Estrutura Interna e Fidedignidade das Escalas de Locusde Controle: Uma Scoping Review

L. W. M. Couto, M. N. Baptista
{"title":"Estrutura Interna e Fidedignidade das Escalas de Locusde Controle: Uma Scoping Review","authors":"L. W. M. Couto, M. N. Baptista","doi":"10.9788/cp2022.1-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locus of control refers to how individuals perceive control in their lives and based on this perception, guides the motivation for their action, which can be internal or external. The locus of control, throughout more than 50 years of research, proved to be useful as a predictor attribute of individual diff erences and –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––* Correspondência: Leila Maria Ferreira Couto. Rua das Quaresmeiras, 162, Residencial Jardim das Palmeiras, Bosque, 13283-504, Vinhedo – SP, Brasil. Fones: (19) 3030-0721; (19) 99897-1977. leilamfc@terra.com.br. Este trabalho contou com o apoio fi nanceiro da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES. Couto, L. M. F., Baptista, M. N.2Cadernos de Psicologia, Ribeirão Preto, vol. 2, nº 1, p. 1-27 - Abril/2022has motivated the construction of diff erent scales for both, generalized and specifi c control expectations. However, these scales were constructed in the 1960s and 1970s using less advanced statistical methods than today, which may have generated inconsistent replication results of validity evidence regarding the internal structure of these instruments. The aim of this study was, from a scoping review, to investigate these psychometric properties of scales with generalized control expectations for adults. Forty-seven studies were selected that included analyzes of three scales: Rotter’s I-E Scale (1966), Levenson’s I-P-C Scale (1973, 1974), and Oviedo Locus of Control Scale from Suárez-Álvarez et al. (2016). The results pointed out gaps in the I-E and I-P-C scales, as well as recommendation of new studies with Oviedo Locus of Control Scale. Study limitations and suggestions for further investigations are discussed.","PeriodicalId":33882,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9788/cp2022.1-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Locus of control refers to how individuals perceive control in their lives and based on this perception, guides the motivation for their action, which can be internal or external. The locus of control, throughout more than 50 years of research, proved to be useful as a predictor attribute of individual diff erences and –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––* Correspondência: Leila Maria Ferreira Couto. Rua das Quaresmeiras, 162, Residencial Jardim das Palmeiras, Bosque, 13283-504, Vinhedo – SP, Brasil. Fones: (19) 3030-0721; (19) 99897-1977. leilamfc@terra.com.br. Este trabalho contou com o apoio fi nanceiro da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES. Couto, L. M. F., Baptista, M. N.2Cadernos de Psicologia, Ribeirão Preto, vol. 2, nº 1, p. 1-27 - Abril/2022has motivated the construction of diff erent scales for both, generalized and specifi c control expectations. However, these scales were constructed in the 1960s and 1970s using less advanced statistical methods than today, which may have generated inconsistent replication results of validity evidence regarding the internal structure of these instruments. The aim of this study was, from a scoping review, to investigate these psychometric properties of scales with generalized control expectations for adults. Forty-seven studies were selected that included analyzes of three scales: Rotter’s I-E Scale (1966), Levenson’s I-P-C Scale (1973, 1974), and Oviedo Locus of Control Scale from Suárez-Álvarez et al. (2016). The results pointed out gaps in the I-E and I-P-C scales, as well as recommendation of new studies with Oviedo Locus of Control Scale. Study limitations and suggestions for further investigations are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制点量表的内部结构和可靠性:一项抽样综述
控制点是指个体如何感知生活中的控制,并基于这种感知来指导他们行动的动机,这种动机可以是内部的或外部的。经过50多年的研究,控制点被证明是有用的个体差异预测属性–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––* Correspondência: Leila Maria Ferreira Couto。Rua das Quaresmeiras, 162,住宅花园das Palmeiras,博斯克,13283-504,Vinhedo - SP,巴西。电话:(19)3030-0721;(19) 99897 - 1977。leilamfc@terra.com.br。Este trabalho contou com to apopoio io财务数据协调,高级财务数据协调,高级财务数据协调,高级财务数据协调- CAPES。Couto, L. M. F., Baptista, M. n .2《心理学研究》,ribebe o Preto, vol. 2, n . 1, p. 1-27 - Abril/2022 -已经推动了广义和特定控制期望的不同尺度的构建。然而,这些量表是在20世纪60年代和70年代构建的,使用的统计方法不如今天先进,这可能会产生关于这些工具内部结构的有效性证据的不一致的复制结果。本研究的目的是,从一个范围审查,调查这些心理测量的性质与广义控制期望的量表成人。本研究选取了47项研究,分析了三个量表:Rotter的I-E量表(1966)、Levenson的I-P-C量表(1973、1974)和Oviedo控制源量表(Suárez-Álvarez等人,2016)。研究结果指出了I-E量表和I-P-C量表的不足之处,并建议使用Oviedo控制点量表进行新的研究。讨论了研究的局限性和进一步研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
78 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intensificação laboral e gênero profissional de professoras da educação infantil Relações de gênero e trabalho das mulheres na Cadernos de Psicologia Social e do Trabalho: uma revisão bibliográfica (1998-2018) Percepções de mulheres sobre gestação e os sentidos do trabalho Impactos Psicológicos da Pandemia de Coronavírus (COVID-19) em Profi ssionais de Saúde: Overview Percepção de Estresse em Tempos de Pandemia COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1