Crise iemenita: da atuação de mercenários contratados à jurisdição do tribunal penal internacional frente às violações de direito humanitário

Tatiana Cardoso Squeff, Beatriz Patriota
{"title":"Crise iemenita: da atuação de mercenários contratados à jurisdição do tribunal penal internacional frente às violações de direito humanitário","authors":"Tatiana Cardoso Squeff, Beatriz Patriota","doi":"10.14295/CN.V2I3.12317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The War in Yemen completes, in 2020, six years of duration, being routinely rated as the worst existing humanitarian crisis, given that the number of fatalities has already exceeded 100,000 dead. Despite being an internal conflict, hostilities involve numerous fronts, both state and nonstate, what makes it difficult to resolve. One aspect, however, that makes the conflict even more peculiar is the use of mercenaries, that is, private combatants who are identified as the cause of several atrocities classified as war crimes and crimes against humanity by the international society. In light of this scenario, a recurring question has been the possibility of bringing these situations to the attention of the International Criminal Court (ICC), so that it can judge these actors by their conduct, being this the central object of analysis of the article, which is carried out through the hypothetical-deductive method and from a descriptive-explanatory view. Therefore, parting from a bibliographic and documentary analysis, after verifying the details of the Yemeni conflict and studying the performance of the parties involved, we examine the performance of the ICC, concluding that only mercenaries from State-parties to the Rome Statute could be tried by it, despite the prosecution of the Court having rejected, in 2019, the complaints intended to try those involved in the conflict.","PeriodicalId":100317,"journal":{"name":"Computer Networks and ISDN Systems","volume":"4 1","pages":"46-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Networks and ISDN Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14295/CN.V2I3.12317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The War in Yemen completes, in 2020, six years of duration, being routinely rated as the worst existing humanitarian crisis, given that the number of fatalities has already exceeded 100,000 dead. Despite being an internal conflict, hostilities involve numerous fronts, both state and nonstate, what makes it difficult to resolve. One aspect, however, that makes the conflict even more peculiar is the use of mercenaries, that is, private combatants who are identified as the cause of several atrocities classified as war crimes and crimes against humanity by the international society. In light of this scenario, a recurring question has been the possibility of bringing these situations to the attention of the International Criminal Court (ICC), so that it can judge these actors by their conduct, being this the central object of analysis of the article, which is carried out through the hypothetical-deductive method and from a descriptive-explanatory view. Therefore, parting from a bibliographic and documentary analysis, after verifying the details of the Yemeni conflict and studying the performance of the parties involved, we examine the performance of the ICC, concluding that only mercenaries from State-parties to the Rome Statute could be tried by it, despite the prosecution of the Court having rejected, in 2019, the complaints intended to try those involved in the conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
也门危机:从雇佣雇佣军的行动到国际刑事法院对违反人道主义法行为的管辖权
鉴于死亡人数已超过10万人,也门战争将在2020年结束六年的持续时间,并经常被评为现有最严重的人道主义危机。尽管是内部冲突,但敌对行动涉及许多战线,包括国家和非国家,这使得解决困难。然而,使冲突更加特殊的一个方面是使用雇佣军,即私人战斗人员,他们被国际社会认定为战争罪和危害人类罪的若干暴行的起因。鉴于这种情况,一个反复出现的问题是,是否有可能提请国际刑事法院注意这些情况,以便它能够根据这些行为者的行为来判断他们,因为这是对该条进行分析的中心对象,分析是通过假设-演绎方法和从描述-解释的观点进行的。因此,在文献和文献分析的基础上,在核实了也门冲突的细节并研究了有关各方的表现之后,我们研究了国际刑事法院的表现,得出结论认为,尽管国际刑事法院在2019年驳回了旨在审判冲突参与者的起诉,但只有来自《罗马规约》缔约国的雇佣军才能受到国际刑事法院的审判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploración sísmica de refracción mediante ruido sísmico La lógica de la gestión del riesgo volcánico Aplicación de VolcFlow para simular Avalanchas de Escombros y CDP en los volcanes Popocatépetl, Volcán de Colima y Ceboruco Transformadores de Potencia con Doble Núcleo: Análisis de respuesta a la frecuencia Caracterización de un holograma mediante el dopaje de un PDLC con violeta de genciana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1