Evaluation of the anti-erosion performance of PLA and ABS materials with two different micro textures

R. Singh Sidhu, Gurmeet Singh, H.P.S. Gill
{"title":"Evaluation of the anti-erosion performance of PLA and ABS materials with two different micro textures","authors":"R. Singh Sidhu, Gurmeet Singh, H.P.S. Gill","doi":"10.1108/prt-10-2022-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis empirical study aims to investigate the erosion wear performance of two different 3D-printed materials (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene [ABS] and polylactic acid [PLA]) with various micro textures. The two different textures (prism and square) were created over the surfaces of both materials by using the 3D-printed technique.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe erosion experiments on both materials were performed by using Ducom Erosion Jet Tester. Erosion tests were performed at four different impacting velocities (15, 30, 45 and 60 m/s) with the four different particle sizes (17, 39, 63 97 µm) at the impact angles (30°–90°) for the time duration of 5, 10, 15 and 20 min. The two different textures prism and cone were used for performing the erosion experiments. Taguchi’s orthogonal L16 (mixed level) was used to reduce the number of experiments and to determine the impact of these parameters on erosion wear performance of both 3D-printed materials.\n\n\nFindings\nThe PLA with cone texture was found to be best (against erosion) than the ABS cone and prism textures due to their high hardness (68 HV). Also, the average signal to noise (S/N) ratio for PLA and ABS was measured as 56.4 and 44.4 dB, respectively. As the value of the S/N ratio is inversely proportional to the erosion rate, the PLA has the least erosion rate as compared to the ABS. The sequence of erosion wear influencing parameters for both materials was in the following order: velocity > erodent size > texture > impact angle > time interval.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBoth PLA and ABS with different micro textures for erosion testing were studied with Taguchi’s optimization method, and the erosion mechanisms are well analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy and Image J techniques.\n","PeriodicalId":20147,"journal":{"name":"Pigment & Resin Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pigment & Resin Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/prt-10-2022-0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This empirical study aims to investigate the erosion wear performance of two different 3D-printed materials (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene [ABS] and polylactic acid [PLA]) with various micro textures. The two different textures (prism and square) were created over the surfaces of both materials by using the 3D-printed technique. Design/methodology/approach The erosion experiments on both materials were performed by using Ducom Erosion Jet Tester. Erosion tests were performed at four different impacting velocities (15, 30, 45 and 60 m/s) with the four different particle sizes (17, 39, 63 97 µm) at the impact angles (30°–90°) for the time duration of 5, 10, 15 and 20 min. The two different textures prism and cone were used for performing the erosion experiments. Taguchi’s orthogonal L16 (mixed level) was used to reduce the number of experiments and to determine the impact of these parameters on erosion wear performance of both 3D-printed materials. Findings The PLA with cone texture was found to be best (against erosion) than the ABS cone and prism textures due to their high hardness (68 HV). Also, the average signal to noise (S/N) ratio for PLA and ABS was measured as 56.4 and 44.4 dB, respectively. As the value of the S/N ratio is inversely proportional to the erosion rate, the PLA has the least erosion rate as compared to the ABS. The sequence of erosion wear influencing parameters for both materials was in the following order: velocity > erodent size > texture > impact angle > time interval. Originality/value Both PLA and ABS with different micro textures for erosion testing were studied with Taguchi’s optimization method, and the erosion mechanisms are well analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy and Image J techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同微织构的PLA和ABS材料抗冲蚀性能评价
本实证研究旨在研究两种不同微观结构的3d打印材料(丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯[ABS]和聚乳酸[PLA])的冲蚀磨损性能。通过使用3d打印技术,在两种材料的表面上创建了两种不同的纹理(棱镜和正方形)。设计/方法/方法采用Ducom冲蚀射流测试仪对两种材料进行冲蚀试验。以4种不同的冲击速度(15、30、45和60 m/s)和4种不同的粒径(17、39、63 97µm),在冲击角(30°-90°)下进行5、10、15和20 min的冲蚀试验。采用棱柱和锥体两种不同的织构进行了冲蚀实验。采用田口正交L16(混合水平)减少实验次数,确定这些参数对两种3d打印材料冲蚀磨损性能的影响。研究发现,由于具有较高的硬度(68hv),具有锥体织构的PLA比ABS锥体和棱形织构具有更好的抗腐蚀性能。PLA和ABS的平均信噪比(S/N)分别为56.4和44.4 dB。由于S/N值与冲蚀速率成反比,PLA的冲蚀速率比ABS小。两种材料的冲蚀磨损影响参数顺序为:速度>冲蚀尺寸>织构>冲击角>时间间隔。采用Taguchi优化方法对具有不同微织构的PLA和ABS进行了冲蚀试验研究,并利用扫描电镜和Image J技术对其冲蚀机理进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High performance coating formulation using multifunctional monomers and reinforcing functional fillers for protecting metal substrate Non-invasive measurement of spoilage of packed fish using halochromic sensor Phenoxazine-based fluorescence chemosensor for selective detection of cyanide Enhancing the functional properties and performance of paper via cellulose nanocrystals and funori loaded onto ZnO NPs Applicability of AgNPs/GO/Na2SiO3 nanocomposite as a charged nanosorbent in the removal of cationic and anionic model dyes from water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1