Projectifying feminism: exploring the conditions for feminist politics in international development aid

IF 2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Journal of Politics and Gender Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1332/251510821x16467490969176
David Scott, Malin Rönnblom
{"title":"Projectifying feminism: exploring the conditions for feminist politics in international development aid","authors":"David Scott, Malin Rönnblom","doi":"10.1332/251510821x16467490969176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an organisational form, the project poses a challenge today for the possibility of articulating feminist politics, understood as feminist visions and ambitions. With a focus on women’s organisations working in international development aid, we examine how the project format and its managerial attributes shape the possibility of articulating feminist politics. Mobilising assemblage thinking on a material consisting mainly of interviews with project workers in women’s organisations, we show that these organisations engage in assembly work to fit their activism with the project format, such as translating feminist ambitions into bureaucratic procedures and notions of temporality, activating repertoires of expertise, and adopting marketised approaches to development. We conclude that the project format depoliticises feminist politics, although it does not make the articulation of feminist ambitions impossible. Assemblage thinking is suggested as a suitable framework for feminist research when investigating how contemporary governing arrangements influence the articulation of feminist politics.Key messagesThe project format influences how women’s organisations articulate feminist politics.Women’s organisations engage in the work of adaptation and translation to fit feminist politics with the managerial features of the project format, resulting in co-optation and resistance.Assemblage thinking is suggested as a conceptual framework for exploring how feminist politics is shaped by the project format.","PeriodicalId":36315,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821x16467490969176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As an organisational form, the project poses a challenge today for the possibility of articulating feminist politics, understood as feminist visions and ambitions. With a focus on women’s organisations working in international development aid, we examine how the project format and its managerial attributes shape the possibility of articulating feminist politics. Mobilising assemblage thinking on a material consisting mainly of interviews with project workers in women’s organisations, we show that these organisations engage in assembly work to fit their activism with the project format, such as translating feminist ambitions into bureaucratic procedures and notions of temporality, activating repertoires of expertise, and adopting marketised approaches to development. We conclude that the project format depoliticises feminist politics, although it does not make the articulation of feminist ambitions impossible. Assemblage thinking is suggested as a suitable framework for feminist research when investigating how contemporary governing arrangements influence the articulation of feminist politics.Key messagesThe project format influences how women’s organisations articulate feminist politics.Women’s organisations engage in the work of adaptation and translation to fit feminist politics with the managerial features of the project format, resulting in co-optation and resistance.Assemblage thinking is suggested as a conceptual framework for exploring how feminist politics is shaped by the project format.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性主义的投射:探索国际发展援助中女性主义政治的条件
作为一种组织形式,该项目对今天表达女权主义政治的可能性提出了挑战,被理解为女权主义的愿景和抱负。以从事国际发展援助工作的妇女组织为重点,我们研究了项目形式及其管理属性如何塑造表达女权主义政治的可能性。在一份主要由对妇女组织项目工作者的采访组成的材料上,我们调动了集合思维,表明这些组织从事集合工作是为了使他们的行动主义与项目形式相适应,例如将女权主义的雄心转化为官僚程序和暂时性的概念,激活专业技能,并采用市场化的发展方法。我们的结论是,项目形式使女权主义政治非政治化,尽管它并没有使女权主义野心的表达成为不可能。当研究当代治理安排如何影响女性主义政治的表达时,组合思维被认为是女性主义研究的合适框架。项目形式影响妇女组织如何表达女权主义政治。妇女组织为了使女权主义政治与项目形式的管理特征相适应,进行了改编和翻译工作,导致了合作和抵制。组合思维被建议作为一个概念框架来探索女权主义政治是如何被项目形式塑造的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Politics and Gender
European Journal of Politics and Gender Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Translating difference: whiteness, racialisation and queer migration in Berlin Shifting equality from the margins: the Common European Asylum System and the making of trans rights in the European Union Translation as a cultural tool for mediating conflict in queer and feminist grassroots democratic coalitions in Denmark, Germany and Sweden Women’s issues, critical actors and the media: substantive representation of women and gendered media coverage in South Korea How anti-gender and gendered imagery translate the Great Replacement conspiracy theory in online far-right platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1