Carbon Footprint of Different Harvesting Work Systems in Short Rotation Energy Plantations

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.2478/aslh-2018-0008
A. Polgár, A. Horváth, K. S. Mátyás, A. Horváth, J. Rumpf, A. Vágvölgyi
{"title":"Carbon Footprint of Different Harvesting Work Systems in Short Rotation Energy Plantations","authors":"A. Polgár, A. Horváth, K. S. Mátyás, A. Horváth, J. Rumpf, A. Vágvölgyi","doi":"10.2478/aslh-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Almost half of the total area of Hungary is arable land. Nearly one-third of this area is poor-quality arable land where agriculture would be uneconomical. Energy plantations can be grown extremely well on poor-quality land. Currently, the carbon neutrality of wood as a raw material must also be justified, considering several factors. Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) was developed as a tool for sustainable, decision-supporting, environmental management, which is an outstanding tool for the well-established analysis of environmental impacts, although the application of it in forestry remained a challenge for the LCA community. No sector specific LCA and life cycle inventory methodology has been developed in forestry; thus, implementing such a methodology remains a big challenge. Calculated on a common functional unit (100 m3/ha wood chips, 100% energy purpose), we have performed a comparative environmental life cycle assessment for harvesting technologies of short rotation energy plantations (technology related to stands of 3 ha of poplar, 5–10 ha of willow, 20 ha of willow), specifically for the third year harvesting work system. Research results on global warming potential show the carbon footprint of harvesting work systems, the knowledge of which has a strong influence on the environmental consideration of raw material (wood chips) and also on the more precise definition of carbon sequestration capacity. The typical values of carbon balance ratio (1.37–1.46) indicate a positive carbon sequestration potential and a magnitude well within the system boundaries of the third year harvesting work system submodule. The results obtained enable the estimation and prediction of environmental impacts for the whole lifecycle of the plantation.","PeriodicalId":53620,"journal":{"name":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aslh-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Almost half of the total area of Hungary is arable land. Nearly one-third of this area is poor-quality arable land where agriculture would be uneconomical. Energy plantations can be grown extremely well on poor-quality land. Currently, the carbon neutrality of wood as a raw material must also be justified, considering several factors. Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) was developed as a tool for sustainable, decision-supporting, environmental management, which is an outstanding tool for the well-established analysis of environmental impacts, although the application of it in forestry remained a challenge for the LCA community. No sector specific LCA and life cycle inventory methodology has been developed in forestry; thus, implementing such a methodology remains a big challenge. Calculated on a common functional unit (100 m3/ha wood chips, 100% energy purpose), we have performed a comparative environmental life cycle assessment for harvesting technologies of short rotation energy plantations (technology related to stands of 3 ha of poplar, 5–10 ha of willow, 20 ha of willow), specifically for the third year harvesting work system. Research results on global warming potential show the carbon footprint of harvesting work systems, the knowledge of which has a strong influence on the environmental consideration of raw material (wood chips) and also on the more precise definition of carbon sequestration capacity. The typical values of carbon balance ratio (1.37–1.46) indicate a positive carbon sequestration potential and a magnitude well within the system boundaries of the third year harvesting work system submodule. The results obtained enable the estimation and prediction of environmental impacts for the whole lifecycle of the plantation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短期轮作能源人工林不同采收作业系统的碳足迹
匈牙利的耕地几乎占国土总面积的一半。该地区近三分之一的耕地质量较差,农业不经济。能源种植园可以在贫瘠的土地上生长得非常好。目前,考虑到几个因素,木材作为原材料的碳中性也必须是合理的。环境生命周期评价(LCA)作为一种可持续的、支持决策的环境管理工具而发展起来,它是一种完善的环境影响分析的杰出工具,尽管它在林业中的应用仍然是LCA社区面临的挑战。林业没有发展出特定部门的生命周期分析和生命周期清查方法;因此,实现这样的方法仍然是一个很大的挑战。在一个共同的功能单位(100立方米/公顷木屑,100%的能源用途)上计算,我们对短轮作能源人工林的采伐技术(与3公顷杨树、5-10公顷柳树、20公顷柳树相关的技术)进行了比较的环境生命周期评估,特别是对第三年采伐工作系统。关于全球变暖潜势的研究结果显示了采伐工作系统的碳足迹,这方面的知识对原材料(木屑)的环境考虑以及对碳固存能力的更精确定义有很强的影响。碳平衡比的典型值(1.37 ~ 1.46)表明具有正的固碳潜力,其幅度完全在第三年采收工作系统子模块的系统边界内。所得结果可用于估算和预测人工林全生命周期的环境影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Re-parametrization of the DAS Model Based on 2016-2021 Data of the National Forestry Database: New Results on Cutting Age Distributions A Comparative Study of Hungarian and Indian University Students’ Attitudes Toward Forestry Comparative Studies on Leaf Micromorphology of the Abaxial Surface of Quercus robur L. subsp. robur and Quercus robur L. subsp. pedunculiflora (K. KOCH) MENITSKY Effects of Red Mud on Plant Growth in an Artificial Soil Mixture Social Network Analysis in Wood Industry Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1