How Many Theranostics Centers Will We Need in the United States?

J. Czernin, J. Calais
{"title":"How Many Theranostics Centers Will We Need in the United States?","authors":"J. Czernin, J. Calais","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.264144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (PLUVICTO) has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for patients with prostatespecific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have been treated with androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy (1). This great success was enabled by the design, execution, and results of the VISION trial (2) and has been awaited with great excitement by patients, their families, and treatment teams. We have previously provided some simplified business forecasts for nuclear theranostics (3). We are expecting a high demand for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted molecular radiotherapy initially—a demand that will further increase as indications expand to earlier disease stages. The randomized phase 2 TheraP trial suggested that Lu-PSMA-617 may achieve better prostate-specific antigen responses and progression-free survival than taxanes (cabazitaxel) as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who progress after docetaxel (4). Several other clinical trials exploring the role of PSMA-targeted molecular radiotherapy, ranging from the neoadjuvant setting to the hormone-sensitive setting to first-line therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, are ongoing or about to start (5). Theranostic centers will also take care of patients with thyroid cancer; neuroendocrine tumors, including paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma; and other cancer types in the future. How and where will we be able to provide the best care for our patients? First, we must establish competence. Implementing training and accreditation standards is an essential prerequisite. Two articles, one from experts in Australia and the other from the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the International Atomic Energy Agency, will soon be published in The Journal of Nuclear Medicine and provide guidance. Second, we must create a robust supply chain. Given the limited production capacities that are further at risk by the current geopolitical uncertainties, a robust supply chain of therapeutic isotopes is critically important. Failure to deliver therapies reliably will reliably deliver failure of the approach. This is both a challenge and an opportunity for industry and academia, as new production strategies could be developed jointly. Third, we must establish a large number of theranostic centers. The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors is increasing, being currently estimated at 12,000–15,000 new cases per year in the United States, with an estimated prevalence of 170,000 cases (6). Half the newly diagnosed patients will undergo surgery, but many will experience slowly progressing disease. As a conservative estimate, and assuming that late-stage rather than earlier-stage patients are treated, around 7,500 patients per year might benefit from therapy with Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera; Advanced Accelerator Applications). Patients usually undergo 4 cycles, which translates into 30,000 cycles per year in the United States (Table 1). Most patients who have end-stage prostate cancer and progress after chemotherapy are potential candidates for PSMA-targeted molecular radiotherapy ( 40,000 patients per year) (7). PSMA PET screening may exclude 6,000 of these 40,000 patients (15%) from LuPSMA therapy (8). We assume that the 50% of patients who are nonresponding would discontinue treatment after 2 cycles whereas the responders would complete the 4–6 scheduled cycles. Thus, we estimate that 34,000 patients will need a total of around 120,000 treatment cycles. Taken together, 41,500 patients would require 150,000 treatment cycles of lutetium-based molecular radiotherapy per year for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer (Table 1). At least 70 treatment sites, each providing 8 cycles per day, would be required to deliver approximately 150,000 cycles (assuming Johannes Czernin","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (PLUVICTO) has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for patients with prostatespecific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have been treated with androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy (1). This great success was enabled by the design, execution, and results of the VISION trial (2) and has been awaited with great excitement by patients, their families, and treatment teams. We have previously provided some simplified business forecasts for nuclear theranostics (3). We are expecting a high demand for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted molecular radiotherapy initially—a demand that will further increase as indications expand to earlier disease stages. The randomized phase 2 TheraP trial suggested that Lu-PSMA-617 may achieve better prostate-specific antigen responses and progression-free survival than taxanes (cabazitaxel) as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who progress after docetaxel (4). Several other clinical trials exploring the role of PSMA-targeted molecular radiotherapy, ranging from the neoadjuvant setting to the hormone-sensitive setting to first-line therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, are ongoing or about to start (5). Theranostic centers will also take care of patients with thyroid cancer; neuroendocrine tumors, including paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma; and other cancer types in the future. How and where will we be able to provide the best care for our patients? First, we must establish competence. Implementing training and accreditation standards is an essential prerequisite. Two articles, one from experts in Australia and the other from the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the International Atomic Energy Agency, will soon be published in The Journal of Nuclear Medicine and provide guidance. Second, we must create a robust supply chain. Given the limited production capacities that are further at risk by the current geopolitical uncertainties, a robust supply chain of therapeutic isotopes is critically important. Failure to deliver therapies reliably will reliably deliver failure of the approach. This is both a challenge and an opportunity for industry and academia, as new production strategies could be developed jointly. Third, we must establish a large number of theranostic centers. The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors is increasing, being currently estimated at 12,000–15,000 new cases per year in the United States, with an estimated prevalence of 170,000 cases (6). Half the newly diagnosed patients will undergo surgery, but many will experience slowly progressing disease. As a conservative estimate, and assuming that late-stage rather than earlier-stage patients are treated, around 7,500 patients per year might benefit from therapy with Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera; Advanced Accelerator Applications). Patients usually undergo 4 cycles, which translates into 30,000 cycles per year in the United States (Table 1). Most patients who have end-stage prostate cancer and progress after chemotherapy are potential candidates for PSMA-targeted molecular radiotherapy ( 40,000 patients per year) (7). PSMA PET screening may exclude 6,000 of these 40,000 patients (15%) from LuPSMA therapy (8). We assume that the 50% of patients who are nonresponding would discontinue treatment after 2 cycles whereas the responders would complete the 4–6 scheduled cycles. Thus, we estimate that 34,000 patients will need a total of around 120,000 treatment cycles. Taken together, 41,500 patients would require 150,000 treatment cycles of lutetium-based molecular radiotherapy per year for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer (Table 1). At least 70 treatment sites, each providing 8 cycles per day, would be required to deliver approximately 150,000 cycles (assuming Johannes Czernin
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国需要多少个治疗中心?
Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (PLUVICTO)已被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)阳性转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者,这些患者已接受雄激素受体(AR)途径抑制和紫紫烷为基础的化疗(1)。这一巨大的成功是由VISION试验的设计、执行和结果所实现的(2)。还有治疗团队。我们之前提供了一些简化的核治疗业务预测(3)。我们预计最初对前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)靶向分子放疗的需求很高,随着适应症扩展到早期疾病阶段,这一需求将进一步增加。随机2期TheraP试验表明,在多西紫杉醇治疗后进展的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者中,作为二线治疗,Lu-PSMA-617可能比紫杉烷(卡巴他赛)获得更好的前列腺特异性抗原应答和无进展生存期(4)。从新辅助治疗到激素敏感治疗,再到转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的一线治疗,都在进行中或即将开始(5)。治疗中心也将照顾甲状腺癌患者;神经内分泌肿瘤,包括副神经节瘤和嗜铬细胞瘤;以及未来其他类型的癌症。我们如何以及在哪里为我们的病人提供最好的护理?首先,我们必须建立能力。执行培训和认证标准是必不可少的先决条件。两篇文章,一篇来自澳大利亚的专家,另一篇来自欧洲核医学协会、核医学和分子成像学会以及国际原子能机构,将很快发表在《核医学杂志》上,并提供指导。第二,我们必须建立健全的供应链。鉴于有限的生产能力受到当前地缘政治不确定性的进一步威胁,健全的治疗用同位素供应链至关重要。不能可靠地提供治疗将会导致治疗方法的失败。这对工业界和学术界来说既是挑战也是机遇,因为新的生产战略可以共同制定。第三,必须建立大量的治疗中心。神经内分泌肿瘤的发病率正在增加,目前在美国每年估计有12,000-15,000例新病例,估计患病率为170,000例(6)。一半的新诊断患者将接受手术,但许多患者将经历缓慢的疾病进展。保守估计,假设治疗晚期而非早期患者,每年约有7500名患者可能受益于Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera;高级加速器应用程序)。患者通常经历4个周期,在美国,这相当于每年30,000个周期(表1)。大多数患有终末期前列腺癌且化疗后进展的患者是PSMA靶向分子放疗的潜在候选者(每年40,000例患者)(7)。PSMA PET筛查可能会将这40,000例患者中的6,000例(15%)从LuPSMA治疗中排除(8)。我们假设50%无反应的患者将在2个周期后停止治疗,而有反应的患者将完成4-6计划周期。因此,我们估计34,000名患者将需要总共约120,000个治疗周期。总的来说,41,500名转移性神经内分泌肿瘤和前列腺癌患者每年需要150,000个治疗周期(表1)。至少70个治疗点,每个每天提供8个周期,将需要提供大约150,000个周期(假设Johannes Czernin)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Precautions to Consider in the Analysis of Prognostic and Predictive Indices Head-to-Head Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Prospective Study [18F]F-AraG Uptake in Vertebral Bone Marrow May Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy Intraarterial Administration of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Advanced Meningioma: Initial Safety and Efficacy MIRD Pamphlet No. 31: MIRDcell V4—Artificial Intelligence Tools to Formulate Optimized Radiopharmaceutical Cocktails for Therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1