Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses

Johannus Q. de Korte, C. Bongers, M. Catoire, B. Kingma, T. Eijsvogels
{"title":"Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses","authors":"Johannus Q. de Korte, C. Bongers, M. Catoire, B. Kingma, T. Eijsvogels","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2020.1868386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cooling vests alleviate heat strain. We quantified the perceptual and physiological heat strain and assessed the effects of wearing a 21°C phase change material cooling vest on these measures during work shifts of COVID-19 nurses wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). Seventeen nurses were monitored on two working days, consisting of a control (PPE only) and a cooling vest day (PPE + cooling vest). Sub-PPE air temperature, gastrointestinal temperature (Tgi), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Thermal comfort (2 [1–4] versus 1 [1–2], pcondtition < 0.001) and thermal sensation (5 [4–7] versus 4 [2–7], pcondition < 0.001) improved in the cooling vest versus control condition. Only 18% of nurses reported thermal discomfort and 36% a (slightly) warm thermal sensation in the cooling vest condition versus 81% and 94% in the control condition (OR (95%CI) 0.05 (0.01–0.29) and 0.04 (<0.01–0.35), respectively). Accordingly, perceptual strain index was lower in the cooling vest versus control condition (5.7 ± 1.5 versus 4.3 ± 1.7, pcondition < 0.001, respectively). No differences were observed for the physiological heat strain index Tgi and rating of perceived exertion across conditions. Average HR was slightly lower in the cooling vest versus the control condition (85 ± 12 versus 87 ± 11, pcondition = 0.025). Although the physiological heat strain among nurses using PPE was limited, substantial perceptual heat strain was experienced. A 21°C phase change material cooling vest can successfully alleviate the perceptual heat strain encountered by nurses wearing PPE.","PeriodicalId":22565,"journal":{"name":"Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":"103 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1868386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cooling vests alleviate heat strain. We quantified the perceptual and physiological heat strain and assessed the effects of wearing a 21°C phase change material cooling vest on these measures during work shifts of COVID-19 nurses wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). Seventeen nurses were monitored on two working days, consisting of a control (PPE only) and a cooling vest day (PPE + cooling vest). Sub-PPE air temperature, gastrointestinal temperature (Tgi), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Thermal comfort (2 [1–4] versus 1 [1–2], pcondtition < 0.001) and thermal sensation (5 [4–7] versus 4 [2–7], pcondition < 0.001) improved in the cooling vest versus control condition. Only 18% of nurses reported thermal discomfort and 36% a (slightly) warm thermal sensation in the cooling vest condition versus 81% and 94% in the control condition (OR (95%CI) 0.05 (0.01–0.29) and 0.04 (<0.01–0.35), respectively). Accordingly, perceptual strain index was lower in the cooling vest versus control condition (5.7 ± 1.5 versus 4.3 ± 1.7, pcondition < 0.001, respectively). No differences were observed for the physiological heat strain index Tgi and rating of perceived exertion across conditions. Average HR was slightly lower in the cooling vest versus the control condition (85 ± 12 versus 87 ± 11, pcondition = 0.025). Although the physiological heat strain among nurses using PPE was limited, substantial perceptual heat strain was experienced. A 21°C phase change material cooling vest can successfully alleviate the perceptual heat strain encountered by nurses wearing PPE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降温背心可缓解COVID-19护士感知的感性热应激
冷却背心减轻热负荷。我们量化了穿着个人防护装备(PPE)的COVID-19护士在轮班期间的感知和生理热应变,并评估了穿着21°C相变材料冷却背心对这些措施的影响。对17名护士进行2个工作日的监测,包括对照组(仅PPE)和降温背心日(PPE +降温背心)。连续测量亚ppe温度、胃肠温度(Tgi)和心率(HR)。热舒适(2[1 - 4]对1[1 - 2],条件< 0.001)和热感觉(5[4 - 7]对4[2 - 7],条件< 0.001)在冷却背心与对照组相比有所改善。在降温背心条件下,只有18%的护士报告了热不适,36%的护士报告了(轻微)温暖的热感觉,而在对照组条件下,分别有81%和94% (OR (95%CI) 0.05(0.01-0.29)和0.04(< 0.01-0.35))。因此,与对照组相比,冷却背心组的感知应变指数更低(5.7±1.5比4.3±1.7,p条件< 0.001)。在不同条件下,生理热应变指数Tgi和感知劳累等级无差异。冷却背心组的平均心率略低于对照组(85±12比87±11,p条件= 0.025)。虽然使用防护用品的护士的生理性热应变有限,但存在大量的感性热应变。21°C相变材料冷却背心可以成功缓解护士佩戴PPE时遇到的感知热应变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The multifaceted benefits of passive heat therapies for extending the healthspan: A comprehensive review with a focus on Finnish sauna Thermoregulation in mice: The road to understanding torpor hypothermia and the shortcomings of a circuit for generating fever Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses Divers risk accelerated fatigue and core temperature rise during fully-immersed exercise in warmer water temperature extremes Prolonged self-paced exercise in the heat – environmental factors affecting performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1