NPM in Indonesia: Budget Restructuring, Privatisation and Civil Service Reform

A. Pratama
{"title":"NPM in Indonesia: Budget Restructuring, Privatisation and Civil Service Reform","authors":"A. Pratama","doi":"10.21776/UB.JPAS.2019.004.01.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to evaluate the application of New Public Management (NPM) in Indonesia’s public sector through a brief description of public sector reform implementation and its impact to achieve better management practices and quality of public service delivery. The global advice of NPM-based reform suggests that public sector reform should be focused on management of public spending, management of public enterprises, and civil service reform. Based on this premise, the main analysis on Indonesia’s NPM included national budget restructuring, privatisation on parastatals, and bureaucratic reform. Indonesia’s budget restructuring obtained more adequate progress than both privatisation and civil service reform because of its high degree in managerial autonomy and relatively free political environment. Further research is needed to validate this proposition and to explain why NPM succeed in some areas and fail in others.","PeriodicalId":53100,"journal":{"name":"JPAS Journal of Public Administration Studies","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPAS Journal of Public Administration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/UB.JPAS.2019.004.01.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the application of New Public Management (NPM) in Indonesia’s public sector through a brief description of public sector reform implementation and its impact to achieve better management practices and quality of public service delivery. The global advice of NPM-based reform suggests that public sector reform should be focused on management of public spending, management of public enterprises, and civil service reform. Based on this premise, the main analysis on Indonesia’s NPM included national budget restructuring, privatisation on parastatals, and bureaucratic reform. Indonesia’s budget restructuring obtained more adequate progress than both privatisation and civil service reform because of its high degree in managerial autonomy and relatively free political environment. Further research is needed to validate this proposition and to explain why NPM succeed in some areas and fail in others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼的国家预防机制:预算重组、私有化和公务员制度改革
本文旨在通过简要描述公共部门改革实施及其对实现更好的管理实践和公共服务提供质量的影响,评估新公共管理(NPM)在印度尼西亚公共部门的应用。基于新方案的改革的全球建议表明,公共部门改革应侧重于公共支出管理、公共企业管理和公务员制度改革。基于这一前提,对印尼NPM的主要分析包括国家预算重组、半国有企业私有化和官僚改革。印度尼西亚的预算结构调整比私有化和公务员制度改革都取得了更充分的进展,这是由于其高度的管理自治和相对自由的政治环境。需要进一步的研究来验证这一命题,并解释为什么NPM在某些领域成功而在其他领域失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
SettingsThe Efficacy of Community Participation Towards Land Use Planning in South African Local Municipalities Cultural Heritage Accounting for Participatory Governance: A Participatory Action Reseach in Pata'padang Village Implementation of Federal Constituency Projects and the Development of Infrastructure in Kogi State (2012-2022) Capital Grants For Local Infrastructure Provision In Perspective Of Allocative Efficiency: Evidence From Indonesia Perception of Quality Service Provision in Local Government Authorities in Tanzania: A Citizen Participation Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1