Neurocognitive Trends in the Structural-Functional Model of the Lexical-Semantic Way of Word Formation

S. Shestakova, K. Dubinina, I. Anikina, N. Myronova, O. Muratova, T. Radionova
{"title":"Neurocognitive Trends in the Structural-Functional Model of the Lexical-Semantic Way of Word Formation","authors":"S. Shestakova, K. Dubinina, I. Anikina, N. Myronova, O. Muratova, T. Radionova","doi":"10.18662/brain/13.3/365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes traditional views of Ukrainian linguists on the consideration/disregard of neurocognitive factors in the lexical-semantic way of word formation (hereinafter “LSWWF”). The relevance of the article lies in a pronounced divergence in the views, as well as in the contradictions in the interpretation of polysemy as a result of this type of word formation. Research methods include analysis of definitions and basic theories, comparison, extrapolation of a neuroscientific perspective on the cognitive nature of metaphorical generation of new meanings on traditional (structural and functional) approaches to linguistic phenomena. The article proves that Ukrainian linguistics involves prerequisites and basics of cognitive subject-based explanation of secondary semantics, present since the Soviet period, and lacks categorical and methodological tools for its interpretation. Besides, the authors of the article suggest some compromise solutions to these contradictions without completely abandoning traditional views on word formation. The international relevance of the article is seen in its attempts to reconsider the significant traditional achievements of Eastern European linguistics (on the example of Ukraine) in the context of objective natural neurocognitive views on key linguistic processes, in particular LSWWF.","PeriodicalId":44081,"journal":{"name":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.3/365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes traditional views of Ukrainian linguists on the consideration/disregard of neurocognitive factors in the lexical-semantic way of word formation (hereinafter “LSWWF”). The relevance of the article lies in a pronounced divergence in the views, as well as in the contradictions in the interpretation of polysemy as a result of this type of word formation. Research methods include analysis of definitions and basic theories, comparison, extrapolation of a neuroscientific perspective on the cognitive nature of metaphorical generation of new meanings on traditional (structural and functional) approaches to linguistic phenomena. The article proves that Ukrainian linguistics involves prerequisites and basics of cognitive subject-based explanation of secondary semantics, present since the Soviet period, and lacks categorical and methodological tools for its interpretation. Besides, the authors of the article suggest some compromise solutions to these contradictions without completely abandoning traditional views on word formation. The international relevance of the article is seen in its attempts to reconsider the significant traditional achievements of Eastern European linguistics (on the example of Ukraine) in the context of objective natural neurocognitive views on key linguistic processes, in particular LSWWF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词汇-语义构词法结构-功能模型的神经认知趋势
本文分析了乌克兰语言学家在词汇-语义构词法(以下简称“LSWWF”)中考虑/忽视神经认知因素的传统观点。文章的相关性在于观点的明显分歧,以及由于这种构词法而导致的对一词多义解释的矛盾。研究方法包括定义和基本理论分析,比较,从神经科学的角度对隐喻的认知本质进行外推,在传统的(结构和功能)语言现象的方法上产生新的意义。本文论证了乌克兰语言学包含了从苏联时期开始就存在的基于认知主体的次语义解释的前提和基础,并且缺乏对其进行解释的范畴和方法论工具。此外,本文作者在不完全放弃传统构词法观点的前提下,对这些矛盾提出了一些折衷的解决办法。这篇文章的国际相关性体现在它试图重新考虑东欧语言学(以乌克兰为例)在客观自然神经认知观点的背景下对关键语言过程的重要传统成就,特别是LSWWF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
47.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychological Complications During Military Operations in Ukraine: Neurobiological Effects Results of the Implementation of a Comprehensive Socio-Psychological Program to Foster Professional Empathy Among Professionals in the Helping Professions Can Neural Networks Enhance Physics Simulations? National Strategy of Information Society in the Realities of Ukraine Document Image Binarization Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1