The Specific Uses of the Rorschach in Clinical Practice

Q3 Psychology Rorschachiana Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1027/1192-5604/a000155
J. L. Mihura, C. Jowers, Nicolae Dumitrascu, Alicia W. Villanueva van den Hurk, Philip J. Keddy
{"title":"The Specific Uses of the Rorschach in Clinical Practice","authors":"J. L. Mihura, C. Jowers, Nicolae Dumitrascu, Alicia W. Villanueva van den Hurk, Philip J. Keddy","doi":"10.1027/1192-5604/a000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Our study addresses the question, “In what settings, with what age groups, and for what purposes is the Rorschach used internationally?” We present preliminary results from 342 Rorschach users representing 36 different countries from a survey created as part of the US contribution to a larger international project on teaching and using the Rorschach in different countries. The survey was distributed to R-PAS account holders with a request to forward to non-R-PAS users. Of the respondents, 80% used R-PAS, 35% used the CS, and 17% used both. Overall, 91% used the Rorschach with adults, and 43% and 69% with children and adolescents, respectively. The most common setting was private practice (63%). The most common reason for using the Rorschach was differential diagnosis (65%), with psychosis (58%) and personality disorders (56%) as the main diagnoses. US respondents were more likely to use the Rorschach to assess for psychosis (65% vs. 48%), especially emerging psychosis in adolescents (46% vs. 25%). We discuss the strong meta-analytic support for using the Rorschach to assess psychosis, a use supported by even the test’s staunchest critics. We close by discussing study limitations and future directions, such as translating the survey to different languages and implementing a wider distribution.","PeriodicalId":39365,"journal":{"name":"Rorschachiana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rorschachiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Our study addresses the question, “In what settings, with what age groups, and for what purposes is the Rorschach used internationally?” We present preliminary results from 342 Rorschach users representing 36 different countries from a survey created as part of the US contribution to a larger international project on teaching and using the Rorschach in different countries. The survey was distributed to R-PAS account holders with a request to forward to non-R-PAS users. Of the respondents, 80% used R-PAS, 35% used the CS, and 17% used both. Overall, 91% used the Rorschach with adults, and 43% and 69% with children and adolescents, respectively. The most common setting was private practice (63%). The most common reason for using the Rorschach was differential diagnosis (65%), with psychosis (58%) and personality disorders (56%) as the main diagnoses. US respondents were more likely to use the Rorschach to assess for psychosis (65% vs. 48%), especially emerging psychosis in adolescents (46% vs. 25%). We discuss the strong meta-analytic support for using the Rorschach to assess psychosis, a use supported by even the test’s staunchest critics. We close by discussing study limitations and future directions, such as translating the survey to different languages and implementing a wider distribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗夏墨迹测验在临床实践中的具体应用
摘要我们的研究解决了这样一个问题:“罗夏墨迹测验在什么样的环境下,针对什么样的年龄组,用于什么样的目的?”我们展示了来自36个不同国家的342名罗夏墨迹使用者的初步调查结果,该调查是美国对一个在不同国家教学和使用罗夏墨迹的大型国际项目的一部分贡献。该调查分发给R-PAS帐户持有人,并要求将其转发给非R-PAS用户。在受访者中,80%使用R-PAS, 35%使用CS, 17%两者都使用。总的来说,91%的人用罗夏墨迹测试成人,43%和69%的人用罗夏墨迹测试儿童和青少年。最常见的环境是私人诊所(63%)。使用罗夏墨迹测试最常见的原因是鉴别诊断(65%),主要诊断为精神病(58%)和人格障碍(56%)。美国受访者更倾向于使用罗夏墨迹来评估精神病(65%对48%),尤其是青少年的新发精神病(46%对25%)。我们讨论了强有力的元分析支持使用罗夏墨迹测试来评估精神病,这种使用甚至得到了测试最坚定的批评者的支持。最后,我们讨论了研究的局限性和未来的方向,例如将调查翻译成不同的语言并实现更广泛的分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rorschachiana
Rorschachiana Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
When Inkblot Imitates Life – A Case Study of Rorschach Content Analysis The Processometric Consensus Rorschach Test (pCRT-II) – An Improved Evaluation System The Parallel Series – The Behn–Rorschach Inkblot Test The Parallel Series – The Behn–Rorschach Inkblot Test Seeing Eye-to-Eye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1