themes are aligned with prior research and existing learning theories and will apply to the design of course design institutes beyond the context of crisis situations. ","PeriodicalId":74859,"journal":{"name":"Spring simulation conference (SpringSim)","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spring simulation conference (SpringSim)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.2108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote teaching created a unique opportunity to study the experiences of faculty participating in a course design institute. Hundreds enrolled the online institute, where technologies (e.g., Zoom, Canvas, Google Docs, etc.) facilitated interactions among participants and preserved their ideas and perspectives throughout the program. Using a grounded theory analysis approach attentive to the participants’ words, the authors uncovered participants’ experiences and their perspectives on the structures that shaped those experiences. The data ultimately revealed five themes (pedagogical knowledge; student perspective; community and connection; technology; emotion) that relate to changes in participant attitudes, perceptions, and/or pedagogical approaches. Drawing on these themes, we identify implications for future professional development programing design that align with other results from the literature, including the importance of modeling the student experience, deliberately addressing community and connection, building in time for synthesis and commitment, and prompting faculty to identify and reflect on their emotions. Though some of the identified themes may have been more visible because data were captured in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, these themes are aligned with prior research and existing learning theories and will apply to the design of course design institutes beyond the context of crisis situations. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课程设计学院教师经验的混合方法研究
远程教学创造了一个独特的机会来研究教师参与课程设计研究所的经验。数百人报名参加了在线学院,在那里,技术(如Zoom、Canvas、谷歌Docs等)促进了参与者之间的互动,并在整个项目中保留了他们的想法和观点。作者采用一种基于理论的分析方法,专注于参与者的话语,揭示了参与者的经历以及他们对塑造这些经历的结构的看法。数据最终揭示了五个主题(教学知识;学生的视角;社区和联系;技术;情感)与参与者态度、观念和/或教学方法的变化有关。根据这些主题,我们确定了与文献中其他结果相一致的未来专业发展规划设计的含义,包括建模学生体验的重要性,故意解决社区和联系,及时建立综合和承诺,并促使教师识别和反思他们的情感。虽然由于数据是在COVID-19大流行的第一年采集的,因此确定的一些主题可能更加明显,但这些主题与先前的研究和现有的学习理论相一致,并将适用于危机情况背景下的课程设计机构的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing for agility in constant change: HR strategies for teaching center leaders A mixed methods study of faculty experiences in a course design institute THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND POLLUANTS CONTENT OF SOME ECOLOGICAL AND CONVENTIONAL GREEN FORAGE SOURCES FOR DAIRY COW FEED THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF MACERATION-FERMENTATION ON THE PHENOLIC COMPOSITION OF RED WINES SEED DORMANCY BREAKING OF AN ENDANGERED MEDICINAL TREE SPECIES (TAXUS BACCATA L.) USING EMBRYO CULTURE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1