{"title":"Leading during a pandemic – what the evidence tells us","authors":"A. Harris, Michelle Jones","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2022.2064626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than two years on from the start of the pandemic, most education systems are still coping with the substantial effects of COVID 19. In some countries, schools remain closed and in others, schools are open but barely managing as the virus continues to take its toll on staff and students. Whichever way you look at it, COVID 19 is not leaving any time soon which means ongoing disruption to education and the learning of young people. One thing is certain, the world has shifted on its axis in a way that has fundamentally and radically changed education. Hybrid learning is now prevalent, and technology has become essential for continuous learning to take place. In many ways, education has been re-defined in this pandemic as an experience where the personal connection between teachers and students has been interrupted. Despite the dominant discourse around ‘learning loss’ which is unquestionably real and important, it is also essential to recognise that new learning happened during the height of the pandemic. Educators and students learned to be flexible, resilient, and adaptable. Those in leadership roles learned to connect with their colleagues and stakeholders remotely, to lead differently in the crisis and above all, to ensure learning and teaching continued. Parents and carers learned to support learning in the home, while juggling their many other responsibilities. Yet, despite a return to a certain degree of normality, the pressures on school leaders and their staff remain relentless and acute. All those working in schools are still dealing with the effects of the pandemic day by day, week by week, month by month. The continuous pressure on school leaders has resulted in high numbers choosing to leave the profession and a raft of unfilled vacancies for headship.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"2015 1","pages":"105 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2064626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
More than two years on from the start of the pandemic, most education systems are still coping with the substantial effects of COVID 19. In some countries, schools remain closed and in others, schools are open but barely managing as the virus continues to take its toll on staff and students. Whichever way you look at it, COVID 19 is not leaving any time soon which means ongoing disruption to education and the learning of young people. One thing is certain, the world has shifted on its axis in a way that has fundamentally and radically changed education. Hybrid learning is now prevalent, and technology has become essential for continuous learning to take place. In many ways, education has been re-defined in this pandemic as an experience where the personal connection between teachers and students has been interrupted. Despite the dominant discourse around ‘learning loss’ which is unquestionably real and important, it is also essential to recognise that new learning happened during the height of the pandemic. Educators and students learned to be flexible, resilient, and adaptable. Those in leadership roles learned to connect with their colleagues and stakeholders remotely, to lead differently in the crisis and above all, to ensure learning and teaching continued. Parents and carers learned to support learning in the home, while juggling their many other responsibilities. Yet, despite a return to a certain degree of normality, the pressures on school leaders and their staff remain relentless and acute. All those working in schools are still dealing with the effects of the pandemic day by day, week by week, month by month. The continuous pressure on school leaders has resulted in high numbers choosing to leave the profession and a raft of unfilled vacancies for headship.
期刊介绍:
School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.