Differentiation of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme and Radiation Necrosis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computerized Approaches: A Review

Rohit Paradkar
{"title":"Differentiation of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme and Radiation Necrosis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computerized Approaches: A Review","authors":"Rohit Paradkar","doi":"10.18662/brain/13.4/373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor originating from glial cells that is a subset of higher-grade gliomas (HGG). Given the extreme malignancy of GBM and HGG, radiotherapy is often used to shrink tumor and inhibit tumor cell function. Despite the use of radiotherapy, GBM recurrence rates remain high, and complications, such as radiation necrosis, can arise. Recurrent GBM and radiation necrosis are nearly indistinguishable using current imaging techniques, which is a considerable challenge in management of GBM treatment. Radiation necrosis is treated conservatively using corticosteroids while recurrent GBM requires aggressive treatments given its markedly short prognosis. Currently, invasive biopsy is the only available method for accurate differentiation of recurrent GBM from radiation necrosis. Clearly, noninvasive differentiation techniques are imperative to effective clinical decision-making surrounding GBM treatment. Many studies have attempted to use conventional MRI, advanced MRI parameters, modalities, and techniques, and machine learning methods to solve this crucial problem. In this review, we attempt to overview the difficulty of differential diagnosis and analyze the current state of knowledge on image-based differentiation approaches utilizing MRI. We identify major gaps in the research and make suggestions to improve current tactics and direct future investigations.","PeriodicalId":44081,"journal":{"name":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.4/373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor originating from glial cells that is a subset of higher-grade gliomas (HGG). Given the extreme malignancy of GBM and HGG, radiotherapy is often used to shrink tumor and inhibit tumor cell function. Despite the use of radiotherapy, GBM recurrence rates remain high, and complications, such as radiation necrosis, can arise. Recurrent GBM and radiation necrosis are nearly indistinguishable using current imaging techniques, which is a considerable challenge in management of GBM treatment. Radiation necrosis is treated conservatively using corticosteroids while recurrent GBM requires aggressive treatments given its markedly short prognosis. Currently, invasive biopsy is the only available method for accurate differentiation of recurrent GBM from radiation necrosis. Clearly, noninvasive differentiation techniques are imperative to effective clinical decision-making surrounding GBM treatment. Many studies have attempted to use conventional MRI, advanced MRI parameters, modalities, and techniques, and machine learning methods to solve this crucial problem. In this review, we attempt to overview the difficulty of differential diagnosis and analyze the current state of knowledge on image-based differentiation approaches utilizing MRI. We identify major gaps in the research and make suggestions to improve current tactics and direct future investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振成像和计算机方法鉴别复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤和放射性坏死:综述
多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种起源于胶质细胞的高度侵袭性脑肿瘤,是高级别胶质瘤(HGG)的一个亚群。由于GBM和HGG的恶性程度极高,通常采用放疗来缩小肿瘤,抑制肿瘤细胞功能。尽管使用放射治疗,GBM复发率仍然很高,并可能出现并发症,如放射性坏死。目前的影像学技术几乎无法区分复发性GBM和放射性坏死,这是GBM治疗管理的一个相当大的挑战。放射性坏死采用皮质类固醇保守治疗,而复发性GBM由于预后明显较短,需要积极治疗。目前,浸润性活检是准确区分复发性GBM与放射性坏死的唯一方法。显然,无创鉴别技术是必要的有效的临床决策围绕GBM治疗。许多研究试图使用传统的MRI,先进的MRI参数,模式和技术,以及机器学习方法来解决这个关键问题。在这篇综述中,我们试图概述鉴别诊断的困难,并分析利用MRI基于图像的鉴别方法的知识现状。我们确定了研究中的主要差距,并提出了改进当前策略和指导未来调查的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
47.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychological Complications During Military Operations in Ukraine: Neurobiological Effects Results of the Implementation of a Comprehensive Socio-Psychological Program to Foster Professional Empathy Among Professionals in the Helping Professions Can Neural Networks Enhance Physics Simulations? National Strategy of Information Society in the Realities of Ukraine Document Image Binarization Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1