Cambios y permanencias en el discurso político argentino: el caso de la campaña electoral 2019

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Logos-Revista de Linguistica Filosofia y Literatura Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.15443/rl3213
Rocío Flax, Julia Zullo
{"title":"Cambios y permanencias en el discurso político argentino: el caso de la campaña electoral 2019","authors":"Rocío Flax, Julia Zullo","doi":"10.15443/rl3213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is part of a large research on the changes presented in Argentina’s political communication since 2001 to date. Our aim is, in the first place, to investigate these transformations and determine in which realm they belong: within discourse (use of language) or, in a more general way, within political practices. Secondly, we evaluate the importance of such transformations and the eventual need for adjustments in conceptualizations that, in Argentina, discourse analysts have been using for many years. Our working hypothesis dictates that, beyond certain apocalyptic readings regarding a supposed lost of specificity in political discourse, it keeps its distinctive features and, therefore, we can argue that classical definitions have not become obsolete, but they need to be explained in detail for a better understanding of the new modalities in political practices (as in Fairclough, 2003). To verify our hypothesis, we analyse a corpus conformed by Facebook posts taken from the accounts of the two main candidates in 2019 Argentine presidential election. We contrast our results with the classical definitions of political discourse and some new explanations that propose an un-politicization of political discourse in XXI. We adopt Social Semiotics as main theoretical framework with a multimodal perspective.","PeriodicalId":40963,"journal":{"name":"Logos-Revista de Linguistica Filosofia y Literatura","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos-Revista de Linguistica Filosofia y Literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15443/rl3213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is part of a large research on the changes presented in Argentina’s political communication since 2001 to date. Our aim is, in the first place, to investigate these transformations and determine in which realm they belong: within discourse (use of language) or, in a more general way, within political practices. Secondly, we evaluate the importance of such transformations and the eventual need for adjustments in conceptualizations that, in Argentina, discourse analysts have been using for many years. Our working hypothesis dictates that, beyond certain apocalyptic readings regarding a supposed lost of specificity in political discourse, it keeps its distinctive features and, therefore, we can argue that classical definitions have not become obsolete, but they need to be explained in detail for a better understanding of the new modalities in political practices (as in Fairclough, 2003). To verify our hypothesis, we analyse a corpus conformed by Facebook posts taken from the accounts of the two main candidates in 2019 Argentine presidential election. We contrast our results with the classical definitions of political discourse and some new explanations that propose an un-politicization of political discourse in XXI. We adopt Social Semiotics as main theoretical framework with a multimodal perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷政治话语的变化和连续性:以2019年竞选活动为例
本文是自2001年以来阿根廷政治传播变化的大型研究的一部分。首先,我们的目的是研究这些转变,并确定它们属于哪个领域:在话语(语言的使用)中,或者更一般地说,在政治实践中。其次,我们评估这种转变的重要性,以及最终需要调整在阿根廷,话语分析家多年来一直使用的概念。我们的工作假设表明,除了某些关于政治话语中所谓失去特殊性的启示录解读之外,它保持了其独特的特征,因此,我们可以认为经典定义并没有过时,但它们需要详细解释,以便更好地理解政治实践中的新模式(如费尔克劳,2003年)。为了验证我们的假设,我们分析了2019年阿根廷总统大选中两位主要候选人的Facebook帖子所符合的语料库。我们将我们的结果与政治话语的经典定义和一些提出政治话语非政治化的新解释进行了对比。我们以社会符号学为主要理论框架,从多模态的角度进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
La Educación Sexual Integral como movimiento pedagógico: tensiones entre el saber validado y las experiencias directas Poética emergente: la enunciación lírica en la poesía de Américo Reyes Vera El l perimundo de Eliacer Cansino y la percepción de la realidad en el lector Descripción de la retroalimentación de docentes de ciencias en la redacción de un Informe de resolución de problemas por ABP Estrategias multimedia de adquisición léxica de L2 en libro de inglés para kínder a la luz de la propuesta de Paul Nation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1