{"title":"The Metamorphosis of Mannerism in Russian Poetry at the Turn of the 19th–20th Centuries: Valery Bryusov and Nikolay Gumilev","authors":"S. Titarenko","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-2-182-199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is dedicated to the insufficiently studied topic concerning comparative analysis of European mannerism and neo-mannerist tendencies in Russian modernist poetry. The basis of this analysis is formed by ideas of Ernst Robert Curtius regarding mannerism as a constant theme in European literature and classic art history studies (Max Dvořák, Erwin Panofsky) and modern philological studies dedicated to this style of the 16th century. The article examines the poems from early poetry collections by Valery Bryusov, such as “Juvenilia” (1892–1894), “Chefs d’oeuvre” (1894–1896), “Mе eum esse” (1896–1897), and “Pearls” (1910) by Nikolay Gumilev. It demonstrates that the neo-mannerism in Bryusov’s and Gumilev’s poetry was brought upon by influence of French culture and Art Nouveau style, which reveals in the creation of the contingent, aestheticized and exotic image of the world. The poets use techniques of theatricalization in order to develop plots. A complexity of poetic manner is characteristic, principles of surprise poetics are created in line with it. The picturesque scenes, motifs of narcissism and love games are varied. The topoi of mannerism or early baroque are used. It allows us to talk about the actualization of mannerist model of thinking that embody ideas of aesthetic rebel against tradition.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-2-182-199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article is dedicated to the insufficiently studied topic concerning comparative analysis of European mannerism and neo-mannerist tendencies in Russian modernist poetry. The basis of this analysis is formed by ideas of Ernst Robert Curtius regarding mannerism as a constant theme in European literature and classic art history studies (Max Dvořák, Erwin Panofsky) and modern philological studies dedicated to this style of the 16th century. The article examines the poems from early poetry collections by Valery Bryusov, such as “Juvenilia” (1892–1894), “Chefs d’oeuvre” (1894–1896), “Mе eum esse” (1896–1897), and “Pearls” (1910) by Nikolay Gumilev. It demonstrates that the neo-mannerism in Bryusov’s and Gumilev’s poetry was brought upon by influence of French culture and Art Nouveau style, which reveals in the creation of the contingent, aestheticized and exotic image of the world. The poets use techniques of theatricalization in order to develop plots. A complexity of poetic manner is characteristic, principles of surprise poetics are created in line with it. The picturesque scenes, motifs of narcissism and love games are varied. The topoi of mannerism or early baroque are used. It allows us to talk about the actualization of mannerist model of thinking that embody ideas of aesthetic rebel against tradition.
本文致力于对俄罗斯现代主义诗歌中欧洲风格主义与新风格主义倾向的比较分析这一研究不足的主题。这种分析的基础是由恩斯特·罗伯特·柯提乌斯(Ernst Robert Curtius)的观点形成的,他认为风格主义是欧洲文学和古典艺术史研究(马克斯Dvořák, Erwin Panofsky)和16世纪致力于这种风格的现代语言学研究的恒定主题。本文考察了瓦列里·布留索夫早期诗集中的诗歌,如《少女》(1892-1894)、《开胃菜》(1894-1896)、《小姐》(1896-1897)和尼古拉·古米列夫的《珍珠》(1910)。分析表明,布留索夫和古米列夫诗歌中的新风格主义是受法国文化和新艺术风格的影响而产生的,表现在对偶然的、审美化的、异国情调的世界形象的塑造上。诗人运用戏剧化的技巧来发展情节。诗歌方式的复杂性是其特点,惊喜诗学的原则与之相适应。风景如画的场景、自恋的主题和爱情游戏是多种多样的。风格主义或早期巴洛克风格的主题被使用。它使我们得以探讨体现美学反叛传统思想的矫饰主义思维模式的实现。