Radiation-induced coronary artery disease: a difficult clinical conundrum.

Q2 Social Sciences Antitrust Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.7861/clinmed.2021-0600
Ali Kirresh, Laura White, Adam Mitchell, Shahzaib Ahmad, Bernard Obika, Sarah Davis, Mahmood Ahmad, Luciano Candilio
{"title":"Radiation-induced coronary artery disease: a difficult clinical conundrum.","authors":"Ali Kirresh, Laura White, Adam Mitchell, Shahzaib Ahmad, Bernard Obika, Sarah Davis, Mahmood Ahmad, Luciano Candilio","doi":"10.7861/clinmed.2021-0600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accelerated coronary artery disease seen following radiation exposure is termed 'radiation-induced coronary artery disease' (RICAD) and results from both the direct and indirect effects of radiation exposure. Long-term data are available from survivors of nuclear explosions and accidents, nuclear workers as well as from radiotherapy patients. The last group is, by far, the biggest cause of RICAD presentation. The incidence of RICAD continues to increase as cancer survival rates improve and it is now the second most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma and other mediastinal malignancies. RICAD will frequently present atypically or even asymptomatically with a latency period of at least 10 years after radiotherapy treatment. An awareness of RICAD, as a long-term complication of radiotherapy, is therefore essential for the cardiologist, oncologist and general medical physician alike. Prior cardiac risk factors, a higher radiation dose and a younger age at exposure seem to increase a patient's risk ratio of developing RICAD. Significant radiation exposure, therefore, requires a low threshold for screening for early diagnosis and timely intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":36832,"journal":{"name":"Antitrust Bulletin","volume":"61 1","pages":"251-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antitrust Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2021-0600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accelerated coronary artery disease seen following radiation exposure is termed 'radiation-induced coronary artery disease' (RICAD) and results from both the direct and indirect effects of radiation exposure. Long-term data are available from survivors of nuclear explosions and accidents, nuclear workers as well as from radiotherapy patients. The last group is, by far, the biggest cause of RICAD presentation. The incidence of RICAD continues to increase as cancer survival rates improve and it is now the second most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma and other mediastinal malignancies. RICAD will frequently present atypically or even asymptomatically with a latency period of at least 10 years after radiotherapy treatment. An awareness of RICAD, as a long-term complication of radiotherapy, is therefore essential for the cardiologist, oncologist and general medical physician alike. Prior cardiac risk factors, a higher radiation dose and a younger age at exposure seem to increase a patient's risk ratio of developing RICAD. Significant radiation exposure, therefore, requires a low threshold for screening for early diagnosis and timely intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辐射诱发冠状动脉疾病:一个棘手的临床难题。
辐照后加速出现的冠状动脉疾病被称为 "辐照诱发冠状动脉疾病"(RICAD),是由辐照的直接和间接影响造成的。核爆和核事故幸存者、核工作人员以及接受放射治疗的病人都提供了长期数据。到目前为止,最后一类患者是导致 RICAD 的最大原因。随着癌症存活率的提高,RICAD 的发病率也在不断上升,目前已成为乳腺癌、霍奇金淋巴瘤和其他纵隔恶性肿瘤放疗患者的第二大常见发病和死亡原因。RICAD 通常表现不典型,甚至无症状,在放疗后至少有 10 年的潜伏期。因此,心脏科医生、肿瘤科医生和普通内科医生都必须认识到 RICAD 是放疗的长期并发症。先前的心脏风险因素、较高的辐射剂量和较年轻的照射年龄似乎会增加患者罹患 RICAD 的风险比。因此,大量的辐射照射需要较低的筛查门槛,以便早期诊断和及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antitrust Bulletin
Antitrust Bulletin Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Geographic Market Definition in Commercial Health Insurer Matters: A Unified Approach for Merger Review, Monopolization Claims, and Monopsonization Claims Do EU and U.K. Antitrust “Bite”?: A Hard Look at “Soft” Enforcement and Negotiated Penalty Settlements Wall Street’s Practice of Compelling Confidentiality of Private Underwriting Fees: An Antitrust Violation? Two Challenges for Neo-Brandeisian Antitrust Epic Battles in Two-Sided Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1