“Clinicoradiological Score – Valuable Tool to Assess the Risk of Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction in Tertiary Care Center”

Gunasekaran Monisha, M. S, H. Ranganath
{"title":"“Clinicoradiological Score – Valuable Tool to Assess the Risk of Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction in Tertiary Care Center”","authors":"Gunasekaran Monisha, M. S, H. Ranganath","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1761416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Small bowel obstruction accounts for about 3% of the emergency laparotomies, hence there is a need for early recognition of the risk associated with strangulated small bowel obstruction. However, there is no single reliable tool for evaluating the bowel strangulation risk precisely and quickly, hence we sought to assess the specificity and sensitivity of a scoring system named “Clinicoradiological score” as a tool to assess the risk of strangulated small bowel obstruction in tertiary care center for early intervention. Methods  The study was an observational study conducted on 50 patients with clinical symptoms of small intestinal obstruction, diagnosed by CT and admitted in-patient basis at the general surgery department in the hospitals attached to Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru from November 2017 to May 2019. In this scoring system, one point was given to each factor which includes pain duration (4 or more days), guarding, leucocyte count at least 10 ×10 9 /L, C-reactive protein 75 mg/L or more, free fluid at least 500 mL (CT criteria), reduced wall contrast enhancement (CT criteria) leading to a maximum score of 6. Statistics  Based on standard treatment outcome, patients were grouped into three categories (conservative management, laparotomy without resection and anastomosis, and laparotomy with resection and anastomosis). Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics. The risk factors were compared between three patient groups and Chi-square test used for hypothesis testing. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for accuracy of score. Results  Out of the six factors of Clinicoradiological score, five factors were found to be predictors ( p -value <0.01), while history of pain more than 3 days did not have a significant p -value. In our study all 18 patients with score more than 3 had gangrenous changes and underwent resection. The p -value of the score was found to be significant. Conclusion  Clinicoradiological score has been proved to be a valuable tool in predicting the risk of strangulated small bowel obstruction and ascertained the need for subsequent intestinal resection.","PeriodicalId":34302,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background  Small bowel obstruction accounts for about 3% of the emergency laparotomies, hence there is a need for early recognition of the risk associated with strangulated small bowel obstruction. However, there is no single reliable tool for evaluating the bowel strangulation risk precisely and quickly, hence we sought to assess the specificity and sensitivity of a scoring system named “Clinicoradiological score” as a tool to assess the risk of strangulated small bowel obstruction in tertiary care center for early intervention. Methods  The study was an observational study conducted on 50 patients with clinical symptoms of small intestinal obstruction, diagnosed by CT and admitted in-patient basis at the general surgery department in the hospitals attached to Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru from November 2017 to May 2019. In this scoring system, one point was given to each factor which includes pain duration (4 or more days), guarding, leucocyte count at least 10 ×10 9 /L, C-reactive protein 75 mg/L or more, free fluid at least 500 mL (CT criteria), reduced wall contrast enhancement (CT criteria) leading to a maximum score of 6. Statistics  Based on standard treatment outcome, patients were grouped into three categories (conservative management, laparotomy without resection and anastomosis, and laparotomy with resection and anastomosis). Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics. The risk factors were compared between three patient groups and Chi-square test used for hypothesis testing. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for accuracy of score. Results  Out of the six factors of Clinicoradiological score, five factors were found to be predictors ( p -value <0.01), while history of pain more than 3 days did not have a significant p -value. In our study all 18 patients with score more than 3 had gangrenous changes and underwent resection. The p -value of the score was found to be significant. Conclusion  Clinicoradiological score has been proved to be a valuable tool in predicting the risk of strangulated small bowel obstruction and ascertained the need for subsequent intestinal resection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“临床放射学评分-评估三级保健中心绞窄性小肠阻塞风险的宝贵工具”
背景小肠梗阻约占急诊剖腹手术的3%,因此需要早期认识绞窄性小肠梗阻的相关风险。然而,目前还没有一种可靠的工具可以准确、快速地评估肠绞窄风险,因此,我们试图评估一种名为“临床放射学评分”的评分系统的特异性和敏感性,作为评估三级保健中心绞窄性小肠梗阻风险的工具,以进行早期干预。方法对2017年11月至2019年5月在班加罗尔医学院附属医院普通外科住院的50例经CT诊断有小肠梗阻临床症状的患者进行观察性研究。在这个评分系统中,每个因素都给1分,包括疼痛持续时间(4天或更长)、保护、白细胞计数至少10 ×10 9 /L、c反应蛋白75 mg/L或更多、游离液至少500 mL (CT标准)、壁增强减弱(CT标准),最高得分为6分。根据标准治疗结果,将患者分为保守治疗、开腹不切除吻合、开腹切除吻合3组。数据采用描述性统计进行分析。比较三组患者的危险因素,采用卡方检验进行假设检验。对评分的准确性进行敏感性和特异性评估。结果在临床放射学评分的6个因素中,有5个因素是预测因子(p值<0.01),而疼痛史大于3 d无显著p值。在我们的研究中,所有18例评分超过3分的患者都发生了坏疽性改变并进行了切除。发现得分的p值具有显著性。结论临床放射学评分是预测绞窄性小肠梗阻风险和确定后续肠切除术必要性的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Sectional Study of Etiology and Clinico-Hematological Profile of Pancytopenia in Children at Tertiary Care Centre in Western India Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Environment for Post-Operative Pain Management A Study of Blood Viscosity and Inflammatory Biomarkers’ Levels in Bilateral Primary Varicose Veins/Reticular Veins as Predictive Markers A Study to Assess the Burden of Hematological Malignancies at a Tertiary Care Center A Study to Assess the Burden of Hematological Malignancies at a Tertiary Care Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1