Infektionsrisiko von Frauen für eine COVID-19- Erkrankung während der Pandemie

A. Nienhaus, Madelaine Dulon
{"title":"Infektionsrisiko von Frauen für eine COVID-19- Erkrankung während der Pandemie","authors":"A. Nienhaus, Madelaine Dulon","doi":"10.17147/asu-1-273035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk among women of COVID-19 infection during the pandemic Objective: The proportion of women is increased in occupational SARSCoV-2 infections and is as high as 80 %. Therefore, we investigated whether women have a higher risk of infection than men or whether they carry out more risky tasks. Methods: Existing data from two studies on infection dynamics among staff of two different hospitals were combined, irrespective of occupation, and analysed for possible differences between men and women in terms of infection risk. Primary data were available for this secondary data analysis. Odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals and chi-square tests (95 %-CI) were calculated for the correlation analysis. Results: Data from 1785 employees were available for the evaluation. Women accounted for 74.6 % of the study participants. The proportion of women among the infected participants was 81.7 % (138 out of 169). 7.4 % of men and 10.1 % of women were infected. The infection rate in exposed men was slightly lower than in exposed women (9.8 % and 13.0 %, odds ratios 3.2 [95 %-CI 1.2–8.5] and 3.6 [95 %-CI 2.2–6.0]).For unexposed workers, infection rates barely differed between men and women (3.3 % and 4.0 %). There were only small differences between men and women (16.2 % and 11.2 % respectively) in infection rates after private contact. Conclusions: We found no evidence of an increased risk of infection in women compared to men with a similar level of exposure in the hospital. Keywords: healthcare workers – gender – risk of infection – COVID-19","PeriodicalId":53639,"journal":{"name":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-273035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk among women of COVID-19 infection during the pandemic Objective: The proportion of women is increased in occupational SARSCoV-2 infections and is as high as 80 %. Therefore, we investigated whether women have a higher risk of infection than men or whether they carry out more risky tasks. Methods: Existing data from two studies on infection dynamics among staff of two different hospitals were combined, irrespective of occupation, and analysed for possible differences between men and women in terms of infection risk. Primary data were available for this secondary data analysis. Odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals and chi-square tests (95 %-CI) were calculated for the correlation analysis. Results: Data from 1785 employees were available for the evaluation. Women accounted for 74.6 % of the study participants. The proportion of women among the infected participants was 81.7 % (138 out of 169). 7.4 % of men and 10.1 % of women were infected. The infection rate in exposed men was slightly lower than in exposed women (9.8 % and 13.0 %, odds ratios 3.2 [95 %-CI 1.2–8.5] and 3.6 [95 %-CI 2.2–6.0]).For unexposed workers, infection rates barely differed between men and women (3.3 % and 4.0 %). There were only small differences between men and women (16.2 % and 11.2 % respectively) in infection rates after private contact. Conclusions: We found no evidence of an increased risk of infection in women compared to men with a similar level of exposure in the hospital. Keywords: healthcare workers – gender – risk of infection – COVID-19
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20名女性在流行期间感染covide 19疾病的风险
目的:女性在职业性sars -2感染中的比例有所增加,高达80%。因此,我们调查了女性是否比男性有更高的感染风险,或者她们是否执行更危险的任务。方法:将两家不同医院工作人员感染动态的现有两项研究数据合并,不考虑职业,并分析男性和女性在感染风险方面可能存在的差异。本次要数据分析使用了原始数据。计算95%置信区间的优势比和卡方检验(95% -CI)进行相关性分析。结果:1785名员工的数据可用于评估。女性占研究参与者的74.6%。在受感染的参与者中,妇女的比例为81.7%(169人中有138人)。7.4%的男性和10.1%的女性被感染。暴露男性的感染率略低于暴露女性(9.8%和13.0%,比值比分别为3.2 [95% -CI 1.2-8.5]和3.6 [95% -CI 2.2-6.0])。对于未暴露的工人,男女感染率几乎没有差别(3.3%和4.0%)。男性和女性在私人接触后的感染率差异很小(分别为16.2%和11.2%)。结论:我们没有发现任何证据表明在医院中暴露水平相似的女性感染风险比男性增加。关键词:医护人员-性别-感染风险- COVID-19
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
Person-Job-Fit – Diagnostik und Interventionen mit dem Mini-ICF-APP-Fähigkeitskonzept bei Passungsproblemen am Arbeitsplatz Mobile Wissensarbeit in öffentlichen Fernzügen – Höhere mentale Beanspruchung als im Einzelbüro bei der mobilen Bearbeitung von Routineaufgaben Sitzmonitoring für Bewegung bei Büroarbeit Sichere und gesunde Arbeit in Zeiten des Klimawandels Technische Regel für Gefahrstoffe TRGS 401
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1