Reflections on Being a Successful Academic Researcher

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.34190/jbrm.17.2.01
S. Pather, D. Remenyi
{"title":"Reflections on Being a Successful Academic Researcher","authors":"S. Pather, D. Remenyi","doi":"10.34190/jbrm.17.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research is central to the life of the career academic.\n However, the framework in which academic research is conducted is\n not generally well understood and neither is it often articulated or\n discussed. The literature tends to rather focus on issues in\n relation to specific research methodologies and the evaluation\n thereof. Additionally, previous research argues that it is common\n for university academics to have little or no formal preparation for\n their role as teachers. This paper posits that the same applies to\n that of the academic’s role as a researcher. It cannot be assumed\n that the mere obtaining of a Doctoral degree, prepares the novice\n academic for a research career. Early career academics are expected\n to acquire an understanding of how to survive as a researcher\n through a process more related to osmosis than to the principles of\n academic discourse. This paper commences with an overview of the\n origins of the academic career and the doctoral degree. Thereafter,\n it introspects the requirements to be a successful academic\n researcher. Aspects of the academic researcher’s agency in relation\n to personal values, characteristics, integrity, research uptake\n skills, as well as the benefits and challenges of a research career\n are explored. By unpacking the salient elements of what is required\n to be a successful academic researcher, this paper provides a basis\n for those who are considering a career in academe to make an\n assessment if such a pursuit is feasible. In addition, the paper\n provides a yardstick by which early or even mid‑career academic\n researchers may judge their progress towards being a successful\n researcher, thereby identifying areas for improvement.","PeriodicalId":38532,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/jbrm.17.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research is central to the life of the career academic. However, the framework in which academic research is conducted is not generally well understood and neither is it often articulated or discussed. The literature tends to rather focus on issues in relation to specific research methodologies and the evaluation thereof. Additionally, previous research argues that it is common for university academics to have little or no formal preparation for their role as teachers. This paper posits that the same applies to that of the academic’s role as a researcher. It cannot be assumed that the mere obtaining of a Doctoral degree, prepares the novice academic for a research career. Early career academics are expected to acquire an understanding of how to survive as a researcher through a process more related to osmosis than to the principles of academic discourse. This paper commences with an overview of the origins of the academic career and the doctoral degree. Thereafter, it introspects the requirements to be a successful academic researcher. Aspects of the academic researcher’s agency in relation to personal values, characteristics, integrity, research uptake skills, as well as the benefits and challenges of a research career are explored. By unpacking the salient elements of what is required to be a successful academic researcher, this paper provides a basis for those who are considering a career in academe to make an assessment if such a pursuit is feasible. In addition, the paper provides a yardstick by which early or even mid‑career academic researchers may judge their progress towards being a successful researcher, thereby identifying areas for improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成为一名成功的学术研究者的思考
研究是学术生涯的核心。然而,进行学术研究的框架通常不被很好地理解,也不经常被阐明或讨论。文献倾向于关注与具体研究方法及其评价有关的问题。此外,先前的研究认为,大学学者很少或根本没有为他们的教师角色做正式的准备是很常见的。本文认为,这同样适用于学者作为研究人员的角色。不能认为仅仅获得博士学位就能使学术新手从事研究工作。作为一名研究人员,早期职业学者应该通过一个更接近于渗透而不是学术话语原则的过程来获得如何生存的理解。本文首先概述了学术生涯和博士学位的起源。然后,反思了成为一名成功的学术研究者的要求。学术研究机构的各个方面与个人价值观、特征、诚信、研究吸收技能以及研究事业的利益和挑战有关。通过揭示成为一名成功的学术研究者所需要的突出因素,本文为那些正在考虑从事学术事业的人提供了一个基础,以评估这种追求是否可行。此外,本文提供了一个标准,早期甚至中期职业生涯的学术研究人员可以判断他们的进展,以成为一个成功的研究者,从而确定需要改进的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods (EJBRM) provides perspectives on topics relevant to research methods applied in the field of business and management. Through its publication the journal contributes to the development of theory and practice. The journal accepts academically robust papers that contribute to the area of research methods applied in business and management research. Papers submitted to the journal are double-blind reviewed by members of the reviewer committee or other suitably qualified readers. The Editor reserves the right to reject papers that, in the view of the editorial board, are either of insufficient quality, or are not relevant enough to the subject area. The editor is happy to discuss contributions before submission. The journal publishes work in the categories described below. Research Papers: These may be qualitative or quantitative, empirical or theoretical in nature and can discuss completed research findings or work in progress. Case Studies: Case studies are welcomed illustrating business and management research methods in practise. View Points: View points are less academically rigorous articles usually in areas of controversy which will fuel some interesting debate. Conference Reports and Book Reviews: Anyone who attends a conference or reads a book that they feel contributes to the area of Business Research Methods is encouraged to submit a review for publication.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Endogeneity: A Systematic Review of Methodologies in Digital Leadership and Remote Work Research Double Bias of Mistakes: Essence, Consequences, and Measurement Method Statistically Validating a Theory Represented by a Venn Diagram How Cognitive Biases Influence Problematic Research Methods Practices Using Mixed Methods to Understand Tax Compliance Behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1