Teachers’ pass-on practices in whole-class discussions: how teachers return the floor to their students

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Classroom Discourse Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/19463014.2019.1585890
Annerose Willemsen, Myrte N. Gosen, T. Koole, K. de Glopper
{"title":"Teachers’ pass-on practices in whole-class discussions: how teachers return the floor to their students","authors":"Annerose Willemsen, Myrte N. Gosen, T. Koole, K. de Glopper","doi":"10.1080/19463014.2019.1585890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reports on a conversation analytic study into the pass-on turns that teachers produce to return the floor to the class following one student’s contribution, in the context of whole-class discussions around texts in 4th grade history and geography lessons. These pass-on turns are remarkable, as the teachers take the turn in order to convey that they will not be responding, but are instead giving their students the opportunity to do so. Our bottom-up analyses allowed us to identify different practices and their projections, and revealed their effects on the ensuing responses. Whereas minimal pass-on practices do not alter the sequential implications of the preceding student turn and typically lead to responses to the student turn, more elaborate practices do slightly alter the sequential implications and mostly lead to responses to the pass-on turn itself, or to an earlier turn produced by the teacher. The analyses show that, although the pass-on turns seem to sustain the Teacher-Student-Teacher-Student participation pattern, this does not hinder the activity of having a whole-class discussion in which students discuss the topic at hand and critically consider and challenge the contributions of their classmates.","PeriodicalId":45350,"journal":{"name":"Classroom Discourse","volume":"63 1","pages":"297 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classroom Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1585890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reports on a conversation analytic study into the pass-on turns that teachers produce to return the floor to the class following one student’s contribution, in the context of whole-class discussions around texts in 4th grade history and geography lessons. These pass-on turns are remarkable, as the teachers take the turn in order to convey that they will not be responding, but are instead giving their students the opportunity to do so. Our bottom-up analyses allowed us to identify different practices and their projections, and revealed their effects on the ensuing responses. Whereas minimal pass-on practices do not alter the sequential implications of the preceding student turn and typically lead to responses to the student turn, more elaborate practices do slightly alter the sequential implications and mostly lead to responses to the pass-on turn itself, or to an earlier turn produced by the teacher. The analyses show that, although the pass-on turns seem to sustain the Teacher-Student-Teacher-Student participation pattern, this does not hinder the activity of having a whole-class discussion in which students discuss the topic at hand and critically consider and challenge the contributions of their classmates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师在课堂讨论中的传递实践:教师如何将讲台还给学生
摘要:本文以四年级历史和地理课的课文为背景,对教师在学生发言后将发言权归还给班级的行为进行了对话分析研究。这种轮流提问的方式非常引人注目,因为老师们轮流提问是为了传达他们不会回应,而是给学生机会去回应。自下而上的分析使我们能够识别不同的实践和它们的预测,并揭示它们对后续响应的影响。然而,最小的传递练习不会改变前一个学生转身的顺序含义,并且通常会导致对学生转身的反应,更详细的练习会稍微改变顺序含义,并且大多数会导致对传递转身本身的反应,或者对老师制作的更早的转身的反应。分析表明,虽然传递回合似乎维持了教师-学生-教师-学生的参与模式,但这并不妨碍进行全班讨论的活动,在全班讨论中,学生讨论手头的话题,批判性地思考和挑战同学的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Classroom Discourse
Classroom Discourse EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Examining authorial agency in elementary children’s narratives Analysing educational dialogue around shared artefacts in technology-mediated contexts: a new coding framework The embodied nature of students’ engagement and participation during a total physical response activity Collaborative character searches in L2 Chinese peer writing: sequential design and object affordances Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: a discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1