Measurement of bacterial adhesion to metal surfaces with different chemical composition - evaluation of different methods

A. Żywicka, K. Fijałkowski
{"title":"Measurement of bacterial adhesion to metal surfaces with different chemical composition - evaluation of different methods","authors":"A. Żywicka, K. Fijałkowski","doi":"10.14799/EBMS28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current study attention has been focused on the evaluation of different methods of measurement of bacterial adhesion to the metal surfaces with different chemical composition. The direct methods, which included determination of the number of bacterial cells using fluorescence microscopy and Colony Forming Units (CFU) on agar medium, and indirect methods using Alamar Blue (AB) and MTT assays, were evaluated. The chemical compositions of the metal surfaces included: copper, iron, chromium and nickel. Interaction effects of assay and metal compound have been specifically demonstrated in this study. It was found that metal ions reacted with components of the indirect colorimetric tests used in this study (AB and MTT assay). Consequently, those tests gave positive false results. In contrast to the indirect methods, direct counting methods such as microscopy techniques and CFU counting, were successfully applied for evaluation of bacterial adhesion to the metal surfaces. However, considering the limits for the surfaces of the examined samples for microscopy, the determination of the CFU was found to be the best method for testing the adhesion to metal surfaces. The method, combined with the appropriate detachment procedures allowed for a precise determination of the number of bacteria on the entire surface of the evaluated metal samples.","PeriodicalId":11733,"journal":{"name":"Environmental biotechnology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14799/EBMS28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the current study attention has been focused on the evaluation of different methods of measurement of bacterial adhesion to the metal surfaces with different chemical composition. The direct methods, which included determination of the number of bacterial cells using fluorescence microscopy and Colony Forming Units (CFU) on agar medium, and indirect methods using Alamar Blue (AB) and MTT assays, were evaluated. The chemical compositions of the metal surfaces included: copper, iron, chromium and nickel. Interaction effects of assay and metal compound have been specifically demonstrated in this study. It was found that metal ions reacted with components of the indirect colorimetric tests used in this study (AB and MTT assay). Consequently, those tests gave positive false results. In contrast to the indirect methods, direct counting methods such as microscopy techniques and CFU counting, were successfully applied for evaluation of bacterial adhesion to the metal surfaces. However, considering the limits for the surfaces of the examined samples for microscopy, the determination of the CFU was found to be the best method for testing the adhesion to metal surfaces. The method, combined with the appropriate detachment procedures allowed for a precise determination of the number of bacteria on the entire surface of the evaluated metal samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同化学成分金属表面细菌粘附量的测定。不同方法的评价
在目前的研究中,人们关注的焦点是对不同化学成分的金属表面细菌粘附的不同测量方法的评价。对直接法(利用荧光显微镜和琼脂培养基上的菌落形成单位(CFU)测定细菌细胞数量)和间接法(利用Alamar Blue (AB)和MTT法)进行了评价。金属表面的化学成分包括:铜、铁、铬和镍。本研究特别证明了测定剂与金属化合物的相互作用。发现金属离子与本研究中使用的间接比色法(AB和MTT法)的组分发生反应。因此,这些测试给出了阳性的错误结果。与间接方法相比,显微镜技术和CFU计数等直接计数方法已成功应用于评估细菌对金属表面的粘附。然而,考虑到检测样品表面的显微镜限制,发现CFU的测定是测试金属表面附着力的最佳方法。该方法与适当的剥离程序相结合,可以精确测定被评估金属样品整个表面上的细菌数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nature-based and technology-based solutions for sustainable blue growth and climate change mitigation in marine biodiversity hotspots Exploring Baltic Sea cyanobacteria for small-molecule inhibitors of microRNA function: a project description New microsatellite multiplex PCR sets for genetic studies of the sterlet sturgeon, Acipenser ruthenus Measurement of bacterial adhesion to metal surfaces with different chemical composition - evaluation of different methods Treatment of simulated oil and gas production wastewater using Typha latifolia in a pilot-scale constructed wetland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1