Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy in Patients with Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes.

Journal of critical limb ischemia Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Momodou L Jammeh, Julia Suggs, George L Adams, Ehrin J Armstrong, Jihad Mustapha, Mohamed A Zayed
{"title":"Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy in Patients with Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes.","authors":"Momodou L Jammeh,&nbsp;Julia Suggs,&nbsp;George L Adams,&nbsp;Ehrin J Armstrong,&nbsp;Jihad Mustapha,&nbsp;Mohamed A Zayed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with diabetes and critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) are at significantly higher risk of limb loss and death. Here we evaluate the outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of CLTI in patients with and without diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of the LIBERTY 360 study was performed to evaluate baseline demographics, and peri-procedural outcomes between patients with CLTI, and with and without diabetes. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox regression to examine the impact of OA in patients with diabetes and CLTI over a 3-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 289 patients (201 with diabetes, 88 without diabetes) with Rutherford classification 4-6 were included. Patients with diabetes had higher proportion of renal disease (48.3% vs 28.4%, p=0.002), prior minor/major limb amputation (26% vs 8%, p<0.005), and presence of wounds (63.2% vs 48.9%, p=0.027). Operative times, radiation dosage, and contrast volume were similar between groups. The rate of distal embolization was higher in patients with diabetes (7.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.01; OR 4.33 [0.99, 18.88], p=0.05). However, at 3-years post-procedure, patients with diabetes had no differences in freedom from target vessel/lesion revascularization (HR 1.09, p=0.73), major adverse events (MAE; HR 1.25, p=0.36), major target limb amputation (HR 1.74, p=0.39), and death (HR 1.11, p=0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LIBERTY 360 observed high limb preservation and low MAEs in patients with diabetes and CLTI. Higher distal embolization was observed with OA in patients with diabetes, but OR did not indicate a significant difference in risk between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","volume":"2 2","pages":"E29-E37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10103796/pdf/nihms-1888830.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with diabetes and critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) are at significantly higher risk of limb loss and death. Here we evaluate the outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of CLTI in patients with and without diabetes.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of the LIBERTY 360 study was performed to evaluate baseline demographics, and peri-procedural outcomes between patients with CLTI, and with and without diabetes. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox regression to examine the impact of OA in patients with diabetes and CLTI over a 3-year follow-up.

Results: A total of 289 patients (201 with diabetes, 88 without diabetes) with Rutherford classification 4-6 were included. Patients with diabetes had higher proportion of renal disease (48.3% vs 28.4%, p=0.002), prior minor/major limb amputation (26% vs 8%, p<0.005), and presence of wounds (63.2% vs 48.9%, p=0.027). Operative times, radiation dosage, and contrast volume were similar between groups. The rate of distal embolization was higher in patients with diabetes (7.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.01; OR 4.33 [0.99, 18.88], p=0.05). However, at 3-years post-procedure, patients with diabetes had no differences in freedom from target vessel/lesion revascularization (HR 1.09, p=0.73), major adverse events (MAE; HR 1.25, p=0.36), major target limb amputation (HR 1.74, p=0.39), and death (HR 1.11, p=0.72).

Conclusion: The LIBERTY 360 observed high limb preservation and low MAEs in patients with diabetes and CLTI. Higher distal embolization was observed with OA in patients with diabetes, but OR did not indicate a significant difference in risk between groups.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眶动脉粥样硬化切除术治疗严重肢体缺血和糖尿病患者的疗效。
目的:糖尿病合并严重肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)患者肢体丧失和死亡的风险显著增高。在这里,我们评估了眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术(OA)治疗伴有和不伴有糖尿病的CLTI患者的结果。方法:对LIBERTY 360研究进行回顾性分析,以评估CLTI患者、合并和不合并糖尿病患者之间的基线人口统计学和围手术期结局。在3年的随访中,采用Cox回归法确定OA对糖尿病和CLTI患者的影响。结果:共纳入Rutherford分类4-6的289例患者(糖尿病201例,非糖尿病88例)。糖尿病患者有较高比例的肾脏疾病(48.3% vs 28.4%, p=0.002),既往的小/大截肢(26% vs 8%)。结论:LIBERTY 360观察到糖尿病和CLTI患者的肢体保留率高,MAEs低。糖尿病OA患者远端栓塞率较高,但OR未显示组间风险有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy in Patients with Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes. Single-Center Experience With Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Directional Atherectomy System for Below-the-Knee Critical Limb Ischemia Optimizing Laser Atherectomy for Different Lesion Morphologies Use of the Ranger Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Short-Term Safety and Efficacy Results From Singapore Acute Occlusion of 14 Fr Femoral Access Site After Suture/Collagen Device Failure and Successful Transradial Recanalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1