HIIT vs. MICT to Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Exercise Capacity in Older Adult

Yang Yang, Youxiang Cao, Jiacheng Chen, Guangxuan Hu, Bo Chang, Xuejie Yi
{"title":"HIIT vs. MICT to Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Exercise Capacity in Older Adult","authors":"Yang Yang, Youxiang Cao, Jiacheng Chen, Guangxuan Hu, Bo Chang, Xuejie Yi","doi":"10.23937/2469-5718/1510256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have shown that High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is effective in improving maximal oxygen uptake, blood pressure, and physical health-related indicators in older adults. However, whether HIIT is more effective in improving cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity in older adults compared with Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICT) remains controversial. This review and META analysis assessed the outcomes associated with HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity in older adults by searching five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) (built to July 2022). Relevant studies were included using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool; statistical analyses were performed using REVMAN software. HIIT significantly improved VO 2max (HIIT vs. MICT) (weighted mean difference = 1.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-2.35, p < 0.001) and maximal heart rate, ventilation maximal power output compared to the MICT protocol. Subgroup analysis determined that training period < 12 weeks, training frequency three times/week, 20 min per intervention, < 80% intensity VO 2 peak, 3 repetitions, < 60s per training session, and ≤ 90s rest time had the greatest effect on VO 2 max. Compared with MICT, HIIT was more effective in improving cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity in older adults.","PeriodicalId":91298,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports and exercise medicine","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports and exercise medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5718/1510256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is effective in improving maximal oxygen uptake, blood pressure, and physical health-related indicators in older adults. However, whether HIIT is more effective in improving cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity in older adults compared with Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise (MICT) remains controversial. This review and META analysis assessed the outcomes associated with HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity in older adults by searching five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) (built to July 2022). Relevant studies were included using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool; statistical analyses were performed using REVMAN software. HIIT significantly improved VO 2max (HIIT vs. MICT) (weighted mean difference = 1.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-2.35, p < 0.001) and maximal heart rate, ventilation maximal power output compared to the MICT protocol. Subgroup analysis determined that training period < 12 weeks, training frequency three times/week, 20 min per intervention, < 80% intensity VO 2 peak, 3 repetitions, < 60s per training session, and ≤ 90s rest time had the greatest effect on VO 2 max. Compared with MICT, HIIT was more effective in improving cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity in older adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HIIT vs. MICT改善老年人心肺健康和运动能力
先前的研究表明,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)在改善老年人最大摄氧量、血压和身体健康指标方面是有效的。然而,与中等强度连续运动(MICT)相比,HIIT是否更有效地改善老年人的心肺健康和运动能力仍存在争议。本综述和META分析通过检索5个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、SPORTDiscus、Scopus和Cochrane Library)(建立至2022年7月),评估了HIIT对老年人心肺健康和运动能力的相关结果。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具纳入相关研究;采用REVMAN软件进行统计学分析。与MICT方案相比,HIIT显著改善了VO 2max (HIIT vs. MICT)(加权平均差= 1.80,95%可信区间:1.25-2.35,p < 0.001)和最大心率、通气最大功率输出。亚组分析发现,训练时间< 12周、训练频率3次/周、每次干预20分钟、VO 2峰值强度< 80%、重复3次、每次训练< 60s、休息时间≤90s对VO 2 max的影响最大。与MICT相比,HIIT在改善老年人心肺健康和运动能力方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Screening for Relative Energy Deficiency in Male Volleyball Players and the Usefulness of Accelerometers Detraining in Older Women: Influence of Previous Resistance Training with Different Exercise Orders on Muscular Strength, Flexibility and Functional Capacity HIIT vs. MICT to Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Exercise Capacity in Older Adult The Effect of Short-Term Hyperbaric Treatment on Long COVID Symptoms: A Pilot Study Comparison of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior among Brazilian Preschool Children during the COVID-19 Physical Distancing Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1