Evaluating the likelihood of slope failure in ageing earthworks using Bayesian updating

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Infrastructure Asset Management Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1680/jinam.23.00005
Yuderka Trinidad González, K. Briggs, A. Svalova, S. Glendinning
{"title":"Evaluating the likelihood of slope failure in ageing earthworks using Bayesian updating","authors":"Yuderka Trinidad González, K. Briggs, A. Svalova, S. Glendinning","doi":"10.1680/jinam.23.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earthwork assets, including cut slopes and embankments, are essential components of the infrastructure supporting road and rail transportation networks. Asset owners must assess the stability of these slopes as they deteriorate, to prevent unwanted slope failures. Assessing the stability of individual earthworks within a portfolio using slope stability analyses can be expensive and time-consuming. Hence, a Bayesian logistic regression model was developed to evaluate the probability of slope failure, using training data from published case histories of slope failures. The Bayesian model was then used to assess the probability of failure for the more specific case of clay cut slopes within a railway earthwork asset portfolio owned by Network Rail (NR). The portfolio includes earthworks at various stages of degraded strength and with different drainage conditions. The results from models with material properties that were equivalent to those for the deteriorated strength of clays compared most closely with clay cut slope failures within the NR dataset. Steeper slopes (>35 degrees) had the highest probability of failure, regardless of the drainage condition. However, for shallower slopes, the poorly-drained slopes had a ≈20% higher probability of failure than the well-drained slopes.","PeriodicalId":43387,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructure Asset Management","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructure Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.23.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Earthwork assets, including cut slopes and embankments, are essential components of the infrastructure supporting road and rail transportation networks. Asset owners must assess the stability of these slopes as they deteriorate, to prevent unwanted slope failures. Assessing the stability of individual earthworks within a portfolio using slope stability analyses can be expensive and time-consuming. Hence, a Bayesian logistic regression model was developed to evaluate the probability of slope failure, using training data from published case histories of slope failures. The Bayesian model was then used to assess the probability of failure for the more specific case of clay cut slopes within a railway earthwork asset portfolio owned by Network Rail (NR). The portfolio includes earthworks at various stages of degraded strength and with different drainage conditions. The results from models with material properties that were equivalent to those for the deteriorated strength of clays compared most closely with clay cut slope failures within the NR dataset. Steeper slopes (>35 degrees) had the highest probability of failure, regardless of the drainage condition. However, for shallower slopes, the poorly-drained slopes had a ≈20% higher probability of failure than the well-drained slopes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用贝叶斯更新法评估老化土方工程边坡破坏的可能性
土方工程资产,包括路堑边坡和路堤,是支持公路和铁路运输网络的基础设施的重要组成部分。资产所有者必须在这些斜坡恶化时评估其稳定性,以防止不必要的斜坡破坏。使用边坡稳定性分析来评估组合中单个土方工程的稳定性既昂贵又耗时。因此,我们开发了一个贝叶斯逻辑回归模型来评估边坡破坏的概率,使用来自已发表的边坡破坏案例历史的训练数据。然后,贝叶斯模型用于评估网络铁路(NR)拥有的铁路土方工程资产组合中粘土切割边坡的更具体情况的失效概率。该组合包括不同强度退化阶段和不同排水条件下的土方工程。与NR数据集中的粘土切割边坡破坏相比,材料特性与粘土强度恶化的模型结果最为接近。无论排水条件如何,坡度较大(>35度)的破坏概率最高。然而,对于较浅的边坡,排水不良的边坡的破坏概率比排水良好的边坡高约20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Exploration of the impact of junction characteristics on pedestrian red light violation Viability rubric of FRP composites for civil infrastructure applications Automated early estimation of bridge interventions, possession windows and costs Multi-objective optimization of building planning energy saving based on genetic algorithm Evaluating the impact of flexible offices in coping with the uncertainty on future demand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1