J. White, William H. Stiver, M. Steinberg, J. Cissell
{"title":"Comparing management techniques used on conflict American black bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park","authors":"J. White, William H. Stiver, M. Steinberg, J. Cissell","doi":"10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00008.R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM or Park), American black bears (Ursus americanus) sometimes exhibit conflict behavior that requires resource managers to act. Management options for conflict bears are limited, and it is necessary to evaluate their effectiveness. We analyzed 26 years (1990–2015) of bear capture data and calculated and compared the success rates of the 2 main techniques used to manage bears exhibiting conflict behavior in GRSM: capture and relocation, and capture and on-site release. Overall success rates, defined as a captured bear that was not recaptured for later conflict behavior, for all conflict bears captured was 74%. Bears that were relocated after their first capture were more successful (87%) than those that were released on-site following their first capture (61%), and median time before recapture was greater for relocated bears (293 days) than those released on-site (65 days).","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":"73 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00008.R","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: In Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM or Park), American black bears (Ursus americanus) sometimes exhibit conflict behavior that requires resource managers to act. Management options for conflict bears are limited, and it is necessary to evaluate their effectiveness. We analyzed 26 years (1990–2015) of bear capture data and calculated and compared the success rates of the 2 main techniques used to manage bears exhibiting conflict behavior in GRSM: capture and relocation, and capture and on-site release. Overall success rates, defined as a captured bear that was not recaptured for later conflict behavior, for all conflict bears captured was 74%. Bears that were relocated after their first capture were more successful (87%) than those that were released on-site following their first capture (61%), and median time before recapture was greater for relocated bears (293 days) than those released on-site (65 days).
期刊介绍:
Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.