A study on the comparison of minimally invasive surfactant therapy with insure technique of surfactant therapy in preterm babies with respiratory distress in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective cohort study

Andra Akhila, B. Ghoshal, N. Mahapatra
{"title":"A study on the comparison of minimally invasive surfactant therapy with insure technique of surfactant therapy in preterm babies with respiratory distress in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective cohort study","authors":"Andra Akhila, B. Ghoshal, N. Mahapatra","doi":"10.32677/ijch.v8i10.3097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a common problem in preterm babies due to surfactant deficiency. Initially, babies were given surfactant therapy by intubation, surfactant administration, and extubation (INSURE) method. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is a novel method of surfactant administration without intubation to spontaneously breathing preterm babies with RDS without the removal of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Aim: This study aims to compare the surfactant therapy in preterm babies with RDS through MIST and INSURE technique. Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in the neonatology unit of Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital. A total of 212 preterm babies of <37 weeks of gestation with features of RDS, who require surfactant are taken and divided into two groups. Very sick babies with congenital anomalies are excluded from the study. In MIST group (n=102), 8 Fr feeding tube is used to deliver surfactant while the baby is on CPAP. In INSURE group (n=102), surfactant is given by intubation through endotracheal tube without CPAP and extubated. Results: Mean birth weight was 1.26 kg in MIST and 1.22 kg in INSURE. Mean gestational age was 31.33 weeks in MIST and 31.11 weeks in INSURE. It was observed that there is a significant difference in terms of duration of oxygen requirement, neonatal intensive care unit stay, and surfactant spillage during administration in MIST group compared to INSURE group. However, duration of mechanical ventilation, CPAP, number of doses of surfactant, sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and mortality did not show significant difference in both the groups. Conclusion: MIST is safe, feasible, and more beneficial than INSURE technique.","PeriodicalId":22476,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of child health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32677/ijch.v8i10.3097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a common problem in preterm babies due to surfactant deficiency. Initially, babies were given surfactant therapy by intubation, surfactant administration, and extubation (INSURE) method. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is a novel method of surfactant administration without intubation to spontaneously breathing preterm babies with RDS without the removal of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Aim: This study aims to compare the surfactant therapy in preterm babies with RDS through MIST and INSURE technique. Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in the neonatology unit of Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital. A total of 212 preterm babies of <37 weeks of gestation with features of RDS, who require surfactant are taken and divided into two groups. Very sick babies with congenital anomalies are excluded from the study. In MIST group (n=102), 8 Fr feeding tube is used to deliver surfactant while the baby is on CPAP. In INSURE group (n=102), surfactant is given by intubation through endotracheal tube without CPAP and extubated. Results: Mean birth weight was 1.26 kg in MIST and 1.22 kg in INSURE. Mean gestational age was 31.33 weeks in MIST and 31.11 weeks in INSURE. It was observed that there is a significant difference in terms of duration of oxygen requirement, neonatal intensive care unit stay, and surfactant spillage during administration in MIST group compared to INSURE group. However, duration of mechanical ventilation, CPAP, number of doses of surfactant, sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and mortality did not show significant difference in both the groups. Conclusion: MIST is safe, feasible, and more beneficial than INSURE technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创表面活性剂治疗与表面活性剂治疗在三级医院早产儿呼吸窘迫的比较研究——一项前瞻性队列研究
背景:呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)是由于表面活性剂缺乏引起的早产儿常见问题。最初,婴儿通过插管、表面活性剂给药和拔管(INSURE)方法给予表面活性剂治疗。微创表面活性剂治疗(MIST)是一种无需插管给药的新方法,用于自主呼吸的RDS早产儿,无需移除持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。目的:通过MIST和INSURE技术比较表面活性剂治疗早产儿RDS的效果。方法:这项前瞻性、观察性队列研究在加尔各答国立医学院和医院新生儿科进行。选取212例妊娠期<37周且有RDS特征且需要表面活性剂的早产儿分为两组。患有先天性畸形的重病婴儿被排除在研究之外。MIST组(n=102)在CPAP治疗期间使用8fr饲管输送表面活性剂。INSURE组(n=102)经气管插管给予表面活性剂,不加CPAP,拔管。结果:MIST组平均出生体重1.26 kg, INSURE组平均出生体重1.22 kg。平均胎龄为31.33周,平均胎龄为31.11周。观察到,与INSURE组相比,MIST组在给药期间的需氧量、新生儿重症监护病房住院时间和表面活性剂溢出方面存在显著差异。然而,机械通气时间、CPAP、表面活性物质剂量、败血症、脑室内出血、早产儿视网膜病变、气胸、支气管肺发育不良和死亡率在两组间无显著差异。结论:MIST技术安全、可行,且比INSURE技术更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and etiopathological profile of pancytopenia in children (1-18 years): A study from tertiary care center of Bundelkhand region, central India Urinary tract infection in pediatric patients – Recent updates Pediatric autism spectrum disorder: Role of yoga prana vidya system as complementary medicine in accelerating patient progress An observational study to evaluate weight gain of exclusively breastfed infants who feed only while sleeping Fibular hemimelia in a neonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1