Effects of Probiotics on Antioxidant Biochemical Parameters and Antioxidant Enzymes in the Blood, Intestinal Mucosal Tissues and Liver of Broiler Chicks under High Ambient Temperature Conditions

Kang-Min Seomoon, I. Jang
{"title":"Effects of Probiotics on Antioxidant Biochemical Parameters and\n Antioxidant Enzymes in the Blood, Intestinal Mucosal Tissues and Liver of\n Broiler Chicks under High Ambient Temperature Conditions","authors":"Kang-Min Seomoon, I. Jang","doi":"10.5536/kjps.2022.50.2.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four-d-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to 3 groups with 9 replicates (8 birds/cage) under high ambient temperature; birds fed a basal diet (CON), a basal diet supplemented with 0.25% of probiotic complex (LPB, 1 × 10 6 Lactobacillus plantarum , 1 × 10 6 Bacillus subtilis , and 1 × 10 6 Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) and 0.5% probiotic complex (HPB). Immediately after 28-d feeding trial, 6 birds having average body weight per group were sacrificed for evaluating the effects of probiotics on antioxidant parameters in the serum, intestine, and liver of birds. As results, serum biochemical parameters of nitrogen components including total protein, albumin, urea nitrogen, and glutathione were unaffected by dietary probiotics. In addition, serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities, and lipid peroxidation (MDA) were not changed by dietary probiotic supplement in birds. In the intestinal mucosa, SOD activity in the HPB group significantly ( P <0.05) increased compared with that in the CON and the LPB groups. Lipid peroxidation in the HPB group significantly ( P <0.05) decreased compared with that in the CON group. However, there was no statistical difference in GPX, and GST activities in the intestinal mucosa among treatment groups. In the liver, the activities of SOD, GPX, and GST, and the level of MDA were unaffected by probiotic supplement. In conclusion, 0.5% of probiotics significantly increased SOD activity and decreased lipid peroxidation in the intestinal mucosa, suggesting that probiotic complex could be potential to improve the small intestinal antioxidant capacity of bird under high ambient temperature conditions.","PeriodicalId":17845,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2022.50.2.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four-d-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to 3 groups with 9 replicates (8 birds/cage) under high ambient temperature; birds fed a basal diet (CON), a basal diet supplemented with 0.25% of probiotic complex (LPB, 1 × 10 6 Lactobacillus plantarum , 1 × 10 6 Bacillus subtilis , and 1 × 10 6 Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) and 0.5% probiotic complex (HPB). Immediately after 28-d feeding trial, 6 birds having average body weight per group were sacrificed for evaluating the effects of probiotics on antioxidant parameters in the serum, intestine, and liver of birds. As results, serum biochemical parameters of nitrogen components including total protein, albumin, urea nitrogen, and glutathione were unaffected by dietary probiotics. In addition, serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities, and lipid peroxidation (MDA) were not changed by dietary probiotic supplement in birds. In the intestinal mucosa, SOD activity in the HPB group significantly ( P <0.05) increased compared with that in the CON and the LPB groups. Lipid peroxidation in the HPB group significantly ( P <0.05) decreased compared with that in the CON group. However, there was no statistical difference in GPX, and GST activities in the intestinal mucosa among treatment groups. In the liver, the activities of SOD, GPX, and GST, and the level of MDA were unaffected by probiotic supplement. In conclusion, 0.5% of probiotics significantly increased SOD activity and decreased lipid peroxidation in the intestinal mucosa, suggesting that probiotic complex could be potential to improve the small intestinal antioxidant capacity of bird under high ambient temperature conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高温条件下益生菌对肉仔鸡血液、肠黏膜组织和肝脏抗氧化生化参数及抗氧化酶的影响
选用高温环境下4日龄肉仔鸡,随机分为3组,每组9个重复(8只/笼);饲喂基础饲粮(CON)和在基础饲粮中添加0.25%益生菌复合物(LPB、1 × 10 6植物乳杆菌、1 × 10 6枯草芽孢杆菌和1 × 10 6酿酒酵母)和0.5%益生菌复合物(HPB)的试验饲粮。试验28 d后,每组平均体重6只,立即处死,评估益生菌对禽类血清、肠道和肝脏抗氧化参数的影响。结果表明,饲粮中添加益生菌对血清总蛋白、白蛋白、尿素氮和谷胱甘肽等氮组分生化指标无显著影响。此外,饲粮中添加益生菌对禽类血清超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GPX)、谷胱甘肽s -转移酶(GST)活性和脂质过氧化(MDA)无显著影响。在肠黏膜中,与CON和LPB组相比,HPB组SOD活性显著(P <0.05)升高。与CON组相比,HPB组脂质过氧化水平显著降低(P <0.05)。但各治疗组间肠黏膜GPX、GST活性差异无统计学意义。在肝脏中,添加益生菌对SOD、GPX、GST活性及MDA水平均无影响。综上所述,添加0.5%益生菌可显著提高肠道黏膜SOD活性,降低脂质过氧化,提示益生菌复合物可能具有提高高温条件下禽类小肠抗氧化能力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Production Performance of Korean Native Chickens for amgye Chicken Production Effects of Crude Protein and Phytase in the Diet on Growth Performance and Excretion Contents of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Broiler Chicks Farm Survey on Eggshell Quality and Egg Vitamin D3 Contents in Laying Hens Fed Vitamin D3-enriched Diets Overcoming Ethical Conflicts and Dilemmas in Farm Animal Welfare: Investigation of Correlation between Ethical Awareness Level and Compliance with Animal Welfare-Related Regulations in Korean Layer Farms Effects of Probiotics on Antioxidant Biochemical Parameters and Antioxidant Enzymes in the Blood, Intestinal Mucosal Tissues and Liver of Broiler Chicks under High Ambient Temperature Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1