Evaluation of Perfusion Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Requirement in Patients with Severe Sepsis

I. Rasmy, H. Mohamed, N. Nabil, S. Abdalah, A. Hasanin, A. Eladawy, M. Ahmed, A. Mukhtar
{"title":"Evaluation of Perfusion Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Requirement in Patients with Severe Sepsis","authors":"I. Rasmy, H. Mohamed, N. Nabil, S. Abdalah, A. Hasanin, A. Eladawy, M. Ahmed, A. Mukhtar","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000000481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We evaluated the ability of perfusion index (PI) to predict vasopressor requirement during early resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis. All consecutive patients with clinically suspected severe sepsis as defined by the criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference were included. Perfusion variables included PI, arterial lactate level, central venous oxygen saturation, and the difference between central venous carbon dioxide and arterial carbon dioxide pressures, and were recorded before resuscitation and 6 h thereafter. We enrolled 36 patients with severe sepsis. Twenty-one patients required vasopressors, whereas 15 did not. The cut-off of the PI value for predicting vasopressor requirement was ⩽0.3. This cut-off value had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93%; the area under the curve was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.8–0.99, P < 0.0001). The cut-off of the arterial lactate level for predicting vasopressor requirement was ≥1.8 mg dL−1. This cut-off value had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 80%; the area under the curve was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.68–0.94, P < 0.0001). Other perfusion variables failed to predict vasopressor requirement in patients with severe sepsis. We concluded that PI and arterial lactate level are good predictors of vasopressor requirement during early resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether monitoring PI during resuscitation improves the outcome of patients with septic shock.","PeriodicalId":21787,"journal":{"name":"Shock: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches","volume":"2011 1","pages":"554–559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

ABSTRACT We evaluated the ability of perfusion index (PI) to predict vasopressor requirement during early resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis. All consecutive patients with clinically suspected severe sepsis as defined by the criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference were included. Perfusion variables included PI, arterial lactate level, central venous oxygen saturation, and the difference between central venous carbon dioxide and arterial carbon dioxide pressures, and were recorded before resuscitation and 6 h thereafter. We enrolled 36 patients with severe sepsis. Twenty-one patients required vasopressors, whereas 15 did not. The cut-off of the PI value for predicting vasopressor requirement was ⩽0.3. This cut-off value had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93%; the area under the curve was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.8–0.99, P < 0.0001). The cut-off of the arterial lactate level for predicting vasopressor requirement was ≥1.8 mg dL−1. This cut-off value had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 80%; the area under the curve was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.68–0.94, P < 0.0001). Other perfusion variables failed to predict vasopressor requirement in patients with severe sepsis. We concluded that PI and arterial lactate level are good predictors of vasopressor requirement during early resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether monitoring PI during resuscitation improves the outcome of patients with septic shock.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估灌注指数作为严重脓毒症患者血管加压素需求的预测因子
我们评估了灌注指数(PI)在严重脓毒症患者早期复苏期间预测血管加压素需求的能力。所有临床疑似严重脓毒症的连续患者均纳入美国胸科医师学会/重症医学会共识会议标准。灌注变量包括PI、动脉乳酸水平、中心静脉血氧饱和度、中心静脉二氧化碳与动脉二氧化碳压差,分别记录复苏前和复苏后6 h。我们招募了36例严重脓毒症患者。21例患者需要血管加压剂,15例不需要。预测血管加压素需要量的PI值临界值为≤0.3。该临界值的敏感性为100%,特异性为93%;曲线下面积为0.96(95%置信区间为0.8 ~ 0.99,P < 0.0001)。预测血管加压素需要量的动脉乳酸水平临界值≥1.8 mg dL−1。该临界值的敏感性为82%,特异性为80%;曲线下面积为0.84(95%可信区间0.68 ~ 0.94,P < 0.0001)。其他灌注变量不能预测严重脓毒症患者的血管加压素需求。我们得出结论,PI和动脉乳酸水平是严重脓毒症患者早期复苏时血管加压素需求的良好预测指标。需要进一步研究在复苏过程中监测PI是否能改善脓毒性休克患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metabolomic Analyses of Brain Tissue in Sepsis Induced by Cecal Ligation Reveal Specific Redox Alterations—Protective Effects of the Oxygen Radical Scavenger Edaravone Soluble Heparan Sulfate in Serum of Septic Shock Patients Induces Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Murine Cardiomyocytes Effects of the 34C>T Variant of the AMPD1 Gene on Immune Function, Multi-Organ Dysfunction, and Mortality in Sepsis Patients Evaluation of Perfusion Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Requirement in Patients with Severe Sepsis Predictors of the Onset of Hemodynamic Decompensation During Progressive Central Hypovolemia: Comparison of the Peripheral Perfusion Index, Pulse Pressure Variability, and Compensatory Reserve Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1