Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Mathematics Learning Achievement in terms of Student Adversity Quotient (AQ)

R. Lusiana, E. Suprapto, Ika Sukristini
{"title":"Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Mathematics Learning Achievement in terms of Student Adversity Quotient (AQ)","authors":"R. Lusiana, E. Suprapto, Ika Sukristini","doi":"10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.7670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovative learning models have an influence on student achievement. This study aims to determine whether the PBL learning model is more effective than the STAD learning model (learning model that has been applied in schools) on mathematics learning achievement, whether there is a difference in the effect of the AQ of climber, camper, and quitter category students on mathematics learning achievement, and whether there is the interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement. This research is in the form of quantitative research. The sample was taken using a simple random sampling technique where the experimental class was taught using the PBL learning model and the control class was taught using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique used the Questionnaire method for AQ data and the test method for students' mathematics learning achievement data. The data technique used a two-way unequal cell analysis of variance test with a 2×3 matrix and a further test using the Scheffe test. The results of hypothesis testing with a significance level (α) = 5% indicate that there is a difference in the effect of the learning model on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=19.97 and Fα=4.13), there are differences in the effect of each AQ category on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=94.59 and Fα=3.28), and there is no interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=2.39 and Fα=3.28).","PeriodicalId":33561,"journal":{"name":"Edumatica Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edumatica Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.7670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovative learning models have an influence on student achievement. This study aims to determine whether the PBL learning model is more effective than the STAD learning model (learning model that has been applied in schools) on mathematics learning achievement, whether there is a difference in the effect of the AQ of climber, camper, and quitter category students on mathematics learning achievement, and whether there is the interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement. This research is in the form of quantitative research. The sample was taken using a simple random sampling technique where the experimental class was taught using the PBL learning model and the control class was taught using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique used the Questionnaire method for AQ data and the test method for students' mathematics learning achievement data. The data technique used a two-way unequal cell analysis of variance test with a 2×3 matrix and a further test using the Scheffe test. The results of hypothesis testing with a significance level (α) = 5% indicate that there is a difference in the effect of the learning model on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=19.97 and Fα=4.13), there are differences in the effect of each AQ category on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=94.59 and Fα=3.28), and there is no interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=2.39 and Fα=3.28).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于问题的学习(PBL)对学生逆境商(AQ)数学学习成绩的影响
创新学习模式对学生的学习成绩有影响。本研究旨在确定PBL学习模式是否比STAD学习模式(已在学校应用的学习模式)对数学学习成果更有效,攀岩类、露营类和放弃类学生的AQ对数学学习成果的影响是否存在差异,学习模式与学生的AQ对数学学习成果的影响是否存在交互作用。本研究采用定量研究的形式。样本采用简单的随机抽样技术,实验组采用PBL学习模式,对照组采用STAD学习模式。在数据收集技术上,对学生数学学习成绩数据采用问卷调查法,对学生数学学习成绩数据采用测试法。数据技术使用2×3矩阵的双向不等单元分析方差检验和使用Scheffe检验的进一步检验。假设检验(α) = 5%的显著性水平表明,学习模式对数学学习成就的影响存在差异(Fobs=19.97, Fα=4.13),各AQ类别对数学学习成就的影响存在差异(Fobs=94.59, Fα=3.28),学习模式与学生的AQ对数学学习成就的影响不存在交互作用(Fobs=2.39, Fα=3.28)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of Interactive Learning Multimedia Based on Articulate Storyline 3 on Social Arithmetic Materials for Class VII Students of SMP Negeri 12 Merangin Effect of Problem Based Learning Models Using Contextual Worksheets on Middle School Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Discipline Character and Religious Character: The Effect on Students' Numerical Ability Kalibrasi Instrumen Literasi Matematika Siswa Menggunakan IRT dan Aplikasinya untuk Estimasi Skor Penerapan Model Project Based Learning Berbasis DGMATH untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1