Determination and Validation of an Analytical Method for Spiropidion and Its Metabolite Spiropidion-enol (SYN547305) in Agricultural Products with LC-MS/MS

S. Gu, Su Jung Lee, Hyesoo Shin, Sung Eun Kang, Y. Chung, Jung Mi Lee, Yong-hyun Jung, Guiim Moon
{"title":"Determination and Validation of an Analytical Method for Spiropidion and Its Metabolite Spiropidion-enol (SYN547305) in Agricultural Products with LC-MS/MS","authors":"S. Gu, Su Jung Lee, Hyesoo Shin, Sung Eun Kang, Y. Chung, Jung Mi Lee, Yong-hyun Jung, Guiim Moon","doi":"10.5338/kjea.2022.41.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Spiropidion and its metabolite are tetramic acid insecticide and require the establishment of an official analysis method for the safety management be-cause they are newly registered in Korea. Therefore, this study was to determine the analysis method of residual spiropidion and its metabolite for the five representative agricultural products. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three QuEChERS methods (original, AOAC, and EN method) were applied to optimize the extraction method, and the EN method was finally selected by comparing the recovery test and matrix effect results. Various adsorbent agents were applied to establish the clean up method. As a result, the recovery of spiropidion was reduced when using the dispersive-SPE method with MgSO 4 , primary secondary amine (PSA), graphitized carbon black (GCB) and octadecyl (C 18 ) in soybean. Color interference was minimized by selecting the case including GCB and C 18 in addition to MgSO 4 . This method was established as the final analysis method. LC-MS/MS was used for the analysis by considering the selectivity and sensitivity of the target pesticide and the analysis was performed in MRM mode. The results of the recovery test using the established analysis method and inter laboratory validation showed a valid range of 79.4-108.4%, with relative standard deviation and coefficient of variation were less than 7.2% and 14.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Spiropidion and its metabolite could be analyzed with a modified QuEChERS method, and the established method would be widely available to ensure the safety of residual insecticides in Korea.","PeriodicalId":17872,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2022.41.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spiropidion and its metabolite are tetramic acid insecticide and require the establishment of an official analysis method for the safety management be-cause they are newly registered in Korea. Therefore, this study was to determine the analysis method of residual spiropidion and its metabolite for the five representative agricultural products. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three QuEChERS methods (original, AOAC, and EN method) were applied to optimize the extraction method, and the EN method was finally selected by comparing the recovery test and matrix effect results. Various adsorbent agents were applied to establish the clean up method. As a result, the recovery of spiropidion was reduced when using the dispersive-SPE method with MgSO 4 , primary secondary amine (PSA), graphitized carbon black (GCB) and octadecyl (C 18 ) in soybean. Color interference was minimized by selecting the case including GCB and C 18 in addition to MgSO 4 . This method was established as the final analysis method. LC-MS/MS was used for the analysis by considering the selectivity and sensitivity of the target pesticide and the analysis was performed in MRM mode. The results of the recovery test using the established analysis method and inter laboratory validation showed a valid range of 79.4-108.4%, with relative standard deviation and coefficient of variation were less than 7.2% and 14.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Spiropidion and its metabolite could be analyzed with a modified QuEChERS method, and the established method would be widely available to ensure the safety of residual insecticides in Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农产品中螺匹啶及其代谢物螺匹啶烯醇(SYN547305)的LC-MS/MS分析方法测定及验证
背景:旋螺啶及其代谢物为四羧酸类杀虫剂,在国内是新注册的农药,需要建立官方的安全管理分析方法。因此,本研究确定了5种代表性农产品中螺啶及其代谢物残留量的分析方法。方法与结果:采用QuEChERS法(original法、AOAC法和EN法)对提取方法进行优化,并通过回收率试验和基质效应结果对比,最终选择EN法。采用不同的吸附剂建立了净化方法。结果表明,用mgso4、伯仲胺(PSA)、石墨化炭黑(GCB)和十八烷基(c18)作为分散-固相萃取剂,大豆中螺皮啶的回收率降低。通过选择除mgso4外还包括GCB和c18的外壳,可以最大限度地减少颜色干扰。建立了该方法作为最终分析方法。考虑目标农药的选择性和敏感性,采用LC-MS/MS进行分析,采用MRM模式进行分析。采用所建立的分析方法和实验室间验证的回收率试验结果表明,有效范围为79.4 ~ 108.4%,相对标准偏差小于7.2%,变异系数小于14.4%。结论(5):改进的QuEChERS方法可用于螺必啶及其代谢物的分析,该方法可在国内推广应用,确保残留杀虫剂的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Application of Rendered Carcass Residue on Greenhouse Gases and Pepper Growth Seed Dormancy and Germination Characteristics of Prunus mandshurica (Maxim.) Koehne Molluscicidal Effect of Eco-Friendly Agricultural Substances for Controlling Golden Apple Snails (Pomacea canaliculata, Lamarck) Growth Response of Lettuce after Application of Mixed Organic Fertilizer Containing Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HSOB-7 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSOB-8 Growth of Creeping Bentgrass after Application of Microbial Fertilizer Containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae HS-1 and Streptococcus thermophiles HS-2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1