Assessment of CO2 and NOx Emissions of One Diesel and One Bi-Fuel Gasoline/CNG Euro 6 Vehicles During Real-World Driving and Laboratory Testing

IF 2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering Pub Date : 2019-12-03 DOI:10.3389/fmech.2019.00062
A. Dimaratos, Z. Toumasatos, S. Doulgeris, Georgios Triantafyllopoulos, A. Kontses, Z. Samaras
{"title":"Assessment of CO2 and NOx Emissions of One Diesel and One Bi-Fuel Gasoline/CNG Euro 6 Vehicles During Real-World Driving and Laboratory Testing","authors":"A. Dimaratos, Z. Toumasatos, S. Doulgeris, Georgios Triantafyllopoulos, A. Kontses, Z. Samaras","doi":"10.3389/fmech.2019.00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is the assessment of the real-world environmental performance, and the comparison with laboratory measurements, of two Euro 6 passenger cars. The first is equipped with a common-rail diesel engine, Lean NOx Trap (LNT) and Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF), and the second is a bi-fuel gasoline/CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) one, equipped with Three Way Catalyst (TWC). The experimental campaign consisted of on-road and chassis dynamometer measurements. In the former test set, two driving routes were followed, one complying with the Real Driving Emissions (RDE) regulation, and another characterized by more dynamic driving. The aim of the latter route was to go beyond the regulatory limits and cover a wider range of real-world conditions and engine operating area. In the laboratory, the WLTC (Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle) was tested, applying the real-world road load of the vehicles. Both cars underwent the same tests, and these were repeated for the primary (CNG) and the secondary (gasoline) fuel of the bi-fuel vehicle. In all the tests, CO2 and NOx emissions were measured with a Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS). The results were analyzed on two levels, the aggregated and the instantaneous, in order to highlight the different emissions attributes under varying driving conditions. The application of the realistic road load in the WLTC limited its difference with the RDE compliant route, in terms of CO2 emissions. However, the aggressive driver behavior and the uphill roads of the Dynamic driving schedule resulted in around double CO2 emissions for both cars. The potential of natural gas to reduce CO2 emissions was also highlighted. Concerning the diesel car NOx emissions, the real-world results were significantly higher than the respective WLTC levels. On the other hand, the bi-fuel car exhibited very low NOx emissions with both fuels. Natural gas resulted in increased NOx emissions, compared to gasoline, always remaining below the Euro 6 limit, with only exception the Dynamic driving schedule. Finally, it was found that the overall cycle dynamics are not sufficient for the complete assessment of transient emissions and the instantaneous engine and aftertreatment behavior can reveal additional details.","PeriodicalId":53220,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2019.00062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The objective of this study is the assessment of the real-world environmental performance, and the comparison with laboratory measurements, of two Euro 6 passenger cars. The first is equipped with a common-rail diesel engine, Lean NOx Trap (LNT) and Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF), and the second is a bi-fuel gasoline/CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) one, equipped with Three Way Catalyst (TWC). The experimental campaign consisted of on-road and chassis dynamometer measurements. In the former test set, two driving routes were followed, one complying with the Real Driving Emissions (RDE) regulation, and another characterized by more dynamic driving. The aim of the latter route was to go beyond the regulatory limits and cover a wider range of real-world conditions and engine operating area. In the laboratory, the WLTC (Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle) was tested, applying the real-world road load of the vehicles. Both cars underwent the same tests, and these were repeated for the primary (CNG) and the secondary (gasoline) fuel of the bi-fuel vehicle. In all the tests, CO2 and NOx emissions were measured with a Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS). The results were analyzed on two levels, the aggregated and the instantaneous, in order to highlight the different emissions attributes under varying driving conditions. The application of the realistic road load in the WLTC limited its difference with the RDE compliant route, in terms of CO2 emissions. However, the aggressive driver behavior and the uphill roads of the Dynamic driving schedule resulted in around double CO2 emissions for both cars. The potential of natural gas to reduce CO2 emissions was also highlighted. Concerning the diesel car NOx emissions, the real-world results were significantly higher than the respective WLTC levels. On the other hand, the bi-fuel car exhibited very low NOx emissions with both fuels. Natural gas resulted in increased NOx emissions, compared to gasoline, always remaining below the Euro 6 limit, with only exception the Dynamic driving schedule. Finally, it was found that the overall cycle dynamics are not sufficient for the complete assessment of transient emissions and the instantaneous engine and aftertreatment behavior can reveal additional details.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一辆柴油和一辆双燃料汽油/CNG欧六车辆在实际驾驶和实验室测试中的二氧化碳和氮氧化物排放评估
本研究的目的是评估两辆欧6轿车的真实环境表现,并与实验室测量结果进行比较。第一辆配备了共轨柴油发动机、精益氮氧化物捕集器(LNT)和柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF),第二辆是双燃料汽油/压缩天然气(CNG)发动机,配备了三元催化剂(TWC)。实验活动包括道路和底盘测功机测量。在前一个测试集中,遵循两条驾驶路线,一条符合真实驾驶排放(RDE)法规,另一条具有更动态的驾驶特征。后一条路线的目标是超越监管限制,覆盖更广泛的现实条件和发动机操作区域。在实验室中,采用WLTC(全球统一轻型车辆测试周期)进行测试,应用车辆的真实道路载荷。两辆车都进行了相同的测试,并且对双燃料汽车的主要燃料(CNG)和次要燃料(汽油)进行了重复测试。在所有测试中,使用便携式排放测量系统(PEMS)测量CO2和NOx排放量。为了突出不同驾驶条件下的不同排放属性,对结果进行了汇总和瞬时两个层面的分析。在二氧化碳排放方面,WLTC中实际道路负荷的应用限制了其与符合RDE的路线的差异。然而,激进的驾驶员行为和上坡道路的动态驾驶计划导致两辆车的二氧化碳排放量大约翻倍。会议还强调了天然气在减少二氧化碳排放方面的潜力。在柴油车氮氧化物排放方面,实际结果明显高于各自的WLTC水平。另一方面,双燃料汽车表现出非常低的氮氧化物排放,两种燃料。与汽油相比,天然气导致氮氧化物排放量增加,始终低于欧6标准,只有动态驾驶计划例外。最后,发现整体循环动力学不足以完整评估瞬态排放,发动机和后处理的瞬时行为可以揭示更多的细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Direct yaw moment control of eight-wheeled distributed drive electric vehicles based on super-twisting sliding mode control Uncertainty-aware explainable AI as a foundational paradigm for digital twins Optimization of virtual design and machining time of the mold master ceramic jewelry products with Indonesian batik motifs A temperature-based synthesis and characterization study of aluminum-incorporated diamond-like carbon thin films Parametric comparison of different lobe rotor geometry for positive displacement turbine in water distribution network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1