The Importance of Integrating Subsurface Disciplines with Machine Learning when Predicting and Optimizing Well Performance – Case Study from the Spirit River Formation
J. Hirschmiller, A. Biryukov, B. Groulx, Brian Emmerson, Scott Quinell
{"title":"The Importance of Integrating Subsurface Disciplines with Machine Learning when Predicting and Optimizing Well Performance – Case Study from the Spirit River Formation","authors":"J. Hirschmiller, A. Biryukov, B. Groulx, Brian Emmerson, Scott Quinell","doi":"10.2118/196089-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This machine learning study incorporates geoscience and engineering data to characterize which geological, reservoir and completion data contribute most significantly to well production performance. A better understanding of the key factors that predict well performance is essential in assessing the commercial viability of exploration and development, in the optimization of capital spending to increase rates of return, and in reserve and resource evaluations.\n Machine learning models provide an objective, analytical means to interpret large, complex datasets. Generally, such models demand large databases of consistently evaluated data. As geological data is interpretive, often varying from one geologist to another, or from one pool to another, it can be difficult to incorporate geological data into regional machine learning models. Consequently, efforts to use machine learning in the oil and gas industry to predict well performance are often focused exclusively on engineering completion technology. However, this case study has utilized a regional geological Spirit River database with consistent petrophysical evaluation methodology across the entire play. This geological database is complemented with public completion and fracture data and production data to build predictive models using inputs from all subsurface disciplines.\n Redundancies in the data were identified and removed. Features explaining a significant proportion of the variance in production were also removed if their effect was captured by more fundamental, correlated features that were more straightforward to interpret. The dataset was distilled to 13 key features providing predictions with a similar precision to those obtained using the full-featured dataset.\n The thirteen features in this case study are a combination of geological, reservoir and completion data, underlining that an approach integrating both geoscience and engineering data is vital to predicting and optimizing well performance accurately for future wells.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196089-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This machine learning study incorporates geoscience and engineering data to characterize which geological, reservoir and completion data contribute most significantly to well production performance. A better understanding of the key factors that predict well performance is essential in assessing the commercial viability of exploration and development, in the optimization of capital spending to increase rates of return, and in reserve and resource evaluations.
Machine learning models provide an objective, analytical means to interpret large, complex datasets. Generally, such models demand large databases of consistently evaluated data. As geological data is interpretive, often varying from one geologist to another, or from one pool to another, it can be difficult to incorporate geological data into regional machine learning models. Consequently, efforts to use machine learning in the oil and gas industry to predict well performance are often focused exclusively on engineering completion technology. However, this case study has utilized a regional geological Spirit River database with consistent petrophysical evaluation methodology across the entire play. This geological database is complemented with public completion and fracture data and production data to build predictive models using inputs from all subsurface disciplines.
Redundancies in the data were identified and removed. Features explaining a significant proportion of the variance in production were also removed if their effect was captured by more fundamental, correlated features that were more straightforward to interpret. The dataset was distilled to 13 key features providing predictions with a similar precision to those obtained using the full-featured dataset.
The thirteen features in this case study are a combination of geological, reservoir and completion data, underlining that an approach integrating both geoscience and engineering data is vital to predicting and optimizing well performance accurately for future wells.