Beyond Borders and States: Modelling Ocean Connectivity According to Indigenous Cosmovisions

Q1 Social Sciences Arctic Review on Law and Politics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.23865/arctic.v12.3290
Endalew Lijalem Enyew, M. Poto, Apostolos Tsiouvalas
{"title":"Beyond Borders and States: Modelling Ocean Connectivity According to Indigenous Cosmovisions","authors":"Endalew Lijalem Enyew, M. Poto, Apostolos Tsiouvalas","doi":"10.23865/arctic.v12.3290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes some common features of Indigenous sea cosmovisions (through examples from Oceania and the Arctic region), from which an understanding of ocean governance rooted in the interconnectedness of all life and the importance of protecting water and people emerges. Hence, the model of ocean (or water) connectivity is characterized by the understanding of ocean-human relationships as a continuum of connections between human and non-human elements. In line with the normative recognition of the sacredness of water, the interconnectedness of all life, and the importance of protecting the sea, Indigenous peoples’ law provides insights and implementation solutions for the restoration of marine ecosystems. This study aims to identify blind spots of the current law-of-the-sea regime, where marine ecological connectivity is not fully recognized as a foundational pillar of effective ocean protection. It also suggests approaches towards knowledge integration mechanisms that could minimize critical issues in ocean governance by enabling the enshrinement of Indigenous nature-oriented approaches within the law of the sea regulatory framework (especially focusing on the high seas’ regime). The work is structured into three main parts: a comprehensive overview of connectivity conceptualizations drawn from Indigenous cosmovisions; reflections on the model’s capability to address law-of-the-sea’s systemic challenges; and concluding reflections on possible future trajectories in law-of-the-sea that could encompass elements of the analyzed model.","PeriodicalId":36694,"journal":{"name":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v12.3290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article describes some common features of Indigenous sea cosmovisions (through examples from Oceania and the Arctic region), from which an understanding of ocean governance rooted in the interconnectedness of all life and the importance of protecting water and people emerges. Hence, the model of ocean (or water) connectivity is characterized by the understanding of ocean-human relationships as a continuum of connections between human and non-human elements. In line with the normative recognition of the sacredness of water, the interconnectedness of all life, and the importance of protecting the sea, Indigenous peoples’ law provides insights and implementation solutions for the restoration of marine ecosystems. This study aims to identify blind spots of the current law-of-the-sea regime, where marine ecological connectivity is not fully recognized as a foundational pillar of effective ocean protection. It also suggests approaches towards knowledge integration mechanisms that could minimize critical issues in ocean governance by enabling the enshrinement of Indigenous nature-oriented approaches within the law of the sea regulatory framework (especially focusing on the high seas’ regime). The work is structured into three main parts: a comprehensive overview of connectivity conceptualizations drawn from Indigenous cosmovisions; reflections on the model’s capability to address law-of-the-sea’s systemic challenges; and concluding reflections on possible future trajectories in law-of-the-sea that could encompass elements of the analyzed model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越边界和国家:根据土著宇宙观模拟海洋连通性
本文描述了土著海洋世界观的一些共同特征(通过大洋洲和北极地区的例子),由此产生了对植根于所有生命相互联系以及保护水和人的重要性的海洋治理的理解。因此,海洋(或水)连通性模型的特点是将海洋与人类的关系理解为人类与非人类因素之间联系的连续体。根据对水的神圣性、所有生命的相互关联性以及保护海洋重要性的规范性认识,土著人民的法律为恢复海洋生态系统提供了见解和实施解决方案。本研究旨在找出现行海洋法制度的盲点,即没有充分认识到海洋生态连通性是有效海洋保护的基础支柱。报告还提出了建立知识整合机制的办法,这些办法可以使土著面向自然的办法纳入海洋法管理框架(特别注重公海制度),从而最大限度地减少海洋治理中的关键问题。这项工作分为三个主要部分:对来自土著世界观的连通性概念化的全面概述;对该模式应对海洋法系统挑战能力的思考;并总结对可能包含所分析模型要素的未来海洋法轨迹的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Arctic Review on Law and Politics Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Residence Permit Appeals at the Administrative Courts of Finland: Acquiescence Bias by Legalised Judicial Injustices in Finland EU Engagement in the Arctic: Challenges to Achieving Ambitions in an Area outside Its Jurisdiction War in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategies Welcome to Another Demanding and Exiting Year Small States in World Politics: Norwegian Interests and Foreign Policy Challenges in the Arctic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1