Therapeutic Potential of Transcendental Inquiry in the Husserlian Philosophy

W. Płotka
{"title":"Therapeutic Potential of Transcendental Inquiry in the Husserlian Philosophy","authors":"W. Płotka","doi":"10.3846/COACTIVITY.2010.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of the article is to reconstruct a therapeutic potential of phenomenology, in particular, within Edmund Husserl’s and Eugen Fink’s program of transcendental inquiry about time. However, the Project of objective claims of phenomenology, which is presented in the Logical Investigations seems to exclude all therapeutic approach. Rather, the program postulates the striving for abstract “truths in themselves,” also it ignores the surrounding world, as well as intersubjectivity, and finally leads to the solitary life of a phenomenologist. How then is the therapeutic potential of phenomenology possible? The case of questioning plays the crucial role in the context of objective science. According to Husserl, each science which does not allow to ask “the most burning questions” is naļve, and therefore it limits the therapeutic potential. While focusing on propositions, objective phenomenology excludes all questions, indeed. In contrast to such a view, transcendental phenomenology allows to ask over and over again, and by doing so, it introduces the world, as well as intersubjectivity as horizons of phenomenological inquiry. Concluding, Husserl’s collaboration with Fink presents such a communal effort into questioning about time. Therefore, “therapeutic potential” of phenomenology means precisely the methodological movement of the possibility for communal formulation of transcendental investigation.","PeriodicalId":53267,"journal":{"name":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","volume":"66 1","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/COACTIVITY.2010.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to reconstruct a therapeutic potential of phenomenology, in particular, within Edmund Husserl’s and Eugen Fink’s program of transcendental inquiry about time. However, the Project of objective claims of phenomenology, which is presented in the Logical Investigations seems to exclude all therapeutic approach. Rather, the program postulates the striving for abstract “truths in themselves,” also it ignores the surrounding world, as well as intersubjectivity, and finally leads to the solitary life of a phenomenologist. How then is the therapeutic potential of phenomenology possible? The case of questioning plays the crucial role in the context of objective science. According to Husserl, each science which does not allow to ask “the most burning questions” is naļve, and therefore it limits the therapeutic potential. While focusing on propositions, objective phenomenology excludes all questions, indeed. In contrast to such a view, transcendental phenomenology allows to ask over and over again, and by doing so, it introduces the world, as well as intersubjectivity as horizons of phenomenological inquiry. Concluding, Husserl’s collaboration with Fink presents such a communal effort into questioning about time. Therefore, “therapeutic potential” of phenomenology means precisely the methodological movement of the possibility for communal formulation of transcendental investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胡塞尔哲学中先验探究的治疗潜力
本文的主要目的是重建现象学的治疗潜力,特别是在埃德蒙·胡塞尔和欧根·芬克关于时间的先验探究计划中。然而,在《逻辑研究》中提出的现象学的客观主张计划似乎排除了所有治疗方法。相反,该计划假定了对抽象的“自身真理”的追求,也忽略了周围的世界,以及主体间性,最终导致了现象学家的孤独生活。那么现象学的治疗潜力是如何可能的呢?质疑的案例在客观科学的语境中起着至关重要的作用。根据胡塞尔的说法,每一门不允许提出“最紧迫的问题”的科学都是naļve,因此它限制了治疗潜力。客观现象学在关注命题的同时,确实排除了所有的问题。与这种观点相反,先验现象学允许一遍又一遍地发问,通过这样做,它将世界以及主体间性引入现象学探究的视界。综上所述,胡塞尔与芬克的合作展现了对时间质疑的共同努力。因此,现象学的“治疗潜能”恰恰意味着先验研究的共同表述可能性的方法论运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Practical and Academic Application for Knowledge of Lanquage for Specific Purposes The Development of the Standard Lithuanian Language: Ecolinguistic Approach LEXICAL FEATURES OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE Application of the Elements of Problem-Based Learning in Professional Foreign Language Studies at LUHS Analysis of Adaptation of Smartphone Operating Systems for Work in the Lithuanian Linguistic Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1