The Influence of Incentives and Instructions on Behaviour in Driving Simulator Studies

C. Harvey, G. Burnett
{"title":"The Influence of Incentives and Instructions on Behaviour in Driving Simulator Studies","authors":"C. Harvey, G. Burnett","doi":"10.1145/2970930.2970948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a number of factors which may influence the validity of experimental studies, including the incentives offered and the instructions provided to participants. These have been little-studied in the driving domain. The aim of this study was to investigate how manipulating these factors influenced participants' feelings of 'presence' (i.e. the extent to which they believed they were actually driving and not in a simulated environment). The findings showed that imposing a penalty system for poor driving performance and providing 'good driving' instructions did not affect presence ratings and this can be explained by the inherent need to perform well under test conditions and the small range of performance variability expected in the driving scenario. Participants in the penalty and instructions conditions gave higher ratings for negative effects (related to physically feeling unwell), suggesting that these conditions made them more aware of the physical symptoms of being in a simulator.","PeriodicalId":93284,"journal":{"name":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2970930.2970948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

There are a number of factors which may influence the validity of experimental studies, including the incentives offered and the instructions provided to participants. These have been little-studied in the driving domain. The aim of this study was to investigate how manipulating these factors influenced participants' feelings of 'presence' (i.e. the extent to which they believed they were actually driving and not in a simulated environment). The findings showed that imposing a penalty system for poor driving performance and providing 'good driving' instructions did not affect presence ratings and this can be explained by the inherent need to perform well under test conditions and the small range of performance variability expected in the driving scenario. Participants in the penalty and instructions conditions gave higher ratings for negative effects (related to physically feeling unwell), suggesting that these conditions made them more aware of the physical symptoms of being in a simulator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驶模拟器研究中激励和指导对行为的影响
有许多因素可能影响实验研究的有效性,包括提供的激励和向参与者提供的指示。这些在驾驶领域的研究很少。这项研究的目的是调查操纵这些因素如何影响参与者的“存在感”(即他们认为自己在实际驾驶而不是在模拟环境中的程度)。研究结果表明,对驾驶表现不佳的人实施惩罚制度,并提供“良好驾驶”的指导,并不影响存在评级,这可以用在测试条件下表现良好的内在需求和驾驶场景中预期的小范围性能变化来解释。惩罚和指示条件下的参与者对负面影响(与身体感觉不适有关)给出了更高的评分,这表明这些条件使他们更加意识到在模拟器中的身体症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time for a change: Reducing perceived waiting time by making it more active A Systematic Literature Review on UCD4D Studies The Cognitive Relevance of a Formal Pre-incision Time-out in Surgery. Musical Elements in Sonification Support Visual Perception Demagnetization study of an interior permanent magnet synchronous machine considering transient peak 3 phase short circuit current
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1