Optimizing Laser Atherectomy for Different Lesion Morphologies

George L. Adams, V. Subramanian
{"title":"Optimizing Laser Atherectomy for Different Lesion Morphologies","authors":"George L. Adams, V. Subramanian","doi":"10.25270/jcli/clig21-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To understand the impact of fluence and repetition rate on outcomes of superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal artery laser atherectomy based on lesion type (calcific, homogenous, heterogeneous, and restenosis). Methods. Patients with de novo or restenotic (≥50%) SFA and popliteal artery atherosclerotic disease were enrolled. All lesions were sequentially treated with Turbo-Power laser atherectomy (Spectranetics) at 3 predetermined intensity settings: low (fluency, 40 mJ/mm2; repetition rate, 60 Hz); medium (fluency, 60 mJ/mm2; repetition rate, 40 Hz); and high (fluency, 60 mJ/mm2; repetition rate, 60 Hz). Angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed to characterize plaque morphology and evaluate residual stenosis. Follow-up was 30 days and medical records were reviewed through 12 months for adverse events. Results. Forty-five patients with 57 lesions (12 homogenous, 15 heterogeneous, 15 calcific, and 15 restenotic) were enrolled. Rutherford classification ranged from 2-5, average lesion length was 98.2 ± 91.2 mm, and average diameter stenosis was 82.5 ± 17.9%. Compared with baseline, all lesion types had significant improvement in final postprocedure (atherectomy + any adjunctive therapies) diameter stenosis. Prior to adjunctive therapy, the heterogeneous and restenosis groups saw improvement in minimum lumen area following each stage of the laser treatment. However, the calcific and homogenous groups saw little change in minimum lumen area between the medium- and high-intensity laser treatments. Within 6 months, a total of 6 patients had target-lesion revascularizations. No major amputations or deaths occurred through follow-up. Conclusion. Laser intensity settings during atherectomy should be selected based on lesion morphology. IVUS was essential in defining plaque morphology.","PeriodicalId":73697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcli/clig21-00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To understand the impact of fluence and repetition rate on outcomes of superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal artery laser atherectomy based on lesion type (calcific, homogenous, heterogeneous, and restenosis). Methods. Patients with de novo or restenotic (≥50%) SFA and popliteal artery atherosclerotic disease were enrolled. All lesions were sequentially treated with Turbo-Power laser atherectomy (Spectranetics) at 3 predetermined intensity settings: low (fluency, 40 mJ/mm2; repetition rate, 60 Hz); medium (fluency, 60 mJ/mm2; repetition rate, 40 Hz); and high (fluency, 60 mJ/mm2; repetition rate, 60 Hz). Angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed to characterize plaque morphology and evaluate residual stenosis. Follow-up was 30 days and medical records were reviewed through 12 months for adverse events. Results. Forty-five patients with 57 lesions (12 homogenous, 15 heterogeneous, 15 calcific, and 15 restenotic) were enrolled. Rutherford classification ranged from 2-5, average lesion length was 98.2 ± 91.2 mm, and average diameter stenosis was 82.5 ± 17.9%. Compared with baseline, all lesion types had significant improvement in final postprocedure (atherectomy + any adjunctive therapies) diameter stenosis. Prior to adjunctive therapy, the heterogeneous and restenosis groups saw improvement in minimum lumen area following each stage of the laser treatment. However, the calcific and homogenous groups saw little change in minimum lumen area between the medium- and high-intensity laser treatments. Within 6 months, a total of 6 patients had target-lesion revascularizations. No major amputations or deaths occurred through follow-up. Conclusion. Laser intensity settings during atherectomy should be selected based on lesion morphology. IVUS was essential in defining plaque morphology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同病变形态的激光动脉粥样硬化切除术优化
目标。了解影响和重复率对基于病变类型(钙化、均匀、非均匀和再狭窄)的股浅动脉(SFA)和腘动脉激光动脉粥样硬化切除术结果的影响。方法。纳入了新发或再狭窄(≥50%)SFA和腘动脉粥样硬化性疾病的患者。所有病变依次接受涡轮功率激光动脉粥样硬化切除术(光谱)在3个预定的强度设置:低(流畅,40 mJ/mm2;重复频率,60 Hz);中等(流畅度,60 mJ/mm2;重复频率,40 Hz);高流畅度,60 mJ/mm2;重复频率,60赫兹)。血管造影和血管内超声(IVUS)表征斑块形态和评估残余狭窄。随访30天,回顾12个月的不良事件医疗记录。结果。45例患者共57个病变(12例均质性,15例异质性,15例钙化,15例再狭窄)。Rutherford分型范围为2-5,平均病变长度为98.2±91.2 mm,平均狭窄直径为82.5±17.9%。与基线相比,所有病变类型的最终术后(动脉粥样硬化切除术+任何辅助治疗)内径狭窄均有显著改善。在辅助治疗之前,异质性和再狭窄组在激光治疗的每个阶段后最小管腔面积都有所改善。然而,钙化组和同质组在中强度和高强度激光治疗之间的最小管腔面积几乎没有变化。6个月内,共有6例患者发生了靶病变血运重建术。随访期间未发生重大截肢或死亡。结论。在动脉粥样硬化切除术中激光强度的设置应根据病变形态来选择。IVUS对确定斑块形态至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy in Patients with Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes. Single-Center Experience With Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Directional Atherectomy System for Below-the-Knee Critical Limb Ischemia Optimizing Laser Atherectomy for Different Lesion Morphologies Use of the Ranger Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Short-Term Safety and Efficacy Results From Singapore Acute Occlusion of 14 Fr Femoral Access Site After Suture/Collagen Device Failure and Successful Transradial Recanalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1