The Rashomon effect: which features of a speaker’s talk do listeners notice?

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Classroom Discourse Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI:10.1080/19463014.2021.1923540
P. Seedhouse, M. Satar
{"title":"The Rashomon effect: which features of a speaker’s talk do listeners notice?","authors":"P. Seedhouse, M. Satar","doi":"10.1080/19463014.2021.1923540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The same L2 speaking performance may be analysed and evaluated in very different ways by different teachers or raters. We present a new, technology-assisted research design which opens up to investigation the trajectories of convergence and divergence between raters. We tracked and recorded what different raters noticed when, whilst grading a speaker’s videoed talk in the IELTS Speaking Test. We devised graphs of the ‘noticing trajectories’ of raters to compare the relative degrees of convergence and divergence between all raters at any point. The possible reasons for convergence/divergence were elicited using stimulated recall interviews. We found that raters’ noticing and rating tended to converge in relation to easily identifiable features such as idioms. However, for some stretches of speaker talk, there was clear divergence in terms of features noticed and rated by raters; in real IELTS tests, a background score-monitoring system deals with divergence. The research design enables delicate depiction of how the process of rater convergence/divergence unfolds over time. Applications are suggested in terms of examiner training, as well as for classroom discourse research and CA data workshops.","PeriodicalId":45350,"journal":{"name":"Classroom Discourse","volume":"46 1","pages":"1 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classroom Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1923540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The same L2 speaking performance may be analysed and evaluated in very different ways by different teachers or raters. We present a new, technology-assisted research design which opens up to investigation the trajectories of convergence and divergence between raters. We tracked and recorded what different raters noticed when, whilst grading a speaker’s videoed talk in the IELTS Speaking Test. We devised graphs of the ‘noticing trajectories’ of raters to compare the relative degrees of convergence and divergence between all raters at any point. The possible reasons for convergence/divergence were elicited using stimulated recall interviews. We found that raters’ noticing and rating tended to converge in relation to easily identifiable features such as idioms. However, for some stretches of speaker talk, there was clear divergence in terms of features noticed and rated by raters; in real IELTS tests, a background score-monitoring system deals with divergence. The research design enables delicate depiction of how the process of rater convergence/divergence unfolds over time. Applications are suggested in terms of examiner training, as well as for classroom discourse research and CA data workshops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗生门效应:听众会注意到演讲者讲话的哪些特点?
相同的第二语言口语表现可能会被不同的老师或评分者以非常不同的方式分析和评估。我们提出了一个新的,技术辅助的研究设计,它打开了调查的收敛和分歧的轨迹之间的评级。我们跟踪并记录了不同的评分者在给雅思口语考试中演讲者的视频演讲评分时所注意到的。我们设计了评分者“注意轨迹”的图表,以比较所有评分者在任何点上的相对收敛和分歧程度。趋同/分化的可能原因是通过刺激回忆访谈得出的。我们发现,评分者的注意和评分倾向于在容易识别的特征(如成语)上收敛。然而,对于演讲者的某些演讲片段,评分者在注意到的特征和评分方面存在明显的分歧;在真正的雅思考试中,一个后台分数监控系统处理分歧。研究设计能够精确地描述随着时间的推移,更大的收敛/发散过程是如何展开的。建议将其应用于考官培训,以及课堂话语研究和CA数据研讨会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Classroom Discourse
Classroom Discourse EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Examining authorial agency in elementary children’s narratives Analysing educational dialogue around shared artefacts in technology-mediated contexts: a new coding framework The embodied nature of students’ engagement and participation during a total physical response activity Collaborative character searches in L2 Chinese peer writing: sequential design and object affordances Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: a discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1