Precipitation Ansatz dependent Future Sea Level Contribution by Antarctica based on CMIP5 Model Forcing

C. Rodehacke, M. Pfeiffer, T. Semmler, Özgür Gurses, T. Kleiner
{"title":"Precipitation Ansatz dependent Future Sea Level Contribution by Antarctica based on CMIP5 Model Forcing","authors":"C. Rodehacke, M. Pfeiffer, T. Semmler, Özgür Gurses, T. Kleiner","doi":"10.5194/esd-2019-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Various observational estimates indicate growing mass loss at Antarctica's margins but also heavier precipitation across the continent. In the future, heavier precipitation fallen on Antarctica will counteract any stronger iceberg discharge and increased basal melting of floating ice shelves driven by a warming ocean. Here, we use from nine CMIP5 models future projections, ranging from strong mitigation efforts to business-as-usual, to run an ensemble of ice-sheet simulations. We test, how the precipitation boundary condition determines Antarctica's sea-level contribution. The spatial and temporal varying climate forcings drive ice-sheet simulations. Hence, our ensemble inherits all spatial and temporal climate patterns, which is in contrast to a spatial mean forcing. Regardless of the applied boundary condition and forcing, some areas will lose ice in the future, such as the glaciers from the West Antarctic Ice Sheet draining into the Amundsen Sea. In general the simulated ice-sheet thickness grows in a broad marginal strip, where incoming storms deliver topographically controlled precipitation. This strip shows the largest ice thickness differences between the applied precipitation boundary conditions too. On average Antarctica's ice mass shrinks for all future scenarios if the precipitation is scaled by the spatial temperature anomalies coming from the CMIP5 models. In this approach, we use the relative precipitation increment per degree warming as invariant scaling constant. In contrast, Antarctica gains mass in our simulations if we apply the simulated precipitation anomalies of the CMIP5 models directly. Here, the scaling factors show a distinct spatial pattern across Antarctica. Furthermore, the diagnosed mean scaling across all considered climate forcings is larger than the values deduced from ice cores. In general, the scaling is higher across the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, lower across the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, and lowest around the Siple Coast. The latter is located on the east side of the Ross Ice Shelf.","PeriodicalId":11466,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Various observational estimates indicate growing mass loss at Antarctica's margins but also heavier precipitation across the continent. In the future, heavier precipitation fallen on Antarctica will counteract any stronger iceberg discharge and increased basal melting of floating ice shelves driven by a warming ocean. Here, we use from nine CMIP5 models future projections, ranging from strong mitigation efforts to business-as-usual, to run an ensemble of ice-sheet simulations. We test, how the precipitation boundary condition determines Antarctica's sea-level contribution. The spatial and temporal varying climate forcings drive ice-sheet simulations. Hence, our ensemble inherits all spatial and temporal climate patterns, which is in contrast to a spatial mean forcing. Regardless of the applied boundary condition and forcing, some areas will lose ice in the future, such as the glaciers from the West Antarctic Ice Sheet draining into the Amundsen Sea. In general the simulated ice-sheet thickness grows in a broad marginal strip, where incoming storms deliver topographically controlled precipitation. This strip shows the largest ice thickness differences between the applied precipitation boundary conditions too. On average Antarctica's ice mass shrinks for all future scenarios if the precipitation is scaled by the spatial temperature anomalies coming from the CMIP5 models. In this approach, we use the relative precipitation increment per degree warming as invariant scaling constant. In contrast, Antarctica gains mass in our simulations if we apply the simulated precipitation anomalies of the CMIP5 models directly. Here, the scaling factors show a distinct spatial pattern across Antarctica. Furthermore, the diagnosed mean scaling across all considered climate forcings is larger than the values deduced from ice cores. In general, the scaling is higher across the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, lower across the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, and lowest around the Siple Coast. The latter is located on the east side of the Ross Ice Shelf.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于CMIP5模式强迫的南极洲对未来海平面的贡献与降水Ansatz相关
摘要各种观测估计表明,南极洲边缘的质量损失在增加,但整个大陆的降水也在增加。未来,在南极洲降下的更强降水将抵消任何更强的冰山排放和由海洋变暖驱动的浮冰架基底融化的增加。在这里,我们使用了9个CMIP5模型对未来的预测,从强有力的缓解努力到一切照旧,来运行一系列冰盖模拟。我们测试了降水边界条件如何决定南极洲海平面的贡献。时空变化的气候强迫驱动冰盖模拟。因此,我们的总体继承了所有空间和时间气候模式,这与空间平均强迫相反。无论应用的边界条件和强迫如何,一些地区在未来将失去冰,例如南极西部冰盖的冰川流入阿蒙森海。一般来说,模拟的冰盖厚度在一个宽阔的边缘地带增长,在那里,来袭的风暴带来地形控制的降水。这条图也显示了不同降水边界条件下最大的冰厚差异。如果用CMIP5模式的空间温度异常来衡量降水,那么在所有未来情景下,南极洲的冰质量平均都会缩小。在这种方法中,我们使用每升温一度的相对降水增量作为不变标度常数。相反,如果我们直接应用CMIP5模式模拟的降水异常,则南极洲在我们的模拟中增加了质量。在这里,比例因子显示出整个南极洲的独特空间格局。此外,所有考虑的气候强迫的诊断平均尺度大于从冰芯推断的值。总的来说,南极东部冰盖的尺度较高,南极西部冰盖的尺度较低,而简单海岸周围的尺度最低。后者位于罗斯冰架的东侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESD Ideas: Arctic amplification's contribution to breaches of the Paris Agreement Derailment risk: A systems analysis that identifies risks which could derail the sustainability transition Nonlinear time series analysis of coastal temperatures and El Niño–Southern Oscillation events in the eastern South Pacific MIROC6 Large Ensemble (MIROC6-LE): experimental design and initial analyses A quantitative assessment of air–sea heat flux trends from ERA5 since 1950 in the North Atlantic basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1