{"title":"Creative expansion of knowledge-creating learning","authors":"P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue addresses an important arena of learning that has been neglected by the Journal of the Learning Sciences; that is, “learning in and through arts” in the context of K–12 education. Although some forms of art education (e.g., visual arts, music, design, and technology) are a part of the curriculum in many countries, the educational potential of the arts for learning the creative skills and competences that are crucial for preparing young people for an innovation-driven knowledge society has not been sufficiently explored. The multifaceted articles included in the special issue demonstrate how learning in and through arts significantly expands the scope of knowledge-creating learning (Paavola & Hakkarainen, 2021) in secondary education. Such learning refers to the personal and collaborative processes of creating, sharing, and advancing shared objects, whether in reference to ideas, designs, projects, productions (e.g., performances), or practices being improved. I use here the term “knowledge” in the broadest possible sense to include what is explicit in written text or spoken discourse, implicitly and pre-reflectively informs experts’ creative habits and practices, underlies their motoric and operational competencies, and shapes their creative agency and identities (Hakkarainen, 2009). The arts are not a single discipline, but consist of many intersecting creative fields. Teaching and learning in arts in this special issue represent the visual (drawing, painting, and architecture) and performing arts (ballet and dance). Based on my review of the four articles included in the special issue, I have identified some common themes and recognized crucial differences in the art forms. My commentary is structured as follows: I first address the epistemic objects of arts learning; second, I reflect on the authentic disciplinary practices of art making; third, I consider the domain-specific and domain-general aspects of the learning arts; fourth, I consider the nonlinear pedagogy of learning arts; fifth, I discuss material embodiment; and finally, I observe the interaction between individual and collective processes","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"116 1","pages":"138 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This special issue addresses an important arena of learning that has been neglected by the Journal of the Learning Sciences; that is, “learning in and through arts” in the context of K–12 education. Although some forms of art education (e.g., visual arts, music, design, and technology) are a part of the curriculum in many countries, the educational potential of the arts for learning the creative skills and competences that are crucial for preparing young people for an innovation-driven knowledge society has not been sufficiently explored. The multifaceted articles included in the special issue demonstrate how learning in and through arts significantly expands the scope of knowledge-creating learning (Paavola & Hakkarainen, 2021) in secondary education. Such learning refers to the personal and collaborative processes of creating, sharing, and advancing shared objects, whether in reference to ideas, designs, projects, productions (e.g., performances), or practices being improved. I use here the term “knowledge” in the broadest possible sense to include what is explicit in written text or spoken discourse, implicitly and pre-reflectively informs experts’ creative habits and practices, underlies their motoric and operational competencies, and shapes their creative agency and identities (Hakkarainen, 2009). The arts are not a single discipline, but consist of many intersecting creative fields. Teaching and learning in arts in this special issue represent the visual (drawing, painting, and architecture) and performing arts (ballet and dance). Based on my review of the four articles included in the special issue, I have identified some common themes and recognized crucial differences in the art forms. My commentary is structured as follows: I first address the epistemic objects of arts learning; second, I reflect on the authentic disciplinary practices of art making; third, I consider the domain-specific and domain-general aspects of the learning arts; fourth, I consider the nonlinear pedagogy of learning arts; fifth, I discuss material embodiment; and finally, I observe the interaction between individual and collective processes
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.