Problems of Intellectual Piracy and Counterfeiting in the EAEU Countries

T. Kanatov
{"title":"Problems of Intellectual Piracy and Counterfeiting in the EAEU Countries","authors":"T. Kanatov","doi":"10.18572/2072-4322-2021-1-29-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the problematic issues of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EEU countries. Analyzed international instruments, given the statistics in the context of the EEC according to the ECA, the FCS, the types of the main groups of counterfeit goods moved across the customs border, the issues of online trading of counterfeit products, given the statistics of the market size of counterfeit products. The legal characteristics of the concepts of «counterfeit», «intellectual piracy» from the point of view of legislation, doctrine and practice are given. In order to prevent offenses, special tables of «counterfeit indices» developed by the Russian Anti-Piracy Organization to help law enforcement agencies and copyright holders, which allows them to independently identify counterfeit copies without the involvement of experts, as well as the table of the Moscow Center for Independent Comprehensive Examination and Certification of Systems and Technologies, which proposed to use a system of criteria for protecting computer disks with computer programs from counterfeiting according to certain criteria, are considered. Purpose. To investigate current problematic issues of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EAEU countries. Methodology: system-structural, concrete-sociological, historical-legal, social-legal, comparative-legal, statistical methods of work were used in writing the article. Results. Proposals and conclusions based on the analysis of international legislation, as well as regulatory legal acts of the EAEU countries that were in force at the moment. The relevance and practical significance of the article lies in the analysis of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EAEU countries. The special significance of this study lies in the fact that the developed theoretical provisions of this work can be used in the future for further study and consideration of issues related to counterfeiting and intellectual piracy in the doctrine and legislation of the EAEU countries. With this research, the author invests a significant resource in the theoretical part of civil law. Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, as it is one of the first attempts to consider topical issues of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EAEU countries.","PeriodicalId":88929,"journal":{"name":"Marquette intellectual property law review","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marquette intellectual property law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4322-2021-1-29-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the problematic issues of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EEU countries. Analyzed international instruments, given the statistics in the context of the EEC according to the ECA, the FCS, the types of the main groups of counterfeit goods moved across the customs border, the issues of online trading of counterfeit products, given the statistics of the market size of counterfeit products. The legal characteristics of the concepts of «counterfeit», «intellectual piracy» from the point of view of legislation, doctrine and practice are given. In order to prevent offenses, special tables of «counterfeit indices» developed by the Russian Anti-Piracy Organization to help law enforcement agencies and copyright holders, which allows them to independently identify counterfeit copies without the involvement of experts, as well as the table of the Moscow Center for Independent Comprehensive Examination and Certification of Systems and Technologies, which proposed to use a system of criteria for protecting computer disks with computer programs from counterfeiting according to certain criteria, are considered. Purpose. To investigate current problematic issues of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EAEU countries. Methodology: system-structural, concrete-sociological, historical-legal, social-legal, comparative-legal, statistical methods of work were used in writing the article. Results. Proposals and conclusions based on the analysis of international legislation, as well as regulatory legal acts of the EAEU countries that were in force at the moment. The relevance and practical significance of the article lies in the analysis of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EAEU countries. The special significance of this study lies in the fact that the developed theoretical provisions of this work can be used in the future for further study and consideration of issues related to counterfeiting and intellectual piracy in the doctrine and legislation of the EAEU countries. With this research, the author invests a significant resource in the theoretical part of civil law. Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, as it is one of the first attempts to consider topical issues of intellectual piracy and counterfeiting in the EAEU countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧亚经济联盟国家的知识产权盗版和假冒问题
本文讨论了欧亚经济联盟国家存在的知识产权盗版和假冒问题。分析了国际文书,在欧共体的背景下根据ECA的统计数据,FCS,假冒商品的主要群体的类型,假冒产品的在线交易问题,假冒产品的市场规模的统计数据。从立法、理论和实践的角度分析了“假冒”、“知识盗版”概念的法律特征。为了防止违法行为,俄罗斯反盗版组织开发的特殊“假冒指数”表,以帮助执法机构和版权所有者,使他们能够在没有专家参与的情况下独立识别假冒副本,以及莫斯科系统和技术独立综合检查和认证中心的表。其中,建议采用一套标准体系,根据一定的标准保护装有计算机程序的计算机磁盘不被仿冒。目的。调查欧亚经济联盟国家目前存在的盗版和假冒问题。方法:在撰写文章时使用了系统结构,具体社会学,历史法学,社会法学,比较法学,统计学的工作方法。结果。基于对国际立法的分析,以及目前有效的欧亚经济联盟国家的监管法律行为的建议和结论。本文的相关性和现实意义在于分析欧亚经济联盟国家的知识产权盗版和假冒问题。本研究的特殊意义在于,本工作所形成的理论规定可为今后进一步研究和思考欧亚经济联盟各国在理论和立法中涉及假冒和知识产权盗版的问题提供借鉴。这一研究是笔者在民法理论部分投入的重要资源。新颖性/原创性/价值:这篇文章具有很高的科学价值,因为它是第一次尝试考虑欧亚经济联盟国家的知识产权盗版和假冒问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intellectual Property Institution in the Cultural-Historical and Strategic Mode Accounting of Intangible Assets and Their Reflection in Corporate Reporting in Conditions of Digital Transformation Artificial Intelligence in the Future Law Enforcement Officers Training System Roadmap for the Development of Competition in Science and Higher Education as a Tool to Eliminate Barriers to the Growth of Competitiveness of Russian Science on Global Markets Intellectual Property Issues in Video Games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1