Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases

H. Abudeeb, A. Ugwu, L. Campbell, A. Mukherjee
{"title":"Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases","authors":"H. Abudeeb, A. Ugwu, L. Campbell, A. Mukherjee","doi":"10.11648/J.JS.20180606.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rectal cancer treatment outcome has improved considerably in the TME era often with the use neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, the risk of local recurrence/distant metastases could be as high as 10%. We have designed a retrospective cohort study to assess risk factors associated with local recurrence/distant metastasis after primary curative rectal resection. Our analysis of the colorectal database in a district general hospital involved review of 131 patients who had a curative resection between 2007 and 2013. 22 patients of the 131 had local recurrence/distant metastases. We reviewed the risk factors as gender, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, type of operation, anastomotic leak, tumour differentiation, EMVI, CRM and Dukes C and performed a quantitative assessment. Looking at risk factors, the presence of EMVI was found to have a statistically significant association with recurrence and distant metastases (p=0.0006) followed by poor differentiation (p= 0.038) and Dukes C (p=0.045) while CRM involvement (p=0.054), Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p=0.657), type of resection (p=0.740), Anastomotic leak (p=0.761) and gender (p=0.901) shown no obvious statistical association with recurrence or distant metastases A larger multi-centre study may help in validating our observation.","PeriodicalId":101237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JS.20180606.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rectal cancer treatment outcome has improved considerably in the TME era often with the use neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, the risk of local recurrence/distant metastases could be as high as 10%. We have designed a retrospective cohort study to assess risk factors associated with local recurrence/distant metastasis after primary curative rectal resection. Our analysis of the colorectal database in a district general hospital involved review of 131 patients who had a curative resection between 2007 and 2013. 22 patients of the 131 had local recurrence/distant metastases. We reviewed the risk factors as gender, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, type of operation, anastomotic leak, tumour differentiation, EMVI, CRM and Dukes C and performed a quantitative assessment. Looking at risk factors, the presence of EMVI was found to have a statistically significant association with recurrence and distant metastases (p=0.0006) followed by poor differentiation (p= 0.038) and Dukes C (p=0.045) while CRM involvement (p=0.054), Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p=0.657), type of resection (p=0.740), Anastomotic leak (p=0.761) and gender (p=0.901) shown no obvious statistical association with recurrence or distant metastases A larger multi-centre study may help in validating our observation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠癌局部复发和远处转移预后指标的定量评估
在TME时代,直肠癌的治疗效果有了很大的改善,通常采用新辅助放化疗。然而,局部复发/远处转移的风险可高达10%。我们设计了一项回顾性队列研究来评估原发性治愈性直肠切除术后局部复发/远处转移的相关危险因素。我们对一家地区综合医院的结直肠数据库进行了分析,回顾了2007年至2013年期间进行根治性切除的131例患者。131例中有22例局部复发/远处转移。我们回顾了性别、新辅助放化疗、手术类型、吻合口漏、肿瘤分化、EMVI、CRM和Dukes C等危险因素,并进行了定量评估。观察危险因素,EMVI的存在与复发和远处转移(p=0.0006)具有统计学意义,其次是分化不良(p= 0.038)和Dukes C (p=0.045),而CRM参与(p=0.054),新辅助放化疗(p=0.657),切除类型(p=0.740),吻合口漏(p=0.761)和性别(p=0.901)与复发或远处转移无明显统计学关联。一项更大规模的多中心研究可能有助于验证我们的观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of Mesenteric Ischemia After COVID-19 Vaccination Short Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Super Obese Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial The Intraoperative Finding of a Large Atrial Septum Defect Pre-Liver Transplantation: A Case Report Study on Preventive Intervention of Peri-knee Ecchymosis After Total Knee Replacement Late Primary B Cell Cerebral Lymphoma After Kidney Transplant: A Case Report and Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1